Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: January 2009

I would like to personally address these sisters and tell them how awesome that I think they are.  They grew up and aged out of the Missouri, Foster Care System, both had been in completely different placements. 

One sister was placed into a foster home where she was loved and accepted and the other was not.  They grew up and while  Lacy Kendrick  did well, April Kendrick fell into the cycle of so many other foster children who the system has failed.  April has managed to turn her life around and now both of these former foster children are adovacating and making changes to the Missouri Foster Care System.

I say bravo to both of you for overcoming the obstacles you had to grow up with and using those experiences to change the lives of other foster children in Missouri.  You are making a difference and you are proving, especially you April,  that how you grew up does not necessarily define the person you become. 

Many people believe that all foster children are predestined for failure, but with the changes you are making as well as the example you are setting I believe that assumption will be proven wrong.  The best changes come from those who have lived it because they are the only ones who really know what is going wrong and what needs to change.  Keep up the good work and know that what you are doing is appreciated.

 

Sisters Making Changes to Foster System

 

Reported by: Angie Weidinger
Friday, Jan 30, 2009 @09:00pm CST

http://ozarksfirst.com/content/fulltext/?cid=114001

Some of Missouri’s foster care policies recently changed, and it’s thanks in part to some former foster children we introduced you to in October, 2007.

You may remember Lacy and April Kendrick, sisters placed in separate foster homes ten years ago. The difference in their care had a direct impact on where they ended up when they aged out of the system.

In this follow-up to an Eye on the Ozarks investigation, we show you how they’re helping to rewrite the rules to make lives better for all future foster kids.

If you take a look at the book sin April Kendrick’s home, you’ll find everything from baby board books to college textbooks.

Not only is the 23-year-old mom taking a full course load at OTC “I’m a manager of Dominoes in Republic,” said April Kendrick.

She’s very busy, but also very happy.

“It makes me feel good,” explained Kendrick.

A few years ago, all that she has now was a fantasy.

“I was mixed up with meth and other drugs,” said April during our interview in 2007.

At that time she was battling alcohol and drug additions, trying to pull her life b ack together after she says the foster system failed her.

“I was so confused,” remembered April “I didn’t understand any of it.”

April felt like all decisions affecting her life were being made by other people, so she rebelled.

“I started acting out,” she explained.

That behavior landed her in six different placements with foster families or group homes.

“I couldn’t ever fit into a place and keep my grades up,” she recalled.

While April was struggling, her sister Lacy was succeeding.

“I’m planning on graduating with a Masters in Psychology and minors in Business and Latin,” Lacy told us in 2007.

Lacy also went through the foster system, but she with one nurturing foster family who involved her in life’s decisions.

“I was the exception,” she told us recently. “I did by chance end up in a great family.”

Since then she’s been working to better the odds for foster kids so they can exit the system like her, not her sister.

“I got to testify for a briefing in Washington D.C.,” she said of her advocacy work.
And people are listening.

“You really can see the difference you’re making,” Lacy explained. “You really can make it better.”

One of the new laws she lobbied for requires all states develop transition plans for each foster kid preparing to age out of the system.

“To work closely with the youth and individualize their plans so services they’re receiving are appropriate for their needs and goals for the future,” said Vonda Wallace, Greene County Circuit Children’s Division Manager.

Independent living classes are also now based on what the foster care youth chooses to learn.

“This is their life, it’s not mine,” said Williams, the manager of Springfield’s older youth transitional program. “Being able to make decisions and voice input I do think they appreciate it.”

“That’s the main thing that the kids have a say in it because I never had a say in it,” said April.
Instead of feeling frustrated, April says she would’ve felt empowered had that program been in place when she was in foster care.

“That would’ve been a lot of help,” said April.

And maybe she could’ve skipped a few painful chapters to get tot his page in her life.

“Yeah, I think I would’ve taken a different turn for sure,” she said.

Lacy is also working on a pilot program that allows older youth to select from a pool of candidates to be their adopted parents. Again, the idea is to empower the youth.

There are currently more than 3500 kids between the ages of 14 and 21 in Missouri’s foster care system. But, the state says there aren’t many families interested in taking in these older youth, and good families willing to help these kids through difficult transitions are very important.

www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-infant-death-30-jan30,0,589914.storychicagotribune.com

DCFS had visited squalid apartment where baby died

 
By Ofelia Casillas

Tribune reporter

January 30, 2009

Four months before the death of an infant this week in a squalid Northwest Side home, state child welfare workers found the same apartment untidy and in disarray but offered no services to the family, records reviewed Thursday by the Tribune show.

The Cook County public guardian said the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services “dropped the ball” and should have opened a case to support the family.

The infant died Tuesday in an Albany Park apartment described by Chicago police as a “health hazard”-roach-infested and ankle-deep in garbage. Ten other children who lived there were taken into state custody and placed in foster homes. Five adults were charged with misdemeanor child endangerment.

The state records reviewed by the Tribune showed that DCFS found the home in similar condition last September. A state worker said the apartment was filthy and unsanitary.

“The door could not fully open to one of the bedrooms there was so much clutter,” the worker noted in a report on Sept. 18. “There were clothes everywhere because so many people are staying in the home. There were roaches crawling in the kitchen and on the floor.”

A month later, a DCFS worker said the family still hadn’t shown “sufficient effort to clean the home,” according to the records. A supervisor agreed there was credible evidence to prove the children had been neglected because of the conditions in the home. Yet DCFS, the workers added, would not be offering services to the family.

Robert Harris, the county’s public guardian, said the DCFS records suggest “they definitely had concerns here.”

“It sounds like there were still hazards and they didn’t do anything after that, and they absolutely should have,” Harris said.

Contacted Thursday evening, DCFS officials said they had no immediate comment on the case.

State records from last fall also show that a child welfare investigator interviewed a 16-year-old girl who was pregnant at the home. Her 2 1/2 -month-old son was the baby who died Tuesday.

Records show DCFS investigated the mother in December for medically neglecting her infant.

The infant, Iven Carlos, was found not breathing in the home in the 3100 block of West Ainslie Street. His cause of death was not determined pending further police investigation, but police don’t believe the death involved foul play.

The child’s mother told authorities that the infant was healthy before she fell asleep and awoke to find the child unresponsive. She fell asleep with the infant on her chest and may have accidentally rolled over onto him, according to a state report.

ocasillas@tribune.com

Copyright © 2009, Chicago Tribune

If you are from Washington state and have a valid complaint against the child protective services department in that state, here is your chance for your voice to be heard. Washington Senator Pam Roach is calling on you to submit to her your complaints for distribution to the press. Now is the time to step forward with these complaints, because Senator Roach is listening!!!! The criteria for the complaints is as follows in her blog post:

Pam Roach Report http://pamroachreport.com

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Please Submit Your Story…Help Document The Abuses

Today a lobbyist came into my office and as sometimes happens I retold some of the absolutely unbelievable stories of CPS family abuse. (Yes, CPS spies…I am still thinking about the deaths and the wrongdoings…I would rather not…but you create some truly disturbing vignettes.)

(Let me first thank the many GOOD CPS workers who are doing their jobs well despite working in an undisciplined agency that frequently makes big mistakes. It is your management and a few unprincipled people who create the press….whose names are never associated with the story.)

Turns out my lobbyist friend and her husband are foster parents. And, they are among the very good ones.

A little toddler boy was brought to them who had been burned in a meth lab. They had him for several years. Thankfully, his face healed. He could smile now in this good home.

Then the state stepped in to reunite the drug abusing, felon mother with the boy. My friends kept the boy over the weekends… the story goes on, the foster parents spending $10,000 to try to protect this little one from his drug addict mother who didn’t want the boy! Turns out the lobbyist is coming to the rally. The word is getting out.

I am assembling a packet for distribution to the press. If you have a “good” or “bad” story that can be condensed to one 8 1/2 by 11 piece of paper (you have to narrow the issue) and you are willing to put down your name and contact information, I would like you to email it to my office. Roach.Pam@aol.com . Remember one page only.

To protect yourself from CPS retaliation you may use the name of a friend or relative as the contact person. The idea is to give the press a place to go for stories. Without some verification of the story it will not be regarded as truth. That is any one’s standard.

Please submit as soon as you can. Sounds like a mini book in the making.

Posted by Pam Roach at 11:47 PM

momlogic.com

For the following story….

 

Social Services Allow Octuplets in Home?

 

http://www.momlogic.com/2009/01/social_services_and_octuplets.php

 

Friday, January 30, 2009
filed under: california octuplets

It’s hard to even visualize 17 people living a two bedroom house, so we called Dr. Charles Sophy, Medical Director for the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS), to find out if this is even legal!

Dr. Sophy tells us “The Department of Children and Family Services has to look at every family situation keeping a safety and risk perspective — as long as the kids are safe then it is OK, unless there is a risk for abuse or neglect including physical, emotional, medical and or educational.”

Dr. Sophy shared with us “We keep a close eye on multiple births that are in the news, because there is a chance we will be called to go in and assess the situation. Anyone can call the hotline and that’s when we go in as a team with standardized tools to assess the safety and risk of the children. We don’t go in there to dismantle the family, but we go in there to support the family. We use a strength-based model and set them up to succeed so we aren’t back out there in two months.”

After talking to Dr. Sophy, we learned there’s no set of rules in California regarding the number of children who can sleep in one bed or number of people in a house, BUT they all must be physically and medically safe.

How do you feel about 17 people living in one house?

 

WHAT I KNOW ABOUT THIS CASE:

Well its not much, just what we have heard on the news, but I form my opinion based on the following:

Apparently, the babies were not born drug addicted or with drugs in their system.  Therefore, the hospital could not call CPS for that.

This mother is trying to make the right choice and breast feed all 8 children.  Something that a person would not decide to do unless they absolutely wanted the best for their children, considering breast feeding 8 babies would be a full time job in and of itself. 

So she lives with her parents, that just means that she has a strong support system to help her with these babies.  Many multiple birth grandparents move in with the parents, or spend the majority of their time at the parents home to help with the new babies.  This just makes it easier for them to offer assistance.

She has 6 other children…and the point is?  My grandparents on my fathers side,  had 13 children, all single births and on my mothers side there were 10 children all single birth.  The number of children does not effect your ability to love and take care of your children.

The foster home I was in had 13 children in it and all they had was a 3 bedroom home.  I know of many foster homes that have more children then bedrooms, so basically in the posters eyes it is okay for CPS to do it…just not the bio-parents.

The mother is a single parent:  A lot of women are single parents, that does not mean that they are bad parents, just single.  Would it make any difference if she was married?  Then you would just say that there was 18 people in the house.  What if she was married and they had all of these children and then her husband died, would that mean the state should remove her children.  God forbid the state get the idea to remove children from single parent homes, just because you disagree.  Single parents are now allowed to adopt children who have been foster children, so apparently even the state does not have a problem with single parents. 

Unless a parent has in someway violated their constitutionally protected rights to the care, control and custody of their children, they are to be free of unnecessary government interference in their relationship with their children.

It does not matter what your opinion is, parents have the right to raise their children in the manner that they see fit, unless they are abusing the children in some manner.  They also have the right to have as many children as they want.

Under the constitution of this nation, you have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  What makes one person happy isn’t necessarily what makes another happy.  Just because someone else doesn’t like your idea of happiness, does not mean that it is wrong or against the law.  

It is people like the poster of this story, that call CPS, for nonabusive, unfounded reasons that makes life hell for some of these parents.  If you do not see actual abuse or neglect…unexplained bruises, rotting teeth, failure of the parent to provide needed medical care, clothing, food, etc.  then mind your own damn business and leave them alone. 

I posted a comment on this page, but apparently she did not want to post it.  In it I recommended that the author of the story do some research on CPS.  I also recommend that she visit Senator Roach’s blog and read what Senator Schaefer has written about GA CPS.  I guess the poster did not want that information passed on.  Here are some of the other comments that have been made about this story on momlogic.com.

ACTUAL COMMENTS FROM THE PAGE:


If you think that 17 people living in a house could be illegal you must be really out of touch with how poor people in America live.- Anonymous
Posted 01/29/09 03:07 PM

Whoever called social services should be ashamed!! Just because a family has many children living in one home does not make them unfit. How many families in the past have had 13-15 children in two bedroom homes and they all thrived and were happy. The mentality of needing lots of room and “private space” for everyone is what has led to the downfall of our economy. Leave this poor mother alone!!!!!! “Is this even legal?!” You have got to be kidding me.- Disgusted
Posted 01/29/09 03:08 PM

It hasn’t been that long since each child having their own room was nowhere near the norm. It hasn’t even been that long since it was common for parents and children to share a single room. Just because they are going to be tight on space doesn’t mean they will be abused or short on love.- birdsfly
Posted 01/29/09 03:12 PM

I don’t feel nearly as pissy about 17 people living in one house, as I do you calling up and trying to start stuff for this family.- What
Posted 01/29/09 03:53 PM

Unless these people are planning to support all 8 children themselves I would consider them highly irresponsible and selfish! Imagine if everyone had that many babies! Don’t expect the “govt” to bail you out. There are more pressing problems in this world.- Belinda
Posted 01/29/09 04:17 PM

Have you ever had the state involved with you or your children? it’s aweful. If they even suspect anything is slightly amiss, they have the right to remove chidren from the home. Have you ever had your children removed from your home while they are crying and screaming for their mommy? How dare you raise questions about a family that you have absolutley no knowledge of? How dare you throw these people into the radar of CPS? What is wrong with you people?- WTF
Posted 01/29/09 04:44 PM

Another example of wealthy Southern CA Women who have all kinds of things to say about how people choose to live while they wallow in their self-absorbed lives. The world would be a better place, quite frankly, if the women at momlogic took care of their own over-indulged, soon to be the next ME-GENERATION children, and left the rest of the population; with their JCPenney jeans and more then 2.5 children and religious and morals choices to themselves. You should go back to the “cocktail choice of the week”, and where to get the “celebrities’ kids’ looks for less” and leave the social commentary and political opinions to actual well read and informed persons.- Anonymous
Posted 01/29/09 05:02 PM

By your question, you seem to think that County Social Services has the right or ability to regulate the number of children a woman can have. Nothing could be further from the truth! Social Services can only step in when there is a reasonable suspicion of neglect or abuse; even then, children who are taken from the home are often put to sleep on the floors of offices and police stations until a place is found for them.- Mr. Ed
Posted 01/29/09 05:23 PM

I must admit that when I heard of such a miracle and that the mother decided not be in the public eye.I was thinking this was a smart idea and that the family was lucky to not need any type of financial help.Specially in this economic time.but how in the hell could you be so irresponsible to live off of your parents with 6 other kids and single.that is as ghetto as it gets.Shame on you mother of 14. living in a 2-3bedroom.I fell that is selfish and she is giving her parents an early funeral!!!!!- amina
Posted 01/29/09 07:23 PM

just another example of people living beyond thier means and expectingthe community to “bail them out” when the gravy train comes to a screeching halt. with 6 kids at home already she’s obviously not working, so her parents are probably already claiming her and her 6 kids as dependents, now they have 8 more. They’re not paying any taxes for sure. Oh well, as long as I have paved roads, free public education for my children, and the gov’t stays out of my business, my tax money is well spent as far as I’m concerned…- not surprised
Posted 01/29/09 08:23 PM

Social services has absolutely no business being involved in these people’s lives unless the doctors at the hospital call. The rest of you need to just mind your own business, the other children appear to have been well taken care of and wanted. More than I can say about a lot of Yuppie’s children I have seen lately. All the yuppie parents seem to want to do is get their “me” time away from their kids and toss money at them as they pass.- Lilathe
Posted 01/29/09 08:37 PM

Whomever decided to find out information as to the legalities of 17 in the same home must be bored out of their wits. Sounds like they need something worthwhile to do in their life if they stoop this low. Get a grip – what about during the depression when it was the norm for grandparents, their children and their childrens children shared the same home. I am in my 60′s and I have a friend at church that is in the same age catagory and grew up in an apartment in Maryland as one of nine children. People need to mind their own homes and own business.- Cathy Alcorn
Posted 01/29/09 08:49 PM

I CANNOT believe you called social services about this family. This is completely and utterly uncalled for. Mom Logic should really be ashamed. This is the worst mom site I’ve ever read. Unbelievable!- Anne
Posted 01/29/09 09:39 PM

Social services SHOULD have been called on this family. Regardless of the mother’s marital and financial status, this is highly questionable behavior.-Just me
Posted 01/29/09 10:04 PM

The dr who instrumented this birth should be taken out of business. This is a disgusting and pitiful thing to happen to a woman and to the kids. Each and every one of them will suffer because of this “miracle” birth.- jdypat
Posted 01/29/09 11:17 PM

It standard practice for most hospitals to send a nurse to the home of a multiple birth after the babies are discharged. Since most multuple birth babies are premature/low birth rate or have complications. Or any baby born “at risk”. Even offered to first time parents.- Chrissy
Posted 01/30/09 01:33 AM

This is just ridiculous! Unless their house is filthy or the kids are in danger why is this even an issue??? I may not agree that they should have had a multiple birth such as this but I am also aware of the fact that we live in America and I cannot tell anyone else what to do with their lives – the really interesting part of that is that I (and no one else either) is in a position to judge anybody else. Was it right? Who can honestly say for sure? Are they good parents is the better question? Will they love all of their children and care for them properly?? That is my only concern and the rest of it is none of my business nor anyone elses.- Kara
Posted 01/30/09 08:29 AM

There are individual children living in 2 parent homes with plenty of bedrooms, getting MURDERED by their own parents, and people are so concerned about issues such as this? This woman was probably so excited to have these babies just to give birth and face criticism from the public who know NOTHING about her personal life. She has a roof over her babies’ heads, and they have family who loves them and will provide for them. Who is anyone to judge?- Jody
Posted 01/30/09 10:06 AM

First of all can we quit treating this woman like a martyr, she still has her kids and no one has taken them away.I agree(especially after watching a family member who was wrongly accused deal with the system) calling CPS might be extreme but people SHOULD be concerned when stories of single moms living with her parents brings another 8 kids into one house.No one should think that 6 or 8 children to one bedroom is normal. That was our parents/grandparents generation, we are in a new millinium and a new green era and need to start thinking as such. We now know that mankind is ruining the earth just by being and she brings 14 more to put a strain on a planet that is already full… that we only have 1 of! Aren’t there droughts going on in California right now as we speak and now 8 more want to drink. And what about the health of those involved? Having 8 kids isn’t just bad for the mothers body, there are huge possibilities for long term negative effects on the babies. Last,for all of you who gush over her and her “miracle” babies need to get a tissue and stop crying. These are not miracle babies they are the result of women monkey-ing around with science.- A
Posted 01/30/09 10:09 AM

Well “A” must have loving well adjusted children… I wonder if they tell them daily what a blight they are on the planet?- birdsfly
Posted 01/30/09 10:29 AM

State to upgrade child welfare

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/38582337.html

(There is a pdf file on this page that shows the changes to be made.)

Deal with advocate group pledges more staff, homes

By Crocker Stephenson of the Journal Sentinel
Posted: Jan. 29, 2009

Wisconsin officials have agreed on a plan intended to fix persistent problems in Milwaukee County’s state-run child welfare program, a national children’s advocacy group announced Wednesday.

The group, Children’s Rights, cited the November death of 13-month-old foster child Christopher Thomas as evidence of continued weaknesses in the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare.

Officials with the bureau and the state Department of Children and Families declined to comment on the agreement Wednesday.

The agreement resulted from months of negotiations between the state and Children’s Rights, which in 1993 filed a class-action lawsuit charging that the Milwaukee County child welfare system failed to protect children in foster care.

In 1998, the state took control of the county’s foster care program, creating the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare. A settlement with Children’s Rights was reached in 2002 mandating a complete overhaul of the child welfare system.

The state is still not in full compliance with several provisions of the 2002 settlement.

“Although the Milwaukee child welfare system has made some important improvements under the court order mandating its reform, the tragic case of Christopher Thomas put a very harsh spotlight on some critical areas in which it is still failing to adequately protect abused and neglected kids,” said Marcia Robinson Lowry, executive director of Children’s Rights, which is based in New York.

For example, the settlement requires that at least 90% of the children in the bureau’s custody have no more than three out-of-home placements, to keep children from the dispiriting experience of being bounced from foster home to foster home.

But according to bureau statistics, only 76% of the children in out-of-home care were in three or fewer placements during the first six months of 2008. During 2007, the rate was 75%. During 2006, the rate was 73%.

The plan announced Wednesday will implement programs to improve placement stability.

The 2002 agreement requires that no more than 0.60% of the children in the bureau’s custody be the victims of substantiated abuse or neglect by a foster parent or by the staff of a licensed facility.

Children in kinship care, such as Christopher Thomas and his 2-year-old sister, are not counted in this measurement.

Without counting children in kinship care, 0.93% of the more than 2,600 Milwaukee County children in the bureau’s custody suffered abuse or neglect during 2007. The rate for 2008 is not yet available.

The agreement seeks to reduce maltreatment and neglect of children in group homes, residential facilities and foster homes. It would also shorten the time children spend in the system, and increase staff support.

Among the plan’s key provisions, the bureau must:

• Increase the number of foster homes from fewer than 700 to 875 by the end of 2009.

• Assess placements and services needed by children in state custody and develop a foster home recruitment and retention plan.

This plan, according to Children’s Rights, must include specific strategies to increase support for foster parents at all stages of recruitment, licensing and placement of children in their homes.

• Add staff to help quicken placement of children in permanent families.

The bureau must create new “relative coordinator” positions to support unlicensed providers of kinship care and create new “permanency consultant” positions to expedite the placement of children with families. A total of 11 new positions would be created.

• Improve mental health assessment and crisis services for children.

The bureau must make sure that all children entering foster care receive initial health screenings, including mental health assessments and follow-up services.

• Improve training for caseworkers and judges who preside over child welfare hearings.

“With this agreement,” Robinson Lowry said, “the state has made a commitment to take every reasonable step to ensure that the children in its custody remain safe, and that every child child’s stay in foster care is as short as possible.”

 

Sadly, it appears to me that this state has been aware of the problems with CPS for a long time.  I wonder how many lives could have been saved it they had reacted earlier.  It is a damn shame, that complaints against CPS and these departments are ignored until it is to late to save the child.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28890451/ 

 

State Senator Admits Foster System Failed in Christopher Thomas Case

WTMJ-TV and JSOnline.com

updated 11:54 a.m. ET, Wed., Jan. 28, 2009

After the discovery of more details in the death of 13-month-old Christopher Thomas, State Sen. Alberta Darling (R-River Hills) says the system has to change.

MILWAUKEE – A state senator admits the state failed an infant who died while in foster care.

After the discovery of more details in the death of 13-month-old Christopher Thomas, State Sen. Alberta Darling (R-River Hills) says the system has to change.

“It totally breaks my heart,” said Darling.

“It rips me apart that these poor little children were tortured. Our state was responsible for taking care of them, and we failed.”

The psychologist reports on Crystal Keith is disturbing.
Keith was serving as a foster parent for her nephew, 13 month old Christopher Thomas and his two year old sister.

Keith said she began abusing Christopher because she thought he was looking at her in a “sexual way” as she changed his diapers.

She said she began beating him and stuck a hairbrush down his throat to get him to stop crying.

Christopher’s sister was also beaten, and was found with burn marks from head to toe from keith allegedly running hot water over her.

She survived the abuse, but Christopher died.
The child welfare bureau made changes after Christopher’s death.

Now nurses will help evaluate child case workers.

But Senator Darling says more needs to be done.

“This woman was not in any way in a condition to have this child,” said Darling.

“We assess foster parents to their fitness and their willingness to care for the child, but we don’t do the same for kinship care.

“Just because someone’s a relative doesn’t mean they’re capable of caring for that child.”

Seth Ireland’s Dad Calls for Changes to CPS

http://www.kmph.com/Global/story.asp?S=9744690&nav=menu612_2_1

 

 

some sites include video footage

Posted: Jan 28, 2009 02:30 AM EST

By Norma Yuriar and Winston Whitehurst

Fresno, CA (KMPH) – The father of a murdered Fresno boy lashed out against the head of Fresno County Child Protective Services for how CPS is handling the investigation of 10-year-old Seth Ireland.

According to a report released by CPS last week, within the five months leading up to Seth’s killing, CPS received a half a dozen phone calls from different people claiming child abuse.

Catherine Huerta with the Department of Children and Family Services, which oversees CPS, says Seth was not removed from his mother’s case because the social worker handling Seth’s case at the time did not believe Seth was in imminent danger.

On December 29th, investigators say Seth was punched, stomped and kicked by his mother’s boyfriend. LeBaron Vaughn has been charged with murder and Seth’s mother Rena Ireland is facing charges of felony child abuse.

CPS records show a case worker stopped by Seth’s Fresno home on December 29th, the same day investigators say the little boy fell victim to deadly child abuse. But the case worker left the home after no one answered the door.

Seth died of blunt force trauma on January 6th. On Tuesday, Seth’s father Joe Hudson spoke before the Fresno County Board of Supervisors during a meeting in downtown Fresno. Hudson publicly criticized Huerta. It’s been disheartening to hear your Director of CPS speaking defensively in public when there has not been a complete and final investigation and never offering her condolences </em>to myself or my son or my family.” Hudson called for Huerta’s resignation during the meeting.

Hudson’s demand comes as the Fresno County Board of Supervisors reviews confidential records into the 10-year-old’s death. A new law allows Board members to review private records when child dies during an active CPS investigation.

Hudson asked the Board of Supervisors to use the information from CPS records to make changes to child protective services. Hudson said “I hope you take my plea to heart, you can no longer protect Seth, it’s too late for him, but I pray to God, that you find ways to protect the potential Seth’s and other children of his county.”

Members of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors spent Tuesday evening reviewing Seth’s file. They did not comment on their finding because of a pending lawsuit against Fresno County Child Protective Services by Mr. Hudson.

 
Seth Ireland’s Father Demands Answers

http://abclocal.go.com/kfsn/story?section=news/local&id=6627818

 

 

By DeShaunta Bullock

Fresno, CA, USA (KFSN) — The father of Seth Ireland spoke out in public with a list of complaints. He says Fresno County Child Protective Services didn’t do enough to save his son’s life.

The ten -year old boy was beaten to death earlier this month. His mother’s boyfriend is accused of the crime.

On Tuesday, Joseph Hudson, the father of 10-year old Seth Ireland, stood before the Fresno County Board of Supervisors saying his son died partly because of a broken child protective services system.

“It’s unconscionable that Seth continued to suffer after this was reported at CPS even more deplorable that he lost his precious life. It could have been prevented.”

Hudson said his son’s case is flawed, and he called for an independent party to investigate the actions of CPS. He also said director Katherine Huerta should resign.

“Seth is not the only child to have died under her watch. Actually if she had any type of human instincts she would have already resigned from her position.”

CPS director Katherine Huerta told Action News she’s had no discussions with Hudson and is <strong>giving him space to grieve.  She said she is open to suggestions and reviews of policies.

In light of the young boy’s death, Judy Case and other members of the Board of Supervisors is now considering a new law that would allow the board to see files and cases when there is a death a CPS.

“When we’re faced with a tragedy and we’ve been faced with a tragedy in the past we have not been able to get information on it. So this is a good step.

Hudson said changes like these should continue for the sake of his child and others.
“Do not allow his life to be in vain. I ask you to please look into this tragedy and make the necessary changes no matter how challenging.”

In another effort to improve services for children, the City Council passed a resolution from Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer. It will provide services from the Marjoree Mason center and the police department whenever a child is involved in a domestic violence. Chief Jerry Dyer says that may have helped in this case.

Fresno Co. board to look at details of Seth Ireland case

http://www.fresnobee.com/updates/story/1158015.html

 

Tuesday, Jan. 27, 2009

By Brad Branan / The Fresno Bee

The Fresno County Board of Supervisors made plans today to review confidential case records about a 10-year-old boy who died after being brutally beaten, allegedly by his mother’s boyfriend.

Supervisors invoked a new state law in its move to review child-welfare services records they previously would not have been able to see. Supervisors said they want a better understanding of why the death of Seth Ireland wasn’t prevented.

Seth was punched, stomped and kicked by his mother’s boyfriend in their west Fresno apartment last month. He died days later. The county’s Child Protective Services received five complaints of alleged abuse or neglect of Seth in the four months leading up to his death.   A sixth report was made as a result of the fatal beating.

The boyfriend, LeBaron Vaughn, 32, has been charged with murder. Seth’s mother, Rena Ireland, 40, faces two counts of felony child abuse. Supervisors had planned to review the records in a closed session today. They were cautioned not to discuss specifics of the case because of an expected lawsuit by the boy’s father.   The father, Joe Hudson, asked the board to make improvements to the child welfare system to prevent other children from dying.

 

KFSN-TV Fresno, CA

Seth Ireland’s Father Confronts C.P.S.

http://abclocal.go.com/kfsn/story?section=news/local&id=6625893

 

 

Fresno, CA, USA (KFSN) — The father of a Fresno boy beaten to death confronted the county Tuesday morning. After he said C.P.S. didn’t do its job.

In light of the beating death of 10-year old Seth Ireland, Supervisor Henry Perea wanted to discuss how a new law could help the board improve child protective services. But at the meeting, Seth Ireland’s father publicly criticized the handling of Seth’s case and said the head of Child Protective Services should have resigned.
Joe Hudson read from a prepared statement with his mother standing by his side. The Board of Supervisors was advised to not speak about any specific case because Hudson has hired a lawyer and is planning to file a lawsuit against C.P.S.

Hudson said he was forbidden from being at the side of Seth’s hospital bed before he died and criticized the handling of the case. “In some instances facts were incorrectly stated and names were obviously switched in error by the 25-year old social worker working this case. This is very alarming and sends clear flags of negligence,” said Hudson.

Hudson criticized the head of C.P.S., Catherine Huerta, for not expressing her condolences to him and is family over Seth’s death.

Huerta said she’s had no discussions with Hudson and was giving him space to grieve.   She said she’s open to suggestions and reviews of policies.

A new law allows the Board of Supervisors to look over private C.P.S. files during closed sessions. They plan on doing that today with Seth’s case and hope it will lead to better policies for the county.

Amazingly CPS can publically state that they are not to talk about the case for fear of lawsuit, but they have not offered this father and his family condolences. They are probably worried that it would be view as an admission of guilt.

It is all about the money for them, it has nothing to do with the fact that this child is dead on their watch. They are more worried about a lawsuit then fixing the system. If they would place half as much energy into fixing the broken CPS system, as they do of trying to avoid lawsuits when the fail to do their jobs…the world would truly be a safer place for children.

This is  the statement released by Wake County Department of Social Services detailing their involvement with (or lack there of) Devarion Gross.

Report Released By Wake County CPS

Report Released By Wake County CPS

WAKE COUNTY CHILD ABUSE DEATH

On Novemeber 3, 2008 Wake County Department of Social Services received two reports on this child, DeVarion Gross, the reports stated that the child was missing and the reporter was asking CPS to check on the child.  Wake County Department of Social Services declined, stating that the report did not meet statutory guidelines of abuse, neglect or dependency.

How can a report of a child missing not fit the guidelines, especially considering this childs age and the previous history of the mother abandoning the child that the reporter gave to CPS? 

Furthermore, when the police were called regarding this matter, they tried to “set up an appointment with the mother.”  Why did they not go to the home and demand to see the child?  So much more could have been done in this case.

What disturbs me most is I almost feel they are minimizing their failure by pointing out the child was already dead on the date of the reports, maybe, but his sister wasn’t.  CPS owed a duty in this case to investigate.

Here are a couple of their policies that I feel gave them jurisdiction just on the little information that is reveled in the news.

J. Abandonment Screening Tool Directions

http://info.dhhs.state.nc.us/olm/manuals/dss/csm-60/man/CS1407-05.htm#P946_105417

Is the parent/caretaker gone for an extended time period without indicating when they will return?

Abandonment is a willful act; a conscious decision is made by the parent/caretaker to abandon the child; there is a clear demonstration that the parent/caretaker does not intend to resume parental responsibilities for the child. The legal definition of abandonment is “any willful or intentional conduct on the part of the parent which evidences a settled purpose to forego all parental duties and relinquish all parental claims to the child.” It is important to determine if the parent/caretaker made arrangements with an alternate caregiver.

A situation where a parent/caretaker left a child with a grandparent and the grandparent is willing to continue to provide care for the child should not be accepted for CPS assessment. The grandparent should be referred to community resources to assist with obtaining legal custody. If the only issue is that the grandparents are having difficulties enrolling the child in school, refer to N.C.G.S §115C-366, Assignment of student to a particular school. A situation where a parent/caretaker left a child with a grandparent who agreed to provide care; the parent did not return to assume caretaking responsibilities, and the grandparent is now saying they are no longer willing to provide care meets the criteria for a CPS assessment.

Another consideration is the appropriateness of the alternate caregiver and their desire to continue to provide care for the child as well as determining the last time the parent/caregiver has been in contact with the child and alternate caregiver. The Infant Homicide Prevention Act requires CPS reports of abandonment to be initiated immediately. This Act requires that DSS contact law enforcement to request their assistance to inquire through the NC Center for Missing Persons and other resources to determine if the child has been reported as a missing child.

M. Illegal Placement/Adoption Screening Tool Directions

http://info.dhhs.state.nc.us/olm/manuals/dss/csm-60/man/CS1407-05.htm#P960_108789

Is the parent/caretaker placing the child for adoption in exchange for money or other compensation?

A parent/caretaker may not pay or give, offer to pay or give, or request, receive or accept any money or anything of value, directly or indirectly for the placement or adoption of a child. An adoptive parent, or another person acting on behalf of an adoptive parent, may pay the reasonable and actual expenses for ordinary living expenses for the mother, medical expenses, counseling services. It is neglectful to accept payment in kind for a child, such as trading a child for a car.

Is the parent/caretaker placing the child for adoption without executing a Consent for Adoption?

A parent/caretaker can not place a child with an alternate caregiver without executing their consent for adoption. The parent/caretaker must have the authority to place the child and consent to the child’s adoption.

Is the parent/caretaker placing the child in violation of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children?

The Compact is a legally and administratively sound means of placing children across state lines with the same safeguards and services as are available when they are placed within their own state. The Compact provides the means for securing an evaluation of a prospective placement before the child is sent outside the state and provides assurance that the sending state retains jurisdiction over the child sufficient to ensure that the child receives adequate care and protection. Placements across state lines require the cooperation of agencies in ensuring that potential placements are evaluated for suitability and that supervision will be provided for the time necessary to determine that the placement is in the child’s best interest.

This was a report of a missing child.  The reporter stated that they had not seen the child for a while and they were concerned, that the mother had in the past, given the child to other people.  It fits with the screening tool above and it should have been investigated.  Especially with cases like Caylee Anthony fresh in our minds.

§ 7B‑302.  Assessment by director; access to confidential information; notification of person making the report.

http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_7B/GS_7B-302.html

(a)      …When the report alleges abandonment, the assessment shall include a request from the director to law enforcement officials to investigate through the North Carolina Center for Missing Persons and other national and State resources whether the juvenile is a missing child…

 

 

 

The very last line on

VI. MALTREATMENT SCREENING TOOL AND PROCEDURES: 

 

If the appropriate response is in doubt, the social worker should respond in the most protective way

 

http://info.dhhs.state.nc.us/olm/manuals/dss/csm-60/man/CS1407-05.htm#TopOfPage

 

 

For more information, or to view the story in it’s entirety visit http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/4402868/.

Report released in Garner toddler’s death

http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/4402868/

Wake County Child Protective Services had heard from two individuals concerned about the welfare of a 19-month-old Garner boy found dead in his home in mid-November.

Social workers concluded, however, that neither report included information about child abuse or neglect that would give them grounds to intervene, according to a statement the agency released Monday.

911 caller: Toddler had been dead for three weeks
A woman calling 911 tells an emergency dispatcher that her grandson has been dead for about three weeks and that her son found the body in the boy’s home, according to a 911 call released Monday.

For more on this story visit:

http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/4101107/

Social services officials were warned about 19-month-oldBy Thomasi McDonald, Staff Writer

Two people contacted county child protective service workers on Nov. 3 to report that 19-month-old DeVarion Gross was missing and could be in harms’ way.

But by then he had already been dead for about a month, Wake County child protective services officials reported today.

 For more on this story, please visit:

http://www.newsobserver.com/100/story/1382672.html

Boy who was abused laid to rest

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/34747279.html

 

 

Grief succumbs to anger as family, friends of boy’s parents clash; father injured

By Crocker Stephenson of the Journal Sentinel
Posted: Nov. 19, 2008
Jack Orton

Family, friends and funeral home officials try to restore order l after a fight broke out during the funeral for a 13-month-old boy whose aunt and foster mother have been charged with beating him to death last week.

Family, friends and funeral home officials try to restore order l after a fight broke out during the funeral for a 13-month-old boy whose aunt and foster mother have been charged with beating him to death last week.

The emotional funeral of Christopher L. Thomas Jr. erupted in violence Wednesday as family and friends of the child’s mother and father clashed with each other in bitter frustration.

Christopher’s foster mother, Crystal P. Keith, was charged last week with beating the 13-month-old boy to death and with torturing his 2-year-old sister, who remains hospitalized. Keith is married to the brother of the child’s father, also named Christopher Thomas.

Thomas, 22, who is serving a work release term on a drug conviction, attended the service with several friends and family. He sat in the first row of the Serenity Funeral Home chapel near the baby’s 23-year-old mother, Candace Glover.

From the start, the funeral stirred deep emotions.


Christopher’s child-sized steel casket was open. Mourners gasped, some wept, as they approached him. He wore white formal clothes, a white shirt and a white bow tie. His tiny body was difficult to square with the violence of his death. He appeared doll-like.

As services began, Glover rose from her chair and stood at the foot of the casket. She refused to let go of the casket or be seated.

She rocked back and forth, sobbing, and appeared as if she would collapse.

As the Rev. Jermaine Reed sang “Jesus Loves Me,” he came forward and stood by Glover’s side. He placed his arms around her and held her up.

Eventually, with loud cries, she fell to the floor.

Glover cried out “Let me go! Let me go!” as people carried her to the side of chapel. There she lay on the floor, sobbing, as other mourners tried to assist her.

The fight erupted near the end of the service, as people lined up to pass the casket in final tribute.

Several people began to taunt Thomas because of his relationship to the foster parents. He clutched the funeral program in his fists, his eyes closed.

Glover was assisted to the casket. Just as she reached it, the brawl began.

Who threw the first blow was unclear. Thomas was punched on the left side of his face. He was removed from the chapel and taken to a couch, the left side of his face severely swollen, a bloody gash beneath his left eye. Family surrounded the couch to protect him.

In the chapel, chairs were thrown aside and flower displays were knocked over. Several people grabbed the boy’s casket to keep it from being flung down. Glover screamed.

As people cried out for calm, the fight spread to the funeral home lobby and into the street. The lectern with the visitor’s book was knocked over. Someone reported seeing a gun, and stunned onlookers fled the building.

An ambulance arrived at the front of funeral home as the casket was carried out the back and loaded into a hearse.


The hearse hurriedly pulled away toward Graceland Cemetery, followed by a small group of cars. In an area of the cemetery designated Baby Land, a quick graveside service was held at a plot donated to the family by the county.

Most of the handful of people at the graveside appeared to be family and friends of Glover, the boy’s mother.

Clutching several stuffed animals to her chest, she appeared too distraught to leave the back seat of her car.

Glover’s family said they did not have enough money to rent a place to gather after the funeral.

It was a cold day. They stood in the cemetery near old cars and grieved.

 

 

Christopher Thomas’ aunt details reasons for abuse

http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/38433079.html

 

 

Psychologist concludes she knew it was wrong

By Crocker Stephenson of the Journal Sentinel
Posted: Jan. 26, 2009

 

For complete archived coverage of the story of the death of 13-month-old Christopher L. Thomas Jr., click here.

Days after state child welfare workers placed the infant Christopher Thomas and his 2-year-old sister in the care of their aunt, the 24-year-old woman miscarried, an event she blamed on the children. Within weeks, she was abusing them, believing Christopher wanted her sexually and that his sister was “sneaky,” according to a court document filed Monday.

Crystal Keith is charged with beating Christopher to death and with torturing his older sister for months. She has pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. A report filed by forensic psychologist Kenneth Smail paints a portrait of a deeply troubled woman, but concludes Keith knew the difference between right and wrong.

“Her conduct occurred as an expression of her depression and stress,” Smail writes. “It was not something that was out of her control.”

According to the report, Keith grew up in large family where, she told Smail, she was sexually abused, depressed and at times suicidal. She moved in with Reginald Keith when she was 16. They had a child, then married four years later.

Christopher and his sister are the children of Reginald Keith’s brother. The Keiths became Christopher and his sister’s kinship foster parents in June.

According to the report, Keith began slapping the sister’s hand. When that seemed to have no effect, she began hitting her hands and feet with the back of hairbrush. She pulled and twisted both children’s extremities.

“She did recall placing (the girl’s) feet under hot water because the (striking) was no longer effective,” the report says.

“She said she did that until the child’s skin began to bubble. She said that she made sure that (the girl) wore socks so that Reginald would not see the injuries.

“She said that in October, (the girl) began to ‘act better’ so she turned attention to Christopher.”
Christopher turned 1 that month.

According to the report, “one of her thought distortions that seemed particular to Christopher was that she perceived him to ‘want me in a sexual way,’” based on how he looked at her when she changed his diaper.

“She said such observations on her part resulted in her hitting him in the leg and in other parts of the body. . She would keep hitting him until he stopped crying.”

The report quotes Keith talking about the beating she gave Christopher on Nov. 10, which resulted in his death the next day.

“I had in my mind that I need to hit him. He was trying to control me, and I punched him in the leg. He was still crying. I hit him some more so I hoped that he would stop crying.”

According to the report, she said she slapped him, choked him and shoved the handle of a hairbrush down his throat.
“All my life I wanted to die, but instead he died,” she is quoted as saying in the report.

“That isn’t fair. There was incest in my family. I was so sad. I’ve always been sad and alone.”

As for Christopher’s sister, the report noted that by the time she was hospitalized, her weight had fallen below the first percentile, she had four fractures, could not use her left arm, and had burns “from head to her foot, some of which were consistent with flowing water burns with blistering and oozing observed on those wounds.”

Keith attempted to hide the children’s injuries from her family, the report says.

“I believe the record is replete with indications that she appreciated that what she was doing was wrongful,” Smail wrote.

A hearing on the report is set for Wednesday before Milwaukee Circuit Judge Patricia McMahon. Keith’s trial is set for May 4.

 
I just want to point out a few things that prove to me that this sick ass woman knew exactly what she was doing…

She hid the bruises and evidence of abuse from family members including her husband.  This to me shows that she knew exactly what she was doing.  Furthermore, she obviously had enough control not to hurt these children in front of her husband, which shows to me that she made the decision to hurt these children..

Where is her and her husbands child and how did she treat her child in comparison to her neice and nephew????

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers