Skip navigation

 100_0252Special note:  There are pictures inserted into this post,  if you click on them you can see some of the documentation of my complaint, including the forged document.  I recommend seeing the picture titled actual Signature and then viewing the forgery, it is the only way you can see the difference between the two.  Also if you wish to view just the juicy parts of Allison Bakers Criminal Background Search see pages 3 and 4, she was charged with 8 counts of forging perscriptions to obtain a controlled substance.  These counts were Knocked down to misdemeanor drug possession, but why was she even working for DSS?

Allow me to apologize for the lengths of my posts in advance,  the only way to get the full stories out is to put all the information on here.  There is never a short version when it comes to CPS involvement.  Also, I am really interested in your comments, or if you have a story to tell, please feel free to leave a comment on this page.  I will read and respond to them all.  If you would like to email me, to share your story, comment on mine, or just to talk…my email address is lawdoll1@gmail.com

 

 

 

 
 
 
 NOTE: Social Worker 1, Allison S. Baker, has been charged with Felony Obstruction of Justice and is awaiting trial for forging my husband’s signature to a Safety Assessment that never occured. I name NCDSS in this complaint, because although I have complained about this repeatedly to them and sent them documented proof of the violations in this case, they have done nothing. NCDSS is directly responsible for the conduct of a county office according to case law that has, found and held, that NCDSS a principle, agent relationship exsist between North Carolina DSS and a county office. By not stepping in and responding to this matter, NCDSS has violated its duties and is therefore also responsible for the illegal activities that have occurred in this case. 

 

This is my story…Of course it isn’t the whole story, but it is without a doubt what I am most pissed off about at the moment.

CPS’s Failure To Protect My Stepdaughter

I am writing because I feel that the Wilkes County Department of Social Services has failed in its duty to protect my step-daughter. I have listed the reasons for this complaint as follows:

  • Forged and Falsified Documents
  • Failed to follow statutory investigation requirements/time limits.
  • Accepted a retaliatory report on us that had been screened out by another county.
  • Failed to disclose vital information during a physiological evaluation.
  • Failed to investigate reports of bruises and neglect.
  • Bias and discriminatory comments directed at me and my husband.
  • Retaliated against us for complaining about their violations.

 

My husband, and I made the initial report to the Wilkes County Department of Social Services on August 15, 2006 and for the first two months they did nothing, even though our report concerned unexplained bruises and dental neglect. The worker assigned to the case,Allison Baker did not go to the residence of my step-daughters mother until the last week of October. Two months after our initial report. I supplied CPS with pictures of my Stepdaughter’s teeth taken by the dentist and a statement written by him, stating that it was neglect.

After our initial report was made I spoke with our social workers supervisor Mary Henderson, who asked why my husband hadn’t taken his daughter to the dentist if we first noticed the cavities on December 17, 2005, I explained to her that my husband has standard visitation, he has his daughter every other weekend, dentist offices are not normally open on weekends and that he had informed her mother several times of the condition of the child’s teeth.

The first time that we had her on a week day we took her to the dentist. (June 27, 2006) I also explained to Mary Henderson that my husband was told that if he tried to take his daughter before then, on a date that was not scheduled for visitation, that he would be arrested. The mother did not take the child to the dentist although we carry dental insurance, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, effective date 7/05, The mother carries dental insurance Delta Dental, effective date 11/05 and the child was on North Carolina Medicaid until July 31, 2006, this to me is willful neglect on the mother’s part.

On August 21, 2006, I called the Allison Baker, and informed her that on my stepdaughter’s weekend visitation with us I had noticed small round bruises on her back in the vicinity of the waist line of her jeans. The social worker told me that the next time the child had bruises to get pictures, yet she still did not go to the residence and conduct an investigation.

On August 27, 2006, I met with the Allison Baker, at the Wilkes County Department of Social Services at 10:00am. I took with me the pictures of my stepdaughter’s teeth and a videotape of her in our care and footage of our home dated August 4, 2006 to present.

On October 14, 2006 I noticed that my stepdaughter had a bruise on her right side, on her stomach, dime sized and turning brown, so I looked her over and discovered more bruises on her. One on the back of her right leg right below her butt, it was dark quarter sized and another on the inside of her left upper thigh, this one looked like fingers, not finger prints, but full finger, three to be exact. These were not welts or red marks but actual bruises. I took pictures, as I had been advised by the Allison Baker to do; I also videotaped the bruises in case the pictures did not come out. Plus, it could not be disputed that it was truly my stepdaughter that way.

While I was videotaping the bruises on the upper part of her body, she leaned over rubbed the front of her shin and said, ‘These are normal bruises.‘ I took that to mean that the ones I was videotaping were not ‘normal’.

I then called the Wilkes County Department of Social Services emergency number, but was greeted by the message, ‘This phone is not answered and these messages are not listened to.’ I was, at this point, at a complete loss of what to do next, so I called the Surry County Sheriff’s Department who informed me that it was not their jurisdiction because the bruises occurred in Wilkes County at the child’s mother’s home.

On Sunday, October 15, 2006 I found the Allison Baker’s home phone number in the phone book and called her at home. I informed her of the bruises, that I had taken pictures and videotaped the bruises and asked her what to do. She advised me to call the Wilkes County Sheriff’s Department and make a report with the worker on call. Allison Baker did not come to our home, even though she was the assigned worker, she did not do anything. This social worker, aware of the bruises, did not go to the child’s school to check on her, until five days after I informed her of these bruises nor would she return my calls on October 16, 2006 when I tried to get the videotape to her.

I called the worker on call at the Wilkes County Sheriff’s Department; I specifically described the appearance and location of the bruises. I explained to the worker on call that we hadn’t noticed the bruises October 13, 2005, because we went to the haunted trail and did not get home until late. The worker on call said that she had to call her supervisor to see if this was urgent enough to send some one out to our house at that time, but called later and said that they declined to investigate it. The call was screened out because of an error that the intake worker made.

On October 23, 2006 I called the main office in Raleigh and complained about the way that Allison Baker and the Wilkes County Department of Social Services were handling this case. I was directed to someone else.

On October 24, 2006, Oscar Howard “Hal” Wilson, III a Social Worker Supervisor at the Wilkes County Department of Social Services called our home, believing that he was calling Phyllis Fulton in Raleigh. During his lengthy message to Ms. Fulton, which he left on our home answering machine, he released my name as the reporter, the child’s name, and basically admitted that it was improbable the child received all of these bruises from a haunted ‘hay ride, but…’ He also said that they were going to advice me to make another report. A report that I was later criticized for making.  

On October 24, 2006 I received a letter from the Wilkes County Department of Social Services dated October 15, 2005, that thanked me for my report of suspected child abuse…’The report was not accepted for investigation because the child is nine years old and is not stating that anything adverse has happened to her.’ This letter is signed by Deborah Koen, SWIII and Oscar Howard “Hal” Wilson, III is listed as Social Worker Supervisor at the bottom. ( He had clearly shown his compentenc level with the phone call above.)Now I fail to see how this report could have been screened out because the child did not state that anything adverse had happened to her and no one even spoke to her on October 15, 2006.

It was also stated during my phone contact with Wilkes County Department of Social Services that the child fell at the haunted trail and that was how she received the bruises. I informed them that her daddy carried her through the whole trail because she was scared, that she never fell and that if she had it still would not explain how she got bruises on such a diverse area of her body. I was treated like a liar.

I called a different supervisor Bill Sebastian on October 24, 2006 and complained about the fact that the report was screened out on October 15, 2006. He suggested that I file a new report with the Wilkes County Department of Social Services that would be assigned to a different team. I did file a new report on this date. I listed specific dates that my stepdaughter had shown up with bruises, the exact placement and size of the bruises. I also stated that her dental care had been neglected to the point that when we took her to the dentist on July 3, 2006 she had to have teeth I and J extracted. The new report was accepted and assigned to a new social worker, Ruth Parker as of this date, March 8, 2007, I still haven’t heard from her.

On October 25, 2006 I talked to the Allison Baker, who asked us to come in to her office on October 27, 2006 because she was now investigating us, although at the time of our phone conversation she did not tell us that there had been a report made against us. Allison Baker, also asked why I hadn’t told her that my husband had only been seeing his daughter regularly for a year, I told her that I did tell her that he hadn’t seen her for four years because her mother wouldn’t let him. I informed her that we had recorded phone calls between ourselves and the mother where my husband beg to see his daughter and told her I would bring her those tapes the 27the because the mother had not been truthful with her about the situation.

My husband and I met with the Allison Baker on October 27, 2006 at 4:00pm; it was at this time that we gave her the videotape from October 14, 2006. She viewed the tape at that time, did not really comment on the bruises and did not state that it was improper or show any concern over my videotaping the bruises on my stepdaughter.

Allison Baker had in her possession a report that had been made against us that contained things like…We had poison Ivy in our yard, trees growing in our gutters, dirty dishes in the sink, that we make the child sleep on the floor, eight children living in our home, the child had woke up with a rat on her chest, my daughter had left a bruise on child’s arm… I asked the her when this report was made and all she would say was that it was old, really old.  Then why didn’t they investigate it when it was made?  Another statutory law violation or an excuse to investigate us because we complained two days earlier?

I didn’t understand why she was even investigating it, the stuff contained in it was stupid and the social worker had already seen videotape of the inside of our home, dated August 4, 2006 and on up. Furthermore, why didn’t she come to our home and investigate it? Isn’t that the statutory requirement?

Allison Baker voiced concern and informed me specifically that no recording devices were allowed in the interview room. She also stated that she was covering her ass in case the District Attorney’s office became involved in our case, when we question why the DA would become involved she never answered the question.

At this meeting Allison Baker also stated that she had finally had a home visit at the mother’s home and the place was immaculate. I stated, ‘Yea but what about the trailer that she was living in two months ago when we made our report.’ The mother had moved by the time a home visit was done. The social worker also did not want to hear the tapes that proved that the mother was lying to her. Allison Baker restated at this meeting for us to get pictures of the bruises and did not say anything negative about the videotape I had made of the bruises.

On October 30, 2006 I spoke with James D. (Donnie) Bumgarner, Director of the Wilkes County Department of Social Services and voiced my concerns about the way this case was being handled. I was scheduled to met with the Mr. Bumgarner, October 31, 2006, but when I arrived I found out that I would be by myself in a room with not just the Mr. Bumgarner, but With supervisors Mary Henderson, Bill Sebastian, and Sonya Freeman. I felt that this was an intimidation tactic on their part, but I am not easily intimidated so I again voiced my concerns about the handling of this case.

I was told that since the child was not disclosing their hands were tied to which I replied, ‘So when shes older and all messed up from being abused are you going to tell her that if she would have disclosed you could have helped her, lay all the responsibility of the abuse on her shoulders, her fault you couldn’t help.’ I also told them that abused children do not always disclose and when they can’t speak for themselves because they’re scared and intimidated by the abuser, someone else needs to step in and be a voice for them. That’s what I am trying to do.

At the meeting on October 31, 2006 one of the supervisors, Sonya Freeman asked if my husband and I would be willing to come in for mediation with the mother. I said that we would, but voiced a concern about mediating abuse. North Carolina court doesn’t even allow mediation where there is suspected domestic or child abuse, so I failed to comprehend how Child Protective Services could.

On November 6, 2006 my husband and I showed up for the scheduled mediation, we were the only ones who showed up. Sonya Freeman was supposed to be there, but had an emergency with her son. The mother had apparently never been contacted about the date and time of the mediation. Allison Baker made excuses about why we were not called and notified that the mediation would not occur. We had to drive for forty five minutes to make this appointment, it was also my son’s fourteenth birthday, but we made it a priority to make this appointment.

According to Sonya Freeman when I spoke with her November 7, 2006 the Allison Baker was supposed to have called us and informed us that the mediation would need to be rescheduled, but she never did. The mediation was rescheduled for November 8, 2006, but my husband had to work that day and we could not attend. Furthermore, by this time we were so frustrated with, what our opinion appeared to be gross incompetence that we had developed a trust issue with the Wilkes County Department of Social Services and their ability to investigate this case.

On November 10, 2006 my stepdaughter came home for weekend visitation with a huge bruise on the inside/front of her right thigh that appeared to be a hand print, I did videotape this bruise. During this video she is making excuses for the bruise, ‘I usually get them from running into windows’, ‘I threw a bouncy ball and it came back and hit me in the leg’, ‘I must have got it from being kicked in Karate’. I again informed Allison Baker of the bruise and that I had videotaped it, although I waited until Monday to do so, because honestly what was the point of calling before then, they wouldn’t have responded anyway.

November 14, 2006 we went to court on our petition for change of custody filed in June 2006. This hearing was postponed until the Wilkes County Department of Social Services finished the investigation that we initiated. The Judge also issued an order that DSS submit their findings to him.

On November 20, 2006 I delivered a copy of the videotape to Sonya Freeman, when I spoke with Ms. Freeman on November 22, 2006 she stated that she could see prints on the child and that she was concerned by what she saw. She did not state any concerns about my videotaping the bruises.

On November 27, 2006 I spoke with Sonya Freeman who was now stating that the video was not very clear and jumped around, speeding up and down. I told her at points in the video I had recorded for her that I paused it and slowed it down so that she could see the bruises. I also believe that it was on this occasion that concern was voiced over my videotaping bruises on my stepdaughter. I made an appointment to meet with Sonya Freeman on December 5, 2006 at 4:30pm. Also somewhere around this date is when Wilkes County Department of Social Services stated that they couldn’t tell who was ‘telling the truth’ and decided to send all parties for a physiological evaluation.

On November 30, 2006 I spoke with Allison Baker, who on this date, for the first time, voiced a concern over the videotaping. I told her that she was the one who told me to get her pictures and proof of the bruises and that was what I had done. She stated get pictures.

On December 1, 2006 I faxed a letter to Allison Baker, I also faxed a written complaint to Donnie Bumgarner asking that the Allison Baker be removed from our case and requesting that our case be moved to a different county. I have never received a response from him regarding this request and complaint. In this complaint I stated my concerns about the handling of this case, that we believed there to be some kind of bias, coercion, or other unethical behavior occurring in this case, because we could not understand how given the demographics and evidence that we had submitted in this case WCDSS couldn’t see what was going on.

I think I need to mention that we are not the only ones who filed a report of abuse and neglect against the mother. The mother’s other daughter’s, dad and step mom filed a report August 10, 2006 alleging, among other things neglect and physical abuse. They have pictures of bruises on his daughter, but Wilkes Department of Social Services has never contacted them about their report, or viewed the pictures. They are participating in the physiological evaluation as is this daughter. They have major complaints against the Wilkes County Department of Social Services too.

I met with Sonya Freeman and Mary Henderson on December 5, 2006; at this time they voiced concern over my videotaping the bruises. They also made what I felt was inappropriate comments, such as saying that the father and mother didn’t even act human during the pick up and drop offs, how close could the child and her little brother be since they never see each other…(we schedule their visits together if we can.) I was even criticized for saying that children need hugs and that normal families hug and show affection.

During my meeting with Sonya Freeman and Mary Henderson they stated that the child was clearly uncomfortable during the videotaping. First if you see the video, she is uncomfortable, as am I. She doesn’t want her underwear to show and she is afraid that someone will come in, but she is also joking around and talking. In the second video she is trying to prevent me from recording the bruises and making excuses but she is joking around and playing as well. Plus she wore the same clothes the rest of the night (T-shirt and panties). I don’t think it is so much the fact that I am recording her, but the fact that I am recording the bruises that makes her uncomfortable.

I asked Mary Henderson and Sonya Freeman at this meeting if they thought the child would have been any more comfortable if someone from Social Services had took pictures of the bruises and they stated that she would not have been. I also tried to explain to them that the mother is so verbally abusive to my husband that he can not communicate with her that is why they don’t talk. If he says the slightest thing to her during the pick up and drop offs she causes a scene in front of their daughter and she does not need to see that. I also tried to explain to them that my stepdaughter will not even acknowledge us when her mother is present because she is so scared of her. Mary Henderson’s reply was, ‘Why should she have to?’ I could not get her to understand that the child is perfectly fine, comfortable, and happy with us when her mother isn’t around, but when her mom is around she becomes wooden.

After my meeting with Mary Henderson and Sonya Freeman on December 5th, I felt completely helpless and defeated. I was also angry because of the bias nature of their comments about my husband. It was at this point that we realized that we were not going to be listened to.

On December 9, 2006 the Allison Baker came to our house as part of her investigation, almost four months after the report was filed. We were found to have a safe home, which means that the report against us should have been found unsubstantiated, but as of this date February 27, 2007 it has not. She wrote a under Section 2 Safety Response, “1 (circled) Stepmom and dad, agree to not physically discipline the child and to use other forms of punishment. Neither on of us had ever used physical discipline on my stepdaughter…ever. According to DSS policy, Allison Baker was not allowed to use allegations on this assessment, but she did.

On December 11, 2006 I spoke with the Allison Baker about the date of the physiological evaluation, it was scheduled to begin January 5, 2007. On December 12, 2006 Allison Baker called and stated that she needed my husband to come in and sign papers giving his permission for his daughter to do the physiological evaluation. The social worker also informed me during this phone call that I should sit on the Child Abuse Prevention Team in Wilkes County.

My husband went and signed a consent/authorization for medical/mental health evaluation child medical evaluation program form on December 18, 2006. This form lists that the referral is made by authority of (check one) Checked is DSS Director—when acting as temporary guardian of child found abandoned or without natural guardian or when having been vested with parental rights by the adoption or termination of parental rights laws (G.S. 35A-1220). The Criteria marked does not fit this case. The parents in this case have joint legal custody of their daughter. The box that was checked was misleading in that it made my husband feel that the evaluation had been ordered and he had no choice but to allow the evaluation. This consent was therefore, illegally obtained.

On January 9, 2007 a new Wilkes County Social Worker,Renae Steele called and spoke with my husband. She informed him that Allison Baker was no longer employed at the Wilkes County Department of Social Services and that she had been assigned the case.

On January 17, 2007 Renae Steele came to our home and verified it as a safe home. I showed her the videotape of the bruises, and she asked at that time that I no longer videotape the bruises , instead we are to call her and she will come right out. I told her I had only videotaped the bruises on two occasions and had only done so because Allison Baker instructed me to get her pictures.

On January 24, 2007 my husband and I met with the Psychologist, Dr. James Powell, who informed him that a report had been filed against him. I called Renae Steele and left several messages; I also called, Keith Elmore, on this date and complained about the way Wilkes County had handled this case, he told me that he would go to WCDSS and look at the file and the pictures of Lydia’s teeth, but when I spoke with him again on January 26, 2007 he informed me that he did not veiw the file or the pictures and assured me that WCDSS would make an unbiased decision. Mr. Elmore advised me to call someone else, who advised me to call someone else in Raleigh, who had someone else call me.

January 30, 2007 I spoke with Renae Steele about the report against us that they had given to the Psychologist; because I do not believe it is a viable report. It does not meet the statutory definition of abuse or neglect. Renae Steele said that the initial report had been made to and screened out by Surry County Department of Social Service on August 16, 2006. (We live in Surry County) She further stated that Wilkes County Department of Social Services received the report on August 17, 2006, she stated that she didn’t understand why it was screened in by Wilkes County, but she would find out and call me back.

Renae Steele called back about an hour later and stated that she had asked Mary Henderson why the report had been screened in and that she told her the only reason it was screen in was because of the rat on the child’s chest statement. Now remember before Allison Baker started investigating the retaliatory report, she had already seen video of our home, Dated August 4, 2006 and on to the present time. She knew this was a false report.

I met with the Psychologist, Dr. Powell, February 6, 2007 who told me one of the things that Wilkes County asked to him to evaluate was whether or not my videotaping the bruises on my stepdaughter had any adverse effect on her. They did not inform him that I had been told by them to get pictures of the bruises.

February 7, 2007 I spoke with Donnie Bumgarner about their failure to disclose to the Psychologist that I had been instructed by them to get pictures of the bruises; he told me that he would have Mary Henderson call me. I called Mary Henderson and asked her why they did not inform the Psychologist that I was told by Allison Baker to get her pictures of the bruises, she admitted that I was told to get pictures, but not videotape. She also stated that she would call Psychologist and inform him, but she never did. I recorded this conversation and gave a copy to the Psychologist.

I called Raleigh and complained about the Wilkes County Department of Social Services, again. It was admitted to me that in the beginning of this case they had failed in their duties, but they did not need to inform the Psychologist that they told me to get pictures and that I should trust them. I can not trust them because they have failed to protect my stepdaughter as they are required to do by law.

February 13, 2007, my husband’s last appointment with The psychologist, Dr. Powell and my MMPI 2 test, which I completed in less than 1 hour.

February 23, 2007, my stepdaughter missed a scheduled appointment with the psychologist.

March 20, 2007 I e-mailed Donnie Bumgarner, in it I asked him the following questions:

What was occurring with our report of abuse against the mother?

When the psychological evaluation would be complete?

Why the report against us was screened in, after being screened out by Surry County?

Why the retaliatory report against us had not been unsubstantiated yet? Especially since two different workers had been to our home and completed a Safety Assessment, and found our home and us to be safe and appropriate, obviously these workers could tell that the report against us was a lie.

Why Renae Steele, had not sent us a copy of the Safety Assessment as she said should would when she did it.

In this e-mail I also point out that per our last conversation he had stated that he would have Renee Steel call me, which she never did, I also pointed out that it had been over 6 month since we made our report and it should not take that long to make a decision, just as it should not have taken Allison Baker over 2 months to go to the mother’s home. I also stated the following:

‘I am still very concerned about the way your office has handled this investigation. The comments that have been made to us by Mary Henderson and Sonya Freeman, have been very bias in nature and should not be ignored or blown off with a comment such as ‘I am sure those comments made this more difficult for you.’

Enough is enough, either substantiate the abuse and neglect against the mother that we have proven to your department or don’t. But make a decision, and allow us to set a court date so that we can at least try to protect these little girls through the legal system. Our court hearing has been postponed until you make your report. It should have been completed months ago. I know for a fact that we have enough evidence of abuse to prove it in court.

We have cooperated with you fully and done everything that you request we do, even though we should never have been investigated by your department at all. We reported abuse as we are required to by law and in turn you have allowed us to persecuted for speaking up. In my opinion your departments handling of this case has enabled the abuse of these little girls to continue and given the mother a heads up on how better to hide the evidence of it.’

March 29, 2007, I spoke with the psychologist’s office, my stepdaugher still has not made an appointment. I called to speak with the Donnie Bumgarner, but was put through to Mary Henderson instead. ( This call is recorded.) I asked her why they had done nothing about the mother not taking my stepdaugher to the psychological evaluation, I also asked if they had considered that she might not be taking the girls on purpose and Mary Henderson stated that they had considered that possiblity. I asked what they were going to do about it. I also told her I felt that the Wilkes County Department of Social Services was guilty of negligence and failure to protect in their handling of this case.

Wilkes County DSS filed a Juvenile summons and notice of hearing (abuse/neglect/dependency) March 29, 2007 at 4:19 pm, directly after I made this phone call.

March 30, 2007, I spoke with the psychologist and he stated that he had reported all missed appointments to DSS, but he can’t make them come. He will give them a month.

April 2, 2007, We went to the Wilkes County Courthouse and picked up the petition filed by DSS on March 29, 2007 in it, it states that they are filing because:

‘The juvenile is a neglected juvenile, in that the juvenile is not provided necessary medical care. Specifically, on or about 8-16-06 to present:

stated facts filled in by DSS state:

In order to complete this investigation, a forensic interview with the families involved was reccomended. (Their spelling error) Parents are not following DSS reccomendations in regards to a mental health assessment for children and adults. Dad and step mom (us) have gone to the psychologist and finished their interviews. The mother and her husband continue to miss their appointments, and also not take the juvenile and her sister to theirs. The psychologist has called SWS supervisor Mary Henderson as well as SW Renae Steele to get the parents to come and finish the sessions. SW Renae Steele has tried on numerous occasions to set up a time to visit the mother and her family, with little cooperation.’

The name of the petitioner on this motion is Mary Henderson as authorized Represenative of the director. The correct box is checked. ( I guess she learned after that one case was vacated)

After this petition was filed the mother took the girls to The psychologist for their appointments and DSS dismissed the petition. How is it that they could file a petition for medical neglect for this, but not for the condition of the girl’s teeth and the mother’s failure to take them to the dentist?

April 16, 2007 DSS court hearing on the petition, the petition was dismissed per DSS request. Neither us nor our attorney, nor the father and stepmom of my stepdaugher’s sister were notified of the dismissal. Renee Steel would only talk to the mother and basically ignored the rest of us. So much for ‘family friendly policy.’

May 1, 2007 Appointment with the psychologist. My husband and I, The father and stepmom of the other daugher showed up, but DSS, specifically, Renae Steele and the mother did not. Since DSS, specifically, Renae Steele didn’t show up the appointment had to be rescheduled, and this after they had just filed a petition for the mother missing appointments with the same psychologist…. a complete waste of our time and gas money. My husband also lost his job due to missing work to make this appointment.

May 4, 2007 Appointment with the psychologist. My husband, me, The father and stepmom agains showed up, the mother was again a no show and DSS, specifically, Renae Steele was 1 and a half hours late. During this meeting we were told that the mother has a severe personality disorder that no amount of medication or therapy can help. We were also told that the psychologist could find no evidence of abuse or neglect. I was told by the psychologist that the videotaping had an adverse effect on my stepdaughter’s wellbeing. And my husband was told that it was wrong for him to call his daughter and leave a message stating, ‘hey baby, its daddy, I love you and miss you, see you soon.’ Because it upsets the mother’s significant other. Renae Steele lay, slouched down in her chair the whole time, to the point that the Dr. Powell finally asked her if she was going to go to sleep. Dr. Powell rushed us out the door because he needed to pick up a prescription, but before he could leave me and the other stepmom asked him point blank, if the girls needed counseling, to which he replied, NO.

I think I should point out here that the pick up and drop off’s occuring at the police department were court Ordered, by Judge David V. Byrd as were my husband’s phone calls to his daughter. He was ordered phone visitation at least 2 times per week. So they are also stating that the court was guilty of neglect for ordering it. That would be my opinion.

Dr. Powell, also condemned me for calling the mother and informing her of two dental appointments and that we would not be helping her pay for the next one because we had paid to have the teeth extracted. He quoted annimosity on my part. These phone calls are recorded and I can assure I did nothing wrong, all I did was try to get the mother to take the child to the dentist and tell her that it was her turn to pay, since we had paid the last time.

First I might have been snotty, but I was the one who witnesses the pain my stepdaughter went through having teeth I and J extracted, I was the one who heard her scream and held her when she cried. I think after experiencing that I had a right to be a little upset about the neglect her mother had put her through for not taking her to the dentist.

Second, no one has ever stated that my stepdaughter heard these messages, therefore it had no effect on her at all. But if I had not set up appointments for her dental care, if I had not have pushed the issue then I would have been just as guilty of neglect as the mother. Someone had to make sure this child got to the dentist.

If I had not had pushed the issue, who knows when her mother would have taken her to the dentist. My stepdaughter’s sister didn’t finally get to the dentist until her last appointment with the psychologist, almost a year after DSS received the report from her dad and stepmom about her.

June 19, 2007 We received letters in the mail today from DSS stating that we had been substantiated against for emotional abuse. It states:

‘This letter is to notify you that our agency has completed the child protective services investigation on the above-named children, and after careful consideration or recommendations from the psychologist, we found evidence of emotional abuse. Therefore, the case is being substantiated against you. This case will be tranferred to a treatment Social Worker. Please contact this agency if you have questions.’

It is signed by

Renae Steele CPS SWIII and Mary Henderson Social Worker Supervisor

On June 22, 2007 I sent the director an e-mail and asked to appeal the substantiation against us. It stated:

‘Dear Mr. Bumgarner:

We want to appeal the decision your office has made against us. This finding does not follow DSS policy and neither has your office in the course of this investigation. I would appreciate it if you could send me the information I need to appeal this. I believe there is a time limit on appealing these decision, so your quick response would be deeply appreciated.’

On June 29, 2007, We received a letter from the Donnie Bumgarner stating:

‘On behalf of the Wilkes County Department of Social Services, I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that I have reviewed the Child Protective Services Investigation involving the above named child. The decision to substantiate emotional abuse against you was mailed by mistake and I apologize for this error. The Department of Social Services did find evidence to substantiate neglect against you due to the child living in an environment injurious to her welfare.’

July 2, 2007 I again wrote to Mr.Bumgarner,requesting to appeal his decision. I also informed him that his department’s decision does not fit the criteria of North Carolina’s Welfare Policy or the criteria of the North Carolina General Statutes. I further stated:

‘I have thoroughly investigated Welfare policy and law since the beginning of this case. During my research I found that your substantiated finding of neglect against us does not meet the criteria of neglect under North Carolina policy. I am again asking you to review your findings and to remove these findings against us. I feel that your findings are based on retaliatory motives because we have complained about your department and your failure to follow welfare law, state law and policy. I believe you are trying to find us guilty of wrong doing to discredit our complaint against you. Your inability to ‘pick’ an abuse that we have committed, proves this point to me.’

On September 20, 2007 I received a letter from Donnie Bumgarner, that stated:

‘Re: Review of Neglect Substatiation

I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that the Wilkes County Department of Social Services has reviewed, as requested, the decision to substantiate neglect against you due the child living in an environment injurious to her welfare. Following the review, it has been determined that the decision to substantiate neglect should not be changed. I trust this information will be helpful to you.’

I have written to The director several more times, asking the the substantiation be removed from us. My request December 13, 2007 was after finding the forged safety assessment. It stated:

 

‘Dear Mr. Bumgarner:

I am once again writing to ask you to reconsider your finding of neglect against us. I think in light of the current situation it is only proper for you to do so. I am of course referring to Allison Baker’s forging of my husband’s name, falsifying a safety assessment and arrest for Felony Obstruction of Justice.

I think it is also important for you to consider the following.

First, The psychologist’s findings in his report are different from what he stated to us. He did not include the fact that the mother has a severe personality disorder that no amount of therapy or medication can help. Dr. Powell also stated in his report that the girls needed therapy, but We specifically asked Dr. Powell if the girls needed any therapy and he told us no. Also Allison Baker was the first person to meet with the doctor and I have serious concerns about what she may have told him.

Second, I think that Linda Brooks and your department are now fully aware of who the instigator is in this situation. If the mother will not co-operate with DSS, who can take away her children, why do you believe that she will work with us?

Finally, the findings that you have listed do not meet the statutory requirements of neglect, you can not find people guilty of neglect because they do not get along with the other parent. If that was the case you would have to file against anyone going through a custody dispute or divorced. We have tried repeatedly to get along with the mother, we do not talk to her because when we even say hello she is verbally abusive to us in front of the girls.

I think with out a doubt considering the arrest of Allison Baker, that you and your department need to admit that this investigation was tainted, bias and improper, you cannot, therefore in good conscience keep the neglect substantiation against us. It is wrong, you know it, I know and other people are beginning to see it too.’

Then after receiving yet another letter from Mr. Bumgarner, stating that they would not remove the substantiation against us, I wrote January 29, 2008:

‘Dear Mr. Bumgarner:

I received your letter RE: Review of Substantiated Child Neglect Investigation, today January 29, 2008 and I must say that I am very disappointed in your decision not to change your findings in light of Allison Baker’s arrest and the forged document by your department.

Yes your department, Allison Baker was your employee and you are responsible for her actions. You will not even admit that your department’s investigation is tainted by her actions, you will not admit or take responsibility for what has occurred in this case and that is wrong. You expect everyone else to be accountable for their actions, admit what they have done wrong and fix it, but when it comes to you, your employees and your department you will not admit your wrong doings, accept responsibility or even apologize when you have wronged someone.

Your department has wronged us! Your substantiation against us is unfounded, need I remind you that the first sentence in the psychologist’s evaluation is ‘ I could find no evidence of abuse or neglect.’ Furthermore you are relying on Allison Baker’s investigation and I believe it has already been proven that she was not doing her job and breaking the law.

I am once again asking you to remove the substantiation against us, , you cannot substantiated against people merely to cover your own wrong doings. Your neglect finding against us DOES NOT meet statutory requirements, it is unfounded, it is I believe an abuse of power, used only to discredit our complaints against your department.

I believe you need to step out of our case and assign it to a different county, you and your department are bias against us, Allison Baker has been arrested and charged for her illegal activities and I believe that others in your department were directly involved in her wrong doings and knew about them, yet you do nothing.

If justice, fairness and doing what is right is your intention you will remove the substantiation against us and admit the wrong doings in your investigation.’

We still have not had a response to this last e-mail as of this date, May 5, 2008.

We have complied with everything that DSS has ever asked us to do. Even though we do not agree with their decision, we have allowed Linda Brooks (from WCDSS) and Nikki Hull, from Surry county into our home, we have done a case plan, the works. We did all of this even though we have done nothing wrong. During the ‘family treatment’ the mother has still failed to comply and/or work with DSS. They have had to fight with her every step of the way! They cannot even get along with her, yet they substantiate neglect against us because, ‘we can’t get along.’ I dare say then they need to substatiate against themselves and any person going through a divorce or child custody dispute.

I e-mailed the director again on April 23, 2008. It stated as follows:

‘Dear Mr. Bumgarner:

I am once again writing to you to ask you to remove the unfounded substantiation that you and your department have made against us. The substantiation of neglect for an environment injurious does not met statutory guidelines…nor does it fall under any decisions in case law. I have researched this thoroughly and cannot find any law or case law that states that the parents inability to get along constitutes neglect.

Furthermore, we did not do anything to have a substantiation of neglect found against us. The only thing that we did was try to protect these little girls. As I have stated before, we do not cause a scene in front of my stepdaughter, we do not yell, scream, cuss, or any such thing in front of her or any other child. You are punishing us for the mother’s actions and that is wrong.

I would also like to point out, that even though we have disagreed with your decision and believe it to be wrong, even though one of your caseworkers committed a crime against us, even though we know that we have done absolutely nothing wrong. We have continued to work with DSS, never once have we refused to do anything your agency requested of us. Even though we feel that your department has judged us unfairly, conducted itself in a bias and unethical manner, and that your department has constantly broken welfare policy and statutory law, we have still tried to work with you.

The mother on the other hand has not complied with anything you have ever asked her to do, until she was threatened with court action. I have stated it before, if she will not work with you, when you can take her children, then how do you expect us to work with her. She has been difficult for your own employees to work with, even though she knows that you could step in and take her children at anytime.

We have tried everything in our power to work with the mother, she is not capable of working with anyone. Yet you still refuse to see that we are not the problem here. We are basically victims of a controlling, demanding, verbally abusive person, who has a severe personality disorder. Every action that we have taken has been a form of protection.

We reported child abuse and neglect to try and protect these little girls, we videotaped the pick up and drop offs to protect ourselves from prosecution, due to thr mother’s lies, she would lie and say that my husband or me was threatening her, cussing at her and it wasn’t true, but without the tapes we would not have been able to prove it. He could have gone to jail because of her malicious lies.

I videotaped the bruises on my stepdaugher to have proof of them, so that we could protect her. I did this under the advisement of your social worker and you persecuted me for it. What else was I supposed to do, when I called and reported the bruises and no one would come to the house, no one would help us protect her. No one cared, no one seemed to notice that the videotape did indeed show a child with bruises, exactly as I described.

I have attached some of the welfare policy here in order to show you that nothing we have done falls into the category of environment injurious, as a matter of fact, we have done nothing that falls into any category of abuse or neglect! The substantiation against us is wrong and it should be removed. Agencies are expected to adhere to laws and policies when administering and designating CPS roles and responsibilities. This has not occurred in this case.’

On April 28, 2008 I was informed by Linda Brooks, that they are closing the case. She said they did not care if the family treatment was completed or not, for her to close the case. All should would state was that it had come from high up. I asked her what our risk assessment was and she stated that it was low and I then stated that they never should have substantiated against us, according to their own policy. She also stated that the mother’s was not high, but it was not low either. Linda Brooks also stated that she is to have the case closed by Friday, but she wasn’t sure if she could do it because she had to write the case summary for the Judge.

I requested a copy of the risk assessment, the strengths and weeknesses and a copy of her summary to the Judge. I have mixed feelings about the closing of our case. I am happy that they are closing it, because against us and the other father and stepmom, it never should have been opened. We never should have been substatitated against. I am also upset that they are closing the case against the mother, she has never complied with them at all and it is my belief that they should have filed a petition against her a long time ago. Also so long as DSS was involved the girl’s were at least watched somewhat by them. I stated this to Linda Brooks, not in so many words, but I told her my concerns.

I have had no response from Donnie Bumgarner, regarding my last two e-mails.

May 16, 2008, I received a letter from the Wilkes County Department of Social Services informing us that the case had been closed it states:

‘Dear father and stepmom,

I am writing to inform you (both) that on May 14, 2008, Team 1, Children Protective Services Unit, closed the case on your child(ren) due to: Your willingness to pursue counseling for your daughter, thus lowering her risk factors, your expression of concern and determination for Lydia to receive assistance in her school work, and monitoring her care from her mother.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at phone number .

Sincerely,

Linda Brooks

Team 1 In Home Treatment/Social Worker

Mary Henderson

Team 1 CPS Supervisor’

Now why, if the mother is such a responsible parent, do we need to monitor my stepdaughter’s care from her?

Furthermore, in the Family Risk Assessment of Abuse and Neglect that I requested and received a copy of the same day. It states that we only ‘minimally participated in pursuing objectives in service agreement. This is an outright lie. WE always complied with anything and everything that they asked us to do. For the Risk Reassessment dated 11-07-07 it states as a reason for Discretionary override: age and previous report static but not pursuing all goals outlined in cft of 9-11-07…there was no cft on 9-11-07, or 11-07-07 the cft wasn’t completed until 1-08-08 two months later.

On this assessment we had a total score of 3, mainly just because of this lie. This is just them trying to justify leaving this case open against welfare policy. They use the same reason on 3-27-08, but in this one they do not mark R8 and R9 with (b) Minimal participaion in pursuing objectives in service agreement…….1…So I guess basically the only reason it was left open then is my husband’s age. Under 29…we had a 1 on this reassessment.

Everything that they have said and done from day one has been a policy violation, they have lied, deceived, forged documents, broke the law…everything. Yet no one will do anything about it.

I mean after all they made us into child abusers to ensure that no one would take our complaints too seriously! WE ARE NOT CHILD ABUSERS…we are trying to protect these little girls. We would not go through the lengths that we have to get this story out and have them investigated if we were. We have been treated like our voice doesn’t matter, I mean they are DSS, they never do anything wrong and we must be just disgruntled ‘clients.’ Well we are not disgruntled ‘clients’ we are victims of their violations and lies and according to the DA handling Social Worker 1′s case, victims of a crime committed by their department.

On May 21, 2008, I received a letter from Nikki Hull, the Surry County Social Worker assigned to us by Wilkes County. This letter contridicts and proves that the Wilkes County Department of Social Services lied during their assessment of our case. It states as follows:

‘Dear Mr. and Mrs. :

The starting point for asessing a family’s readiness for termination of protective services is based on the family meeting specific objectives designed to alleviate the problems causing abuse or neglect in the family environment. Surry County has been a point of contact in you case based on a decision made by Wilkes County DSS.

On 1-08-08 the Wilkes County DSS developed a Family Services Case Plan with your family. Your family has been compliant with all recommendations made by Wilkes County DSS and have attended all scheduled meetings for child safety planning.

On 5-14-08 Wilkes County made a decision to close the In-Home services for your family. The Surry County Department of Social Services agrees with the decision that the your family has satisfactorily met the goals set forth in their Family Services Case Plan and achieved a safe environment for their children. Since no other problem has emerged that would interfere with this family’s ability to provide adequate care and supervision to the children, it is the Surry County Department of Social Services final opinion that your family is ready for the next phase of protective services, ‘Termination’.

On 5-14-08 Case # 44, 541 was terminated for Child Protective Services. There will be no further contact with your family regarding the issues taht led to the Department of Social Services involvement in the above-mentioned matter. Please feel free to contact me if any needs arise in the future.

Sincerely,

Nikki Hull

Social Worker III

Donna Key

Social Worker Supervisor’

We have voiced our complaints numerous times and we do not feel we are being listened to. I have contacted, North Carolina DSS, Specifically Phyllis Fulton, Paul Waddle, Edith Thomas-Pullen, Chris Downings office in Atlanta GA, Carlis V. Williams head of AFC in Atlanta, Ruth Parker in Atlanta GA, Mike Levitts office in Washington DC. and numerous other people who will not do anything to rectify the situation. They will admit that what has been done is wrong, but tell us to call someone else. The lack of reponsibility in this case is mind boggling and quite frankly, in my opinion, idiots are running the services that are suppose to protect our children and failing miserbly at it.

We also feel that there is a whole lot of ass covering occurring in this case, at all levels. This in not just a simple case of a Social Worker breaking the law, but a complete and total miscarriage of justice. We have been maliciously prosecuted by WCDSS, without even the benefit of a trial, we have been found guilty of, in our opinion, one of the worse things you can be found guilty of. WCDSS needs to be investigated for their handling of this case and for many other that I have heard of since I began researching them. WE want the substatiation against us removed, we did nothing wrong and should not be punished for the actions of others.

The only time anyone shows the slightest concern for DSS policy violations is when a child that they have received reports on dies…it should not take that long. The moment policy violations are brought to their attention they should be investigated, at even the hint of such a thing, they should be investigated. It is too late to save a child when they are already dead. A child should not have to die for an investigation to occur. When DSS acts as they have in our case, children die. When they make mistakes as they have in our case, it is the children who pay for it.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

 

 

   

 

 

DISCLAIMER:

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work
in this BLOG is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
GRG [Ref.http:// www.law. cornell.edu/ uscode/17/ 107.shtml]
 
 CPSreformRIBBON-1
 
 I have created this blog to educate the public on what happens to children when CPS fails to do their job.  In order to do so, I must place the entire news/blog story here.  I do this for a simple purpose…many times after I have posted a link, that link was broken and those stories cannot be found.  In order to to show the public how many children are dying with CPS involvement or other types of corruption occurring in the CPS system, I must have all the stories in one place in order to make the impact need to try and create a public out cry for change,  I need these stories so that people can see exactly how many children it is, how many social workers are arrested, how many laws are broken.

  
 
 
 
 

 

 

There is no infringment intended at all. I do always provide the link to the stories and the author of the story so that they receive the credit for their work that the deserve.  My intent is to try and use these stories to educate the public and hopefully create enough awareness to change the laws and the accountability of CPS.    I can be reached at lawdoll1@gmail.com.

Ask yourself:  If these Departments of Social Services cannot handle child fatality disclosures, in accordance with the law, which frankly, requires writing a summary of DSS involvement with a child that any 8th grade English student could write…how can we possibly trust them to investigate child abuse, neglect, and maltreatment cases?

Child death disclosure hindered by Bureaucratic circumventing, ignorance? Part 4

Read Part 12, and 3

Part 4: Failure to meet disclosure criteria.

Is mandatory disclosure, being thwarted by insufficient findings and information?

Is the Department of Social Services hiding mistakes and systematic problems behind the curtain of confidentiality?

Failure to meet disclosure criteria

Although several of the disclosure summaries were lacking the necessary content to comply with the statutory definition of facts and information that shall be released, one department completely failed to abide by the statute, in not only the information and facts they were supposed to release, but in denying disclosure in cases, without just cause and good faith. 

Read more of part 4

In Memory of Shinaye Smith

DSS Asked To Investigate Shortly Before East Charlotte Child Killed

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/dss-asked-to-investigate-shortly-before-east-charl/nG9WR/

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — 

School officials in Mecklenburg County reported signs of abuse more than a month before a 3-year-old girl died from internal injuries.Police arrested 20-year-old Andrew Cortez Price on Friday and charged him with murder in the death of Shinaye Smith. Officers said Price is the boyfriend of Smith’s mother.Eyewitness News uncovered an internal email sent out by Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools officials on the day Smith died. The email states: “On September 29th, the student (Smith) came to school with a bruised and swollen left side of the face.”

Hickory Grove Elementary School’s nurse reported the incident to the Department of Social Services in Mecklenburg County. But, according to the e-mail, DSS returned the report, saying “the allegations reported, if true, do not fall within any of the North Carolina statutory definitions of abuse, neglect or dependency.”

DSS officials said they could not comment on specific cases, but said each claim of abuse is investigated through a strict protocol.

The statutory definitions of “abuse, neglect or dependency” are available online. Click here.

You can read the entire juvenile code by clicking here.

RELATED STORY: Warrants Issued In Child’s Death That Appeared Natural

In Memory of Jalenthia Caldwell

Man accused of killing girlfriend’s baby

http://www.wcnc.com/news/local/Man-accused-of-killing-girlfriends-baby-78234747.html

by NewsChannel 36 Staff

Posted on December 1, 2009 at 12:57 PM

Updated Tuesday, Dec 1 at 1:03 PM

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Police are searching for a man who’s accused of shaking his girlfriend’s baby to death. 

Charlotte-Mecklenburg police say Randy Moorehead is charged with first-degree murder and felony child abuse. 

Lattayne Caldwell says she left her 22-month-old daughter, Jalenthia, in Moorehead’s care when she went to work on Friday. When she returned home, Caldwell says, she thought her child was sleeping.

“My baby was in a coma having a seizure, couldn’t look at me, couldn’t breathe, wasn’t swallowing and I mean I’m like, what in the world?” said Caldwell. “I’m thinking she’s asleep because this what I was told and she is dying.”

A funeral will be held for Jalenthia on Saturday.

In Memory of Demytre Rashaad Pendleton Jr. (D.J.)

January 20, 2009-September 9, 2011

Mother now facing charges relating to 2-year-old son’s death

http://www.wbtv.com/story/15428149/man-charged-with-murder-in-toddlers-death?clienttype=printable

Posted: Sep 09, 2011 2:36 PM EDTUpdated: Oct 09, 2011 2:36 PM EDT

By Jeff Rivenbark, Web Content Producer  

CHARLOTTE, NC (WBTV) – Police have arrested the mother of a toddler who died earlier this month.

 Ariacna Romero, 21, was taken into custody Thursday night on felony accessory charges in the murder of her 2-year-old son.

A friend of Romero, James Gregory Cleveland, 25, is charged with felony child abuse inflicting serious bodily injury, and murder in relation to the death of Demytre Rashaad Pendleton Jr.

According to the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, Demytre’s mother took her son to Carolinas Medical Center-Pineville on Tuesday, Sept. 6. Due to the severity of the boy’s injuries, he was airlifted to CMC-Main.

An examination at the hospital revealed injuries in which hospital staff believed were serious enough to involve police. The next day, CMPD detectives with the Youth Crimes Unit were called to CMC to investigate how the child was injured.

Demytre died at the hospital two days later as a result of his injuries.

This latest incident, however, is not the first time the child has ended up in the hospital due to a severe injury.

Officers were called to CMC-Main on August 24, 2011, at 10:24 p.m. after Demytre was admitted with a skull fracture and several bruises which police deemed possibly consistent with a fall.

At that time, detectives with the CMPD’s Youth Crimes Unit were assigned to the case.

The child was treated and released from CMC-Main while detectives continued to investigate. 

Following Demytre’s death on Friday, CMPD Homicide Unit detectives charged James Gregory Cleveland in connection with the child’s death. Cleveland is being held at the Mecklenburg County Jail without bond.

Police said Cleveland is a friend of Demytre’s mother and he is not related to the toddler.

If you have information about this incident, call 704-432-TIPS and speak directly to a Homicide Unit Detective or call Crime Stoppers at 704-334-1600.

In Memory of Marcus Markee Davis Jr.

DSS reveals history of abuse following death of baby

Posted: Jul 13, 2011 10:24 AM EDTUpdated: Aug 12, 2011 10:25 AM EDT

By Jeff Rivenbark, Web Content Producer

CHARLOTTE, NC (WBTV) – The Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services confirmed on Monday a history of abuse in the home of a child who police say was fatally injured by his mother more than a week ago.

Shannon Shmir Merriman, 22, was arrested Wednesday, July 13, at Carolinas Medical Center where her 1-year-old son, Marcus Markee Davis Jr., was hospitalized. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department initially charged Merriman with felony Child Abuse.

When her baby died the next day, police issued a murder warrant against her.

According to the CMPD, the child was injured at Merriman’s apartment on High Meadow Lane on Sunday, July 10.

Neighbor Anaya Ellington said Merriman came to her apartment to call 911 around 2:30 p.m.

“She had the baby in her arms, she was was crying ‘My baby, my baby,’” Ellington recalled. “I heard her tell 911 he was playing in the kitchen and hit his head on the cabinet.”

On Monday, July 18, the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services released a statement saying they were first contacted in June 2010 regarding the welfare of Marcus Davis Jr.

DSS says there were allegations the child’s parents were involved in substance abuse and there were concerns about domestic violence and the child being neglected.

DSS claims it received a report in August 2010 alleging domestic violence between Marcus Davis Sr. and Merriman. The case was transferred for ongoing in-home child protective services.

In September 2010, DSS was informed the child “sustained an injury caused by non-accidental trauma”, or child abuse.

Marcus Davis Sr. was charged with felony child abuse and arrested. He later pleaded guilty to the associated criminal charges.

DSS claims it continued checking in on Merriman and her son until the case was closed in April 2011 after Merriman “completed services for domestic violence, addressed substance abuse concerns, and completed employment readiness training.”

In May 2011, DSS was notified about an allegation of neglect involving the child. DSS was told the father had returned to Merriman’s home. After repeated visits to the home, DSS said “there were no concerns noted about the care of Marcus, Jr.” The case was later closed by DSS in June 2011.

DSS said it received yet another report alleging abuse and neglect after the child was admitted to CMC on July 10.

When Merriman appeared in court on Friday, July 15, her mother stood up and told the judge her daughter was a good mother. She asked the judge to have mercy.

Merriman was assigned a public defender. Due to the severity of the charges, the judge said she would not be released on bond. She remains in custody at the Mecklenburg County Jail.

In Memory of Zione Washington

Man pleads guilty to abuse, killing of girlfriend’s baby

by Gary L. Wright / Charlotte Observer

Posted on March 12, 2011 at 8:53 AM

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Michael Walker, accused of killing his girlfriend’s 19-month-old child, told the judge Friday he deserves his punishment.

“I just want to say I’m sorry,” Walker, his wrists in handcuffs and his legs shackled, said moments before being sentenced. “I can’t bring him back. I’ve got to live with this. I’m embarrassed.”

Then he added: “I’m getting what I deserve.”

Superior Court Judge Bob Bell sentenced Walker to a minimum of 28 years and a maximum of 36 years in prison.

Walker, 33, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and felony child abuse in connection with the April 2010 killing of Zione Washington. He admitted that the abuse of Shamika Washington’s son was especially heinous, atrocious and cruel. That admission exposed him to more prison time.

Walker also pleaded guilty to felony child abuse of Shamika Washington’s 21/2-year-old son, Michael.

Mecklenburg Assistant District Attorney Gabrielle Macon told the judge that Shamika Washington had gone out about 2 a.m. April 12 to buy a pack of cigarettes. When she got back to the apartment, on Teal Point Drive off North Sharon Amity Road, she took a 15-minute shower. She then entered the bedroom and noticed Zione lying on his back. Vomit was coming from his nose, his lips were blue and he was not breathing.

Washington began CPR and told her boyfriend to call 911.

As Medic emergency personnel approached the apartment about 3 a.m., Walker came toward them with Zione in his arms. The child was transported to Presbyterian Hospital. Both Medic and hospital staff saw what appeared to be bruising on Zione, Macon said. Zione never regained a pulse or began breathing and was pronounced dead at 3:25 a.m.

Macon told the judge that Walker confessed to beating Zione. The prosecutor said that Walker, when confronted with photographs of the child’s injuries, told detectives that Zione had started crying after Washington left the apartment.

Walker recalled telling Zione to go back to sleep but got frustrated and hit him with a plastic bowling pin and on the chest several times with an open hand and closed fist, Macon said.

He said he then pulled the covers over Zione and went back to watching TV.

Macon told the judge that Zione had bruises on his face, chest, abdomen and forehead. Detectives found three plastic bowling pins in the bedroom closet, the prosecutor said. One of them was crushed.

Shamika Washington wasn’t at the sentencing of her son’s killer. Macon told the judge that Zione’s mother had moved to Georgia and authorities had been unable to contact her.

Defense attorney Susan Weigand told the judge that Walker was intoxicated and had been smoking marijuana on the night of Zione’s killing. She said Walker told police that Zione’s mother had nothing to do with her child’s death.

“Mr. Walker is a very tormented soul,” Weigand said. “He is extremely sorry.”

In Memory of Nakyiah Chapman and Na’jhae Parker

DSS got call on Chapmans in September

by Lisa Hammersly | Charlotte Observer

Posted on April 1, 2010 at 2:20 PM

CHARLOTTE, N.C.– Mecklenburg’s Department of Social Services received a complaint in September regarding the Chapman family — where four members died in a recent murder-suicide spree — but decided not to open a case on the family.

The agency said Thursday that workers weren’t able to take the case and provide protective services because the complaint “did not meet the legal definition of abuse, neglect or dependency,” according to an agency spokesman.

Authorities believe Kenneth Jermaine Chapman, 33, suffocated his wife, 35-year-old Nateesha Ward Chapman, more than two weeks ago in a Charlotte apartment where the family formerly lived.

Within a day of her killing, police say Chapman also killed two children: his wife’s daughter, 13-year-old Na’Jhae Parker, and the couple’s own daughter, 1-year-old Nakyiah Jael Chapman. Chapman fatally shot himself late Monday when police arrived to investigate a missing person report. Two other children survived.

Following the murders, DSS filed a petition with Mecklenburg County Juvenile Court and obtained protective custody of the surviving children, ages 10 and 2.

DSS officials didn’t respond immediately to questions about what the September complaint entailed and whether the agency has reviewed the screening process since the crimes.

In Memory of Josiah and Gabriel Hawthorne

DSS letter shows contact with mother charged in deaths

http://charlotte.news14.com/content/622884/dss-letter-shows-contact-with-mother-charged-in-deaths

CHARLOTTE — The Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services released a letter Friday outlining the timeline of their involvement with Orgal Opata.

The 26-year-old is being held under a $1 million bond. She’s charged with two counts of murder and felony child abuse after her 1- and 2-year-old sons died in a house fire Sunday. Two of her other children survived and police say she left the four children home alone.

In Friday’s letter, DSS officials say social workers were first notified in June 2008 that Orpata’s children were left unattended. They recommended services for Orpata and closed that case in early August 2008.

Then, last October, DSS was again notified that Orpata’s children were found at home alone. Officials said they referred Orpata’s case to Family Intervention Protective Services and assigned a social worker to make regular contact.

DSS said Orpata cooperated with community-based service providers and indicated the children were receiving appropriate supervision.

On Friday afternoon, Orpata’s case involving the child neglect charges from last year was continued until late April.

Friday night, dozens of people came together for a vigil to remember Opata’s two infants who were killed in a fire last week. (Watch video)

In Memory of Ellijah Burger

Toddler beaten, killed at motel

by By ANN SHERIDAN / NewsChannel 36 

Posted on August 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM

Updated Sunday, Nov 1 at 4:22 PM

Arrest in toddler’s murder

A man who was watching a toddler at a west Charlotte motel beat the 23-month-old to death, according to Charlotte-Mecklenburg police.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A father who was watching his 23-month-old son at a west Charlotte motel beat the toddler to death, according to Charlotte-Mecklenburg police. The man is now facing murder charges.

Detectives say Andre Earl Hampton was watching Ellijah Burger, who is his son, while the boy’s mother was at work.

“I saw the mom when they brought him out. She was screaming and crying, ‘Oh my God, not my baby,’” said Elizabeth Dickerson, a resident at the AARCS Residence Suites Hotel on South Tryon Street.

“She came out screaming. It gives me chills all over,” she said.

Jawone Carr watched as Medic tried to save Burger. “I’d seen paramedics come out with the little guy in their arms. He was limp, like he was passed out or something,” he said.”He had whips all over his body.”

People who live at the AARCS Residence Suites say Burger and his family were new to the area.Still many already knew the mom and can’t get the image out of their minds.

“What she was going through, I can’t imagine. I don’t want to imagine it,” said resident David Taylor.

CMPD says they responded to a call from the hotel around 6:45 p.m. Tuesday.Medic tried to save Burger by administering CPR, but he was pronounced dead at Carolinas Medical Center.

Detectives say Hampton willingly went to police headquarters where he was questioned. He was later charged with murder.

His first court appearance is scheduled for Thursday.

Police say there were other children in the room at the time of the crime.Those children are safe and in police custody, according to investigators on the scene.

Hampton’s record shows he was arrested last April on a misdemeanor assault charge.

“I don’t believe it. He wouldn’t hurt anybody,” said a woman who lives near one of the homes Hampton’s mother owns. “He’s not the type to do something like that. He was quiet and he really cared for those kids.”

(NewsChannel 36 reporter Richard DeVayne contributed to this report.)

In Memory of Tiffany Ranae and Aaliyah Faye Wright

Baby born to murdered Charlotte teen dies

Posted: Sep 14, 2009 7:30 AM EDTUpdated: Oct 31, 2009 4:03 PM EDT

CHARLOTTE, NC (WBTV) – The baby of a 15-year-old teen who was murdered last week passed away this weekend nearly one week after her mother’s tragic death.

Also, Monday WBTV learned that the suspect in the alleged rape of the murdered teen had been appointed the teen’s temporary guardian by the courts earlier this year.

Tiffany Ranae Wright was shot and killed on Monday, Sept. 14., while waiting for her school bus along Mallard Park Drive in north Charlotte.  

Wright died at Carolinas Medical Center and doctors were able to deliver her unborn child.  The premature infant was about four weeks old when born, but died after nearly one week.

The baby, named Aaliyan Faye Wright, died Sunday morning.  A hospital spokesperson was unable to comment this weekend on the exact cause of death.

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department says detectives are consulting with the medical examiner and the district attorney to determine if the suspect in the case should be charged with the child’s death. 

Tiffany Wright’s funeral had been scheduled for Tuesday, but has been delayed. The Department of Social Services is now handling the arrangements, according to Stanley Mills with Grier Funeral services. 

Wright’s adopted brother and temporary guardian, Royce Mitchell, 36, turned himself into police one week ago just hours after her death.  Police charged him for allegedly raping Wright earlier this year and they are still calling him a person of interest in connection with her murder. 

According to court documents obtained Monday by WBTV, Wright’s adoptive mother, Alma Wright, died on January 25, 2009.  The courts gave Alma Wright’s biological son, Royce Mitchell, temporary guardianship of Tiffany Wright.  She went to live with him and his wife, Andria.

The courts said Mitchell would remain Tiffany Wright’s temporary guardian until home study could be conducted by the Department of Social Services to determine if he should have permanent custody. 

Last week, Tiffany Wright’s paternal grandmother, Shirley Boston, publicly blamed the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department for not protecting her granddaughter from Mitchell.

The CMPD said they had been investigating the rape allegation against him for nearly two months, but they did not file charges against him until after Wright’s death due to a backlog of sexual assault cases.  He was charged with statutory rape and taking indecent liberties with a child. Authorities also said they were looking into whether Mitchell was the father of Wright’s baby. 

WBTV also spoke to a woman from Shelby,North Carolina who petitioned the court for custody of Wright.

“I wanted her to come and stay with me because I wanted to give her the tools she needed to be successful, her desire was to be an attorney,” said Cruceta Jeffeirs. ” I’m still not comprehending , grasping why would somebody want to harm her or hurt her, I don’t get that.”

Last week, the City of Charlotte released a statement concerning Mitchell’s employment status.  He was hired as a member of the Charlotte Department of Transportation’s street maintenance crew in 2007.  A spokeswoman for the city said Mitchell was terminated for “falsifying his employment application.” 

Spokeswoman Kim McMillan said the city checked his records for criminal offenses at the local and state level.  Some of his federal records were reviewed but not all of them, she said.  

“To ensure a more comprehensive review of all applicants, the City will expand background checks to include a search of federal offenses throughout the country,” McMillan said.  

On Tuesday, Mitchell appeared in court and he said nothing as the judge read the charges filed against him.  Mitchell appeared over closed-circuit TV and did not appear to show any emotion according to WBTV Reporter Dedrick Russell who was present in the courtroom. 

This isn’t Mitchell’s first encounter with the law.  According to the Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office, Andria Mitchell filed a domestic violence order of protection against him on May 6, 2008.  She alleges that he threw her out of their bed, punched her in the face leaving her with a black eye, bruised jaw bone and a headache.  In 2006, he was acquitted in a 1998 drug-related murder in Buffalo, New York.

Wright was an 11th grade student at Hawthorne High School which offers a variety of programs including one designed for students who are pregnant.  Additional counselors were at the school last week providing assistance to students and staff. 

The school held a joint memorial service on Thursday for her and Ja’ron McGill.  McGill died a few months ago in a separate and unrelated gun violence incident.  Following the service, students and staff went outside to release purple balloons in memory of the two students. 

If you have any information about this shooting, call 704-332-TIPS or call Crime Stoppers at 704-334-1600. 

How system failed 15-year-old gunned down at bus stop

By Christopher D. Kirkpatrick | Charlotte Observer

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Tiffany Wright stood alone in the dark, waiting for her school bus.

It was just before 6 a.m., and her foster grandmother had walked back home to get Tiffany’s water bottle.

Tiffany, 15, was eight months pregnant but determined to stay on track in school. She wanted to be a lawyer. And after just a few weeks at Hawthorne High, she had impressed teachers as smart and ambitious, despite a difficult childhood.

At 5:51, Tiffany sent a text.

“Wheres the bus?”

One stop away, replied her friend, already on the bus.

At 5:55, as the bus lumbered toward Tiffany’s stop, people began calling police to report gunshots.

A school bus dispatcher radioed Tiffany’s bus driver: Change course – something’s happening ahead.

Tiffany lay dead in the road, shot in the head, that morning, Monday, Sept. 14. Her baby girl was delivered at the hospital and lived a week, but died Sunday.

Nobody’s charged in the killings, but police call Tiffany’s adoptive brother, Royce Mitchell, a “person of interest.”

In the months before she died, local agencies took steps aimed at stabilizing her home life and keeping her safe. But her story exposes failures in the system that was supposed to protect her.

Among the missteps:

•In February, a Mecklenburg court clerk appointed Mitchell as Tiffany’s temporary guardian — even though he was a felon who served time in federal prison. He was also tried in 2006 for murder, but found not guilty. And last year, he was accused of domestic violence, though the case was dismissed.

•In July, social workers told police that Mitchell, 36, might have committed statutory rape with Tiffany, but police didn’t question him about it for seven weeks, and didn’t charge him with the rape until after Tiffany was killed.

•This month, Mecklenburg social services failed to cut off communication between Tiffany, who was in foster care, and Mitchell, said a source close to the investigation.

On the day of Tiffany’s killing, Charlotte-Mecklenburg police jailed Mitchell for statutory rape and indecent liberties with a child, naming Tiffany as the victim.

Police defend their work, saying they followed the industry’s best practices – which takes time. Police didn’t feel a need to rush, they say, because they believed Tiffany was secure, hidden in a foster home with no threat to her safety.

Police say it’s hard to prove statutory rape: Of the 262 reports of statutory rape police received over three years, only 16 percent – 42 cases – were accepted by prosecutors.

Experts say statutory rape cases are complicated because they involve victims ages 13, 14 or 15 who often consider themselves voluntary participants in sex with someone at least six years older. So victims can be reluctant to help police.

But child advocates say in cases like Tiffany’s, police should act more aggressively. An immediate arrest sends a signal to a suspect and can persuade them to stay away from victims.

“The cases may be difficult to win, but they’re not difficult to charge,” says Brett Loftis of Charlotte’s Council for Children’s Rights.

UNCC criminologist Paul Friday says: “Often, nothing is done in these kinds of cases because they’re based on improper assumptions about the rationality of someone that age. But the minors are often unaware of disease, birth control and they can be exploited by someone.”

Adopted by foster mother

Tiffany first entered the child welfare system as a toddler in Buffalo, N.Y., when her mother lost custody.

She was adopted at 4 by her foster mother, Alma Wright, an older woman with eight grown children, who was excited about raising another child.

One of Wright’s grown sons was Royce Mitchell, a star quarterback in high school who’d gone on to play for a semi-pro team in Buffalo. But Mitchell also was indicted in 1999 as part of a drug trafficking ring and went to federal prison.

While he was in prison, authorities also charged Mitchell with an earlier murder, but a jury found him not guilty.

In 2004, Alma and Tiffany left Buffalo for North Carolina, settling near Kings Mountain. Tiffany made friends easily at school and church. She ran track at Bessemer City High School.

In 2007, Mitchell was released from prison and followed his mother to North Carolina.

But last fall, Alma Wright got sick. Friends at church helped out with Tiffany, inviting her for dinners and weekends. Tiffany spent time with Mitchell and his wife, too.

Alma Wright died Jan. 25, and Tiffany moved in with the Mitchells in Charlotte.

On Jan. 30, Royce Mitchell asked a Mecklenburg court to appoint him and his wife as Tiffany’s guardians.

On his application, he wrote: “We are seeking guardianship because we were requested to do so by Mrs. Alma Wright before she died.”

He wanted to transfer Tiffany to West Mecklenburg High School.

The court set a hearing for Feb. 5 and appointed a child advocate to study the situation and look after Tiffany’s best interests in court.

There’s no transcript of what happened in court, and the clerk who handled Tiffany’s case declined to discuss his decision.

Frederick Benson, a Mecklenburg assistant clerk of superior court, appointed Mitchell the temporary guardian of Tiffany’s welfare.

It’s unclear if Benson, a lawyer, knew about Mitchell’s criminal background. Court clerks are not required to perform background checks in guardianship cases, says Clerk of Superior Court Martha Curran. It’s up to each clerk to decide what checks are necessary, and they often rely on court-appointed child advocates to advise them in such cases.

Tiffany’s advocate, lawyer Martha Efird, declined to discuss her actions in the case.

It was in the weeks surrounding the Feb. 5 court hearing that Tiffany got pregnant, if hospital estimates are accurate.

But friends say Tiffany, who started at West Mecklenburg High in February, wouldn’t realize for four or five months that she was pregnant.

On Feb. 27, clerk of court Benson ordered DSS to conduct a “home study” of the Mitchell household. Officials won’t release their findings.

But Mitchell didn’t keep custody long, according to several of Tiffany’s friends in King’s Mountain.

In late March, Mitchell left Tiffany at a group home called With Friends in Gastonia, according to Marlene Jefferies and Cruceta Jeffeirs, two adult family friends who watched Tiffany grow up.

The group home wouldn’t confirm that. But the friends say the home reported to social services that Tiffany was abandoned. And she was soon back in foster care.

On March 31, Jeffeirs, a Shelby pastor, wrote a letter to Benson seeking custody of Tiffany: “My desire is to see Tiffany accomplish all the goals that she has set for herself and I believe she can do that in a stable environment with lots of guidance and love.”

DSS officials in Gaston and Mecklenburg won’t discuss Tiffany’s case or answer questions about what steps they took to protect her.

But friends and family say Tiffany was eventually placed in the care of foster parent Susan Barber, in a townhome off Mallard Creek Road in Derita.

By July, it was clear Tiffany was pregnant, friends say.

Barber tried to shield Tiffany from talking to those she believed might be bad influences, according to Tiffany’s cousin Brittany Page. But a source close to the investigation said Tiffany and Mitchell continued communicating.

Despite repeated attempts, Barber could not be reached.

As the school year approached, Tiffany prepared to change schools again, this time to Hawthorne High in Charlotte, which offers a special program for pregnant students.

Delayed investigation

On July 27, social workers reported to police that Royce Mitchell might have committed statutory rape with Tiffany.

It took eight days for a detective to look at the case, and three days more for it to be officially assigned to Teresa Johnson, a detective with CMPD’s youth crime and domestic violence unit.

Another 12 days passed before Johnson interviewed Tiffany.

It’s unclear when detective Johnson discovered Mitchell’s background, but it wasn’t enough to ramp up the investigation. Investigators say they believed Tiffany was safe in a foster home and faced no threats from Mitchell.

Police say their performance in the case followed procedure and met standards.

Police interview alleged victims immediately if the crime has occurred within the previous 72 hours, so they can gather evidence that may remain. But in cases like Tiffany’s – where months had elapsed since the alleged offense – police try to arrange just one interview when children and teen victims of abuse are involved.

Police acknowledge that strategy takes time but minimizes trauma and reduces the chances that young victims might be led into inaccurate testimony by repeated questioning.

Police also let such victims decide when they want to be interviewed at the county’s child-victim center called Pat’s Place. There, specially trained interviewers talk to victims, while social workers, psychologists, police and others watch from another room.

Tiffany chose an Aug. 19 interview. She didn’t say much during the formal interview. But later that day, Johnson won her trust and obtained enough information to move forward with the investigation.

No response from Mitchell

The next day, Aug. 20, the detective made her first call to Mitchell to ask him about the charge, she says. Johnson left a message and gave him a few days to call back.

When Mitchell didn’t respond, she made calls over the next two weeks to social workers and a federal probation officer to ask Mitchell to come talk to police.

Police say they didn’t immediately arrest him because they believed they could get better information if he talked voluntarily.

On Sept. 9, a federal probation official told Johnson that Mitchell was not coming in.

On Sept. 10, a team of social workers, police and other agencies held a standard follow-up meeting to discuss how to proceed in Tiffany’s case.

On Friday, Sept. 11, detective Johnson phoned Mitchell’s wife and left a message. She asked her to call back to discuss Tiffany, Johnson says, but didn’t give details of the rape allegation.

That Monday, Tiffany was shot and killed.

As emergency vehicles rolled to the scene, Tiffany’s school bus was diverted from its normal route. But the students could see flashing lights. Tiffany’s friends on the bus, Cimone Black and Tamia Corpening, began to worry.

“I kept texting her phone…,” Cimone said. Then she started calling, but all she got was voice mail.

The bus continued on to Hawthorne. For Tamia, the hourlong ride was excruciating.

Nobody said a word.

Staff writers Liz Chandler and Ely Portillo and researcher Maria David contributed.

In Memory of Canell “C.J. Durant

Father Arrested In Child’s Death, Neighbors Stunned

 Updated: 7:25 a.m. Friday, April 1, 2011 | Posted: 1:46 p.m. Thursday, March 31, 2011

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — 

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/father-arrested-in-childs-death-neighbors-stunned/nGRm6/

The father of a 4-month-old boy, 33-year-old Christopher Durant, was arrested Thursday morning in connection with the infant’s death.Charlotte-Mecklenburg police said officers went to a home on Ventura Way on Tuesday to assist in a medical call. Emergency responders found the infant, who was unresponsive, police said.One neighbor said he talked to Durant on Tuesday night.

“He says, ‘my baby just passed away.’ I was like ‘for real?’ He was crying, holding his head down,” said that neighbor.

The child was taken to Presbyterian Hospital. Staff members there told police he showed signs of physical abuse, CMPD officials said.

At that point, detectives with the Homicide and Family Services Unit began an investigation, processing the home for evidence and interviewing the infant’s parents.

On Tuesday evening, hospital staff members notified police that the infant had died.

Police said the preliminary investigation and the findings of the medical examiner gave them enough evidence to obtain a murder warrant for Durant.

Neighbors said Durant also has a 6-year-old son and appeared to be an attentive father.

“Every time I saw him, he was either up at the bus stop, making sure his kids got off the bus or I seen him walking around with them strapped to his back,” said neighbor Randy King.

King was shocked he saw the police report alleging physical abuse.

“I wouldn’t say he seemed like a parent who was abusive, or had an uneven temperament or anything like that. He seemed like he was taking care of his kids,” said King.

Neighbors said they had seen police in the apartment for the last two days and thought a criminal charge would be coming.

Durant was arrested once before for assaulting a woman two years ago.

Child death disclosure hindered by Bureaucratic circumventing, ignorance? Part 3

Part 3: Bureaucratic circumventing; avoiding disclosure by statutory maneuvering?

Is mandatory disclosure, being avoided by Bureaucratic circumventing?

Is Child fatality disclosure hindered by Bureaucratic circumventing and ignorance?

Part 3 of a 4 part investigative report

Read Part 1, Read Part 2

Bureaucratic circumventing

Circumventing is defined as:

  1. Find a way around (an obstacle).
  2. Overcome (a difficulty), typically in a clever and surreptitious way.

According to ACF in their Policy Interpertation Questions and Answers section, the only legally allowed reason to refuse disclosure in child fatality and near fatality cases is if that disclosure would jeopardize a criminal investigation or proceeding.

Read more

In Memory of Connor and Cameron Maxwell

Connor Maxwell

Cameron Maxwell

William Maxwell Loved His Family Then He Killed Them, Say N.C. Police

November 3, 2009 1:12 PM

By Neil Katz

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-5510296-504083.html

FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. (CBS/AP) People who knew William Maxwell say that the 47-year-old real estate developer and active church member loved his family more than anything.

But police say that didn’t stop him from shooting to death his wife and two children then himself Monday night in a gruesome murder-suicide that has shaken an upscale Fayetteville, N.C. community, one hour south of Raleigh.

Authorities did not hint at a motive.

Police said Tuesday that Maxwell killed wife his wife, Kathryn, and their children, 17-year-old Connor and 15-year-old Cameron, before turning a gun on himself.

“Billy, if you knew him, loved his family. Everybody knew that. That’s what makes this so tragic,” said John Cook, pastor of Snyder Memorial Baptist Church, where every member of the family was active. “Obviously something tragic was going on for this to happen.”

Friends and neighbors say the Maxwells were a friendly family who kept a meticulous yard and were active in their church and their children’s religious high school.

“They were just wonderful people, active in their church,” said neighbor Kay Edwards, who has lived next door since 1994, when she moved back into the home where she grew up and where her 94-year-old mother still lives. “They were just good neighbors.”

Edwards said she would often see family members walking their small dog through the quiet, leafy neighborhood.

“We’re just all in shock,” she said Tuesday. “You could not image this happening.”

William Maxwell was a builder and land developer who built residential subdivisions in Cumberland and Harnett counties, said John McKinney of Fayetteville, who described himself as Maxwell’s business partner and friend for more than a decade.

“He was a devout Christian and I really loved his family,” McKinney said.

William Maxwell followed his father into the residential real estate business and also owned a couple of local car washes, while his wife Kathryn was a stay-at-home mother who taught Sunday school at Snyder Memorial, McKinney and Cook said.

Years ago, Kathryn, 43, taught in Fayetteville’s public schools, said neighbor and state Sen. Tony Rand, whose wife worked with her.

Connor Maxwell performed in a dance troupe and sang in the big Christmas celebration at the family’s church, which has about 1,800 members, Cook said.

She was a senior while brother Cameron attended 9th grade at Village Christian Academy in Fayetteville. The school is affiliated with Village Baptist Church. “We’re obviously very saddened by this tragic event and we’re really concentrating right now on just meeting the needs of the students and staff at the school,” said Lou Nelon, the church administrator. “Those kids were very well loved and respected. They were very well known here in town,” Nelon said.

In a neighborhood with well-manicured lawns where many houses sit on hill tops, a steady stream of cars drove by the house on Tuesday, slowing for drivers to gape at the crime scene.

Evelyn Diaz, a Maxwell neighbor for about a year, said she remembered the father and son working on the meticulously-kept lawn. One woman who said her husband coached basketball at Village Christian Academy with Maxwell came Tuesday to lay a bunch of yellow daisies on the lawn.

Suzie Martell, a neighbor and a student at Fayetteville Technical Community College, came by the house to snap some pictures with her cell phone. “The family was great. The husband obviously prospered in his field,” said Martell.

Fayetteville is about 50 miles southwest of Raleigh and home to the Army’s sprawling Fort Bragg.

In Memory of Makayla and Kaylob Dean Peek

Kaylob Dean Peek

When the autopsy said SIDS, investigation stopped

BY FRED CLASEN-KELLY - THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER

http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/06/08/520353/when-the-autopsy-said-sids-investigation.html

GASTONIA — The 911 caller described a terrifying scene: A man in a convenience store parking lot was choking an infant.

Moments earlier, the man hit the baby’s mother, the caller said. By one account, he had struck the woman in the face and the baby fell from her arms to the ground.

Now, the man held 1-month-old Makayla Peek in the air by her throat as bystanders begged him to stop, the caller said. After five to 10 seconds, he put her down and stormed off on foot.

Later that night, Makayla’s mother, who was sleeping with the child, awoke to find her dead.

Two years later, she lost another baby. She again was sleeping with her child, this time a son.

Today, no one has been charged in either case, an example of how even the mention of SIDS in an autopsy can complicate criminal investigations.

The cases were among several North Carolina infant deaths reviewed by the Observer in which law enforcement said the SIDS label discouraged them from seeking charges.

Crimes are difficult to prosecute when the possibility of SIDS is mentioned in an autopsy because it describes a natural death.

What happened to Makayla remains a mystery. Was she fatally injured in the parking lot? Did her mother, who witnesses said was drunk or high that day, unintentionally suffocate her as they slept? Or did something else kill Makayla, possibly SIDS?

Belmont police opened an investigation, suspecting homicide. When a baby is choked and then dies, “it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure it out,” Chief David James said.

An emergency room doctor told police Makayla suffered a skull fracture, likely from being shaken, dropped or a hit on the head.

But a Gaston County medical examiner ruled the cause of death undetermined. An autopsy report says the medical examiner did not find a skull fracture and wrote the death was “consistent with SIDS.”

Police questioned Makayla’s mother and her mother’s then-boyfriend, but, after 14 months, closed the case.

Gaston County District Attorney Locke Bell declined to file charges, saying the autopsy findings left him with no medical evidence.

The second baby, 2-week-old Kaylob Dean Peek, died March 5, 2009, after sleeping in bed with his mother.

A second unexpected infant death puts law enforcement authorities on the alert for reckless behavior or potential homicide.

Just like in Makayla’s case, authorities did not pursue charges after Kaylob’s cause of death was ruled undetermined but “consistent with SIDS.”

Drug history

Accounts show Makayla’s short life was surrounded by turmoil.

In the hours before Makayla died, Joanie Hopkins and her boyfriend, Jason Michael Wilson, appeared under the influence of drugs or alcohol, according to police reports and records from the Gaston County Department of Social Services.

One woman said Hopkins acted drugged and her eyes were rolling to the back of her head. Another person said Wilson drank and took pills that day.

The behavior did not shock people who knew them. Two weeks after Makayla was born, someone called DSS to report Hopkins and Wilson had used drugs in the baby’s presence.

About the same time, friends worried about the baby’s safety because Hopkins “would be so high Makayla would fall out of the car seat,” said Margaret Thompson, Hopkins’ mother.

DSS and court records say there were allegations of domestic violence between Hopkins and Wilson.

At least two other Gaston County women have sought protective orders against Wilson, according to court records. In August, one woman claimed that Wilson threatened her and her 1-year-old daughter. She said Wilson told her, “You deserve to have me kill you and your family.”

By the throat

About 9 p.m. on June 5, 2007, the couple rode to the Kingsway convenience store in Gastonia, with Makayla in the car, a police report says.

An argument ensued.

A woman inside the store heard the commotion and went outside to see what happened. She told police she saw a man hit a woman before a bystander pulled him away. She asked not to be identified in this story for safety reasons.

The woman said she went back inside the building, but she heard screams again. When she looked outside this time, she said she saw a man “holding a baby by its throat, its feet dangled in the air.”

Another person told police Wilson came to her home later that night and gave an account of what happened in the parking lot. She said Wilson told her that he hit Hopkins in the face and “she dropped the baby on the cement.”

911 call

Hopkins told police she drove Makayla from the store to her home, arriving about 10 p.m. She said she fed Makayla a bottle, burped her and went to sleep with the infant on her chest.

About 2:30 a.m., Wilson knocked on Hopkins’ door. When Hopkins came to the door with Makayla in her arms, both Wilson and Hopkins said they noticed Makayla wasn’t breathing. They called 911.

The operator instructed the couple to start cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but “all that seemed to be happening was Jason and Joanie arguing in the background,” a report said.

Hopkins told the 911 operator differing accounts of what happened, police said. At first, she said the baby fell off the bed. She later said she was sleeping with the baby on the couch and she must have rolled over on her.

Emergency responders arrived and attempted to revive Makayla, but one rescuer said she showed signs she had been dead for an extended period of time.

‘She died of SIDS’

Hopkins said she couldn’t remember exactly what happened the night Makayla died.

When a police officer arrived, she repeatedly said “I did not drop her again.” In a later police interview, she said she “knew that Jason killed her baby, she just doesn’t know how he did it.”

Hopkins, 30, declined comment for this story.

Wilson, 29, denies that he choked Makayla or hit Hopkins at the Kingsway store.

Wilson told police he was trying to leave her car when Hopkins began screaming and confronting him. Wilson said he pushed her away and left.

Contacted by the Observer, Wilson yelled and threatened a reporter. “She died of SIDS,” he said.

His father, Eddie Wilson, said his family has tried to move past the tragedy. Eddie Wilson said Jason Wilson was trying to help Makayla the night she died. “He was in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

Asked about the allegations his son was seen choking the infant, he said, “If that were true, wouldn’t he be charged?”

Case closed

The district attorney’s office would not pursue charges. Belmont police closed the case Oct. 30, 2008, more than a year after Makayla died.

James, the department’s chief, said the medical examiner’s findings derailed the investigation. He said he complained about the findings to Dr. John Butts, the state’s chief medical examiner.

Butts said he does not recall receiving the complaint.

James said he is upset because a Gaston Memorial Hospital emergency room doctor said preliminary X-rays showed Makayla had suffered a skull fracture.

A radiologist’s review said “there was a suggestion of a depressed skull fracture” and asked for more studies, but they were never done, the autopsy report says.

The autopsy performed by Dr. Peter Wittenberg in Gaston County found no skull fracture.

Wittenberg referred questions to Butts, who is responsible for overseeing medical examiners statewide.

In an interview with the Observer, Butts dismissed the possibility Makayla suffered a skull fracture, saying the hospital must have interpreted the X-rays wrong. He said he sees no reason to review the X-ray.

An autopsy is far more accurate than an X-ray, he said. “In an autopsy you hold the bone in your hands,” Butts said. “An X-ray, you are looking at shadows.”

Butts added that during an autopsy, “if there’s a fracture, you can’t miss it.”

He said the medical examiner wrote that Makayla’s death was “consistent with SIDS” because the autopsy revealed no explanation for the death. Butts said it was classified undetermined based on the circumstances surrounding the death.

The ruling means the autopsy did not find evidence linking the baby’s death to the alleged choking, Butts said.

“If you cannot connect the two, how can you get up in court and testify this child is [dead] because someone maltreated them a few hours before, but somehow didn’t produce any marks?” he asked. “Your position is indefensible.”

But Chris Hendricks, a Gaston EMS operations supervisor, sat on an expert panel that reviewed the case and issued a report detailing how police, doctors, DSS and others performed their roles.

“There are too many questions for it just to be a SIDS case,” Hendricks said.

The panel found that “all resources available to the local Medical Examiner were not thoroughly utilized.” They said “local law enforcement did not communicate all relevant scene/investigative findings to the local Medical Examiner.”

The report also said Hopkins had been warned about the danger of bed-sharing the infants, which has been identified as a risk for suffocation.

No prosecution

Bell, the Gaston County district attorney, said there is not enough evidence to convict anyone in Makayla’s death. He said he had anticipated the autopsy would show different results.

Bell said he considered filing lesser charges against Wilson, but decided he was not going to “put the mother through the suffering,” he said.

Thompson, Makayla’s grandmother, said she has tried to work with police but investigators tell her they share her frustration with Bell’s stance.

She said an officer from the Gaston County Police told her that he met with Bell and Gaston County DSS to present evidence that shows connections between the deaths of the two babies.

Few details are publicly available in the death of the second baby, Kaylob.

An autopsy said Hopkins fed him in the middle of the night. “The mother took the infant to bed with her. In the morning, mother found the infant cold and dead,” the report says.

Gaston County Police Sgt. Steve Dover said police found no indication of foul play, but the investigating officer “didn’t like the determination of SIDS. It bothered him that it was the second child” who died.

A report from the expert panel that reviews such cases is not yet available, a state spokeswoman said.

Bell said he reviewed the cases with police but authorities found no evidence of a link.

The medical examiner’s ruling influenced his decision not to pursue charges in both cases, Bell said. “The doctor says it’s consistent with SIDS, so we have no evidence to show it wasn’t SIDS,” he said. “You can’t prosecute on what you suspect.”

A grandmother’s grief

Thompson said she doesn’t believe her grandchildren died from natural causes. What sticks in her mind is the mention of SIDS in the autopsies.

“Two little babies dying with SIDS is almost impossible,” she said.

On a recent day, Thompson visited Evergreen cemetery in Belmont, where Makayla and Kaylob are buried in adjacent graves. Grass obscures the tiny 7-inch-wide grave markers bearing their names, dates of birth and dates of death.

Thompson said she wanted to purchase tombstones for her grandchildren but was told she would need consent from Hopkins. She said Hopkins rarely speaks to her.

The grandmother recounted the events surrounding Makayla’s death and one of her last conversations with her daughter. Tears streamed down her face as she recalled how Makayla seldom cried.

“I don’t want to sound redundant,” Thompson said, “but I am just amazed they didn’t file charges.”

In Memory of Austen Blake Minter II and Serenity Tyvon Minter

Police seek answers as family mourns mom, kids slain in murder-suicide

Monday, Jul 12 2010, 8:40 am

Destiny Minter may be the only one who knows why her mother’s boyfriend opened fire on his family before taking his own life.

Police say the 7-year-old who survived a gunshot to the face and is recovering in a Charlotte hospital is detectives’ best hope for understanding what led to Friday’s murder-suicide. Two adults and two children were found dead in a home at 1303 Dean Drive north of Dallas.

Capt. Joe Ramey of the Gaston County Police Department said investigators plan to interview the girl when her condition improves.

“We’re mostly concerned with her health and well-being, so we’ll heed the advice of doctors as to when would be an appropriate time,” Ramey said. “We may never know the exact reason for why this occurred, but we’ll try to get the best information available and put together as much information as we have.”

Austen Blake Minter, 25, shot and killed his girlfriend, Tracy Lee Hedgepath, 24, and two of their children, 6-year-old Austen Blake Minter II and 3-year-old Serenity Tyvon Minter, according to police. He also allegedly shot Destiny Minter, who was still alive when her grandparents got to the home to check on Hedgepath after she didn’t report to work.

“The young girl was able to come to the door,” Ramey said.

Destiny was in the home surrounded by her dead mother and siblings for several hours before her grandparents arrived, but may have been incapacitated or unconscious for part of the time, according to police.

Detectives say Hedgepath was about three months pregnant with her and Minter’s fourth child.

“There’s no rhyme or reason for an individual to commit these types of acts, shooting anyone, much less shooting children so young,” Ramey said.

Violent history

Police say Austen Minter had a history of domestic violence complaints. Arrest records show he was charged twice in 2008 with violating a domestic violence protective order and had also been charged with domestic criminal trespassing and assault on a female.

Ramey said Hedgepath had applied for a domestic violence protective order in 2008, but she had never completed the process to have the order enforced.

She and Minter were living together at the time of the fatal shooting, but had an on-again, off-again relationship, Ramey said. Minter had moved out of the Dean Drive home a few months ago, but had recently moved back in.

“There are always opportunities for individuals to try to get away from situations such as these,” Ramey said. “It boils down to people making the right choices and the perpetrator as well as the victims working out their differences or seeking out the help that is available. You can’t make people do these things. All you can do is offer.”

Hedgepath’s sisters said they feared Austen Minter and saw a recurring pattern of abuse.

“He was a horrible person — he always hit on her,” said sister Billie Verrier. “We feared for her life. We knew that one day, something was going to happen. He wouldn’t stay away from her.”

The 25-year-old had threatened to shoot his girlfriend before and had been in violent altercations with his own family members, according to Hedgepath’s family. Police confirmed that Austen Minter was shot during a gunfight with his stepfather, but weren’t immediately able to provide details of that incident.

“He was a monster, that’s all I’ve got to say about him,” said Kellie Harris, another of Hedgepath’s sisters. “He was abusive to his own family. He wasn’t a man, he was a monster.”

A hardworking mom

Relatives and neighbors said Tracy Hedgepath worked tirelessly to provide for her children and cherished the time she spent playing with them.

“She was a wonderful mother, and they were wonderful kids,” said Harris. “She worked every day of her life, and she raised those kids on her own.”

Hedgepath was the youngest of eight children and had six sisters and a brother. She graduated from North Gaston High School in 2003. Verrier said she worked at Kmart in Gastonia for nearly seven years.

“She worked every day for her babies,” Verrier said. “She was a very loving sister. She’d be there for you in a minute if you needed.”

Police say Destiny Minter is expected to survive her injuries, but doctors have yet to determine how much treatment she’ll need and what permanent damage she’ll suffer. Social workers will determine who will take care of the girl, Ramey said.

Verrier said she or her mother plan to take Destiny in. She said the girl’s grandparents and aunts will tell her about her mother’s kind and loving nature as she grows older.

“We’ll say that her mom was a wonderful person and that she loved her and so did her sister and brother,” Verrier said. “Her mother would want her to be strong. All we can do is comfort her and let her know that she’s loved — not just by us, but by her mom, too.”

Fatal shooting

Police say Austen Minter shot his girlfriend and their four children in the kitchen area of the tidy ranch home. Detectives found a .380-caliber handgun with five rounds fired, Ramey said Saturday. The police captain said he’d wait for autopsy reports before discussing where the four deceased had been shot.

Hedgepath’s parents made a 911 call after arriving at the Dean Drive house around 7:30 p.m. Friday. The young woman’s co-workers had called to notify her parents that she hadn’t come to work.

Ramey said police didn’t find a suicide note. Investigators were searching for those who had seen the family recently and may have been aware of any disputes.

“We don’t have any indication of what brought about the events of yesterday,” Ramey said. “That’s what we’re trying to get to the bottom of. We’re looking for people who might have a better insight into how their relationship was recently.”

Ramey said police would order toxicology tests to determine whether Austen Minter was under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Police were also reviewing Austen Minter’s criminal history and records of calls to service to the house.

“It’s a very tragic and unfortunate situation for both families involved and for the neighborhood,” Ramey said. “It’s just a difficult situation for everyone who’s involved.”

While sorrow and grief engulf the Hedgepath family, the slain woman’s sisters take comfort in knowing that she’s forever free from the painful cycle of domestic violence.

“She’s with God now — her and the babies both,” Verrier said. “They don’t have to suffer no more.”

Gazette Interactive Editor Kevin Ellis contributed to this story. You can reach Corey Friedman at 704-869-1828.

TROUBLED PAST

Austen Minter, who police say shot his girlfriend and their three children before turning the gun on himself Friday, has a history of domestic violence and gun charges. The 25-year-old has never been to prison, but had been given probation for a misdemeanor charge of assault by pointing a gun in August 2009, according to the N.C. Department of Correction.

Following are charges Minter has faced in Gaston County. A complete criminal record check was not available in time for this story.

April 23, 2007 — Domestic criminal trespassing and discharging a firearm into an occupied property. He posted the $25,000 bond.

March 22, 2008 — Violation of a domestic violence protection order and driving charges (invalid plates and driving without a license). Posted $1,000 unsecured and $500 secured bonds.

May 28, 2008 — Violation of a domestic violence protection order and failure to comply. Posted $25,200 bond and $200 for the failure to comply.

Dec. 4, 2008 — Resisting a public officer and assaulting a female. Posted $5,000 bond.

Feb. 11, 2009 — Assault with a deadly weapon, intent to kill, assault by pointing a gun, discharging a firearm within city limits. Original $50,000 bond was reduced to $15,000 on Feb. 18, then posted.

SOURCE: Gaston County Sheriff’s Office

Information compiled by Victoria Kurzweg/The Gazette

 Is Child fatality disclosure hindered by Bureaucratic circumventing and ignorance?

Part 2 of a 4 part investigative report

Read Part 1

Part 2: Is DSS failure to reply to disclosure requests, breaking the law?

Twenty-six county DSS offices were contacted seeking disclosure about child abuse, neglect and maltreatment fatalities from 2008 to present.

Overall, most counties replied quickly, although there were some issues.

Email addresses for each counties DSS director was obtained from the North Carolina Department of Social Services, Local County Directory, so it could be assumed that these email addresses were correct.

Yet, in two of these disclosure requests, it took 3 to 4 emails in order to obtain a response.

Read more

In Memory of Khisha Lachelle Freeman

Death penalty sought in child’s murder case

Published 8:00am Friday, February 19, 2010

WINDSOR, N.C.—The state will seek the death penalty against a local man who stands accused of murdering his 13-month-old-daughter.

The case against 26-year-old Jermaine O’Brien Freeman, formerly of Conway who later moved to Bertie County, has been declared “capital” — meaning state prosecutors have officially informed the court they will seek the death penalty.

Prior to that ruling, the Northampton County Grand Jury returned true bills of indictment against Freeman, who was charged with first degree murder on Dec. 23 for the Dec. 19 death of his daughter, Khisha Lachelle Freeman.

Following the Grand Jury’s ruling, local District Attorney Valerie M. Asbell conducted a Rule 24 hearing where she declared the case as capital and informed the court she would seek the death penalty.

When asked about the nature of a Rule 24 hearing, Asbell said that was one where the District Attorney informs the judge there are aggravating factors for which the death penalty could be sought in a particular case.

Resident Superior Court Judge Cy Grant agreed, ruling that the case could be tried as a death penalty case.

Tonza Ruffin is representing Freeman. No trial date has been scheduled.

Freeman became the leading suspect in the murder following an investigation by Conway Police Chief Billy Duke.

In an earlier interview by this newspaper, Duke said that at 1:20 a.m. on Sunday, Dec. 20 he was alerted by Northampton County Central Dispatch who advised him about the child who had been brought by her mother, Tenisha Boyd, at 10:30 p.m. on Saturday, Dec. 19 to Roanoke-Chowan Hospital in Ahoskie. Duke said the attending physician performed tests on the child in which the results had indicated foul play.

“When I got there the child had been pronounced dead,” he said.

Duke said with the assistance of the Northampton County Sheriff’s Office, he was able to interview both Boyd and Freeman.

The child’s body was transported to Pitt Memorial Hospital for an autopsy.

“Those preliminary results indicated the child had died of blunt force trauma (in the head area),” he said.

Duke said he conducted two more follow up interviews with the mother from which Freeman was developed as a suspect.

Duke said he was able to collect evidence which he transported to the State Bureau of Investigation lab in Raleigh.

After speaking with Asbell, Duke drew warrants for Freeman’s arrest.

Upon being served those warrants on Dec. 23, Freeman was behind bars at Bertie Martin Regional Jail on an outstanding warrant (failure to appear in court) with a bond of $5,000. He is now held without bond on the charges of murder and felony child abuse inflicting serious injury.

According to the North Carolina Department of Corrections Web site, Freeman has a list of convictions, including misdemeanor charges for common law forgery and common law uttering and resisting an officer. He was also convicted in Gates County with felony assault inflicting serious body injury in 2008. The Roanoke-Chowan News-Herald has been able to confirm that the Gates County case involved a minor child.

In Memory of Kali Bekia Martin

Mom mourns her daughter’s violent death

SUNDAY, MARCH 29, 2009 

(Updated Tuesday, April 14 – 8:14 am)
By AMANDA LEHMERT 
Staff Writer

TROY — Like a lot of little girls, Kali Martin carried her beloved baby doll “Bob” — short for Barbara — with her always.

When she carelessly left bald-headed Bob out in the rain and the doll was crushed by her uncle’s car, the little girl knew she hadn’t been a very good mama.

“She said, ‘Mama, I’m calling social services. I’m calling the police,’ ” Kali’s mother Shannon Martin recalled. “ ‘I left Bob out.’ ”

Four-year-old Kali’s life came to a violent end March 18, and police say it was at the hands of her caretakers, Tonya Dobson Williams and Williams’ fiance, Anthony Ravon Duncan.

Williams and Duncan have been charged with first-degree murder in connection with Kali’s death.

Her 30-year-old mother, imprisoned on drug charges, was helpless to prevent Kali’s death by blunt-force trauma.

Interviewed Saturday in a steamy room at the medium-security Southern Correctional Institution in Troy, Martin said Kali was an old soul. And Martin expressed anger toward the people she trusted to care for three of her children.

“Kali was in their care, and they are responsible for my child,” she said. “I want them to suffer the same way they made Kali suffer.”

Martin grew up in the mountains of Dobson and moved to Greensboro last year with three of her four children, Kali, Alasha, 7, and Zion, 2.

The family lived with her cousin Williams, Duncan and Duncan’s three children, Martin said.

Little Kali liked to mother her little brother Zion and had tastes beyond her years, Martin said.

“She loved babies. She loved home-cooked meals,” her mother said. “There was not a morning that baby did not say, ‘I want my breakfast and I want coffee.’”

When Martin went to prison last year for drug trafficking, she gave temporary custody of the three children to Williams.

Martin said she had known Williams her whole life. And she had seen Duncan take care of the children by playing with them and feeding them.

“I really trusted them,” she said.

Although Martin said she was aware of drug and alcohol use in the house, she said she could not say whether there was a history of violence or physical abuse.

But Martin said Saturday that police investigators told her that Kali had both old and recent bruises on her body when she died, and that a blunt-force trauma to the head killed her daughter.

Martin said she is eager to get out of prison and take back custody of her two youngest children — now in the care of social services — and her eldest child, who lives with her parents.

“I hope they’re not traumatized,” she said.

Martin said she is ready to be a better mother to them. “I’m just stronger and wiser than I’ve ever been,” she said. “God changed me.”

Prison officials took Martin to see her daughter one last time before the funeral.

“I tried to take her out of the casket. I tried to wake her up. She didn’t wake up,” she said. “I still don’t want her in that casket. But she’s gone.”

Is Child fatality disclosure hindered by Bureaucratic circumventing and ignorance?


Part 1 of a 4 part investigative report

 

Recently, this reporter, sent out numerous, §7B-2902, child fatality disclosure requests to various county DSS agencies across the state of North Carolina.

These disclosures come at a very high price, the fatality or near fatality of a child. 

As such, requests for disclosure should be handled with the utmost respect, honesty, and in full compliance with the law.

Read more

In Memory of Antonio Devon Bridges Jr.

Antonio Devon Bridges Jr.

Antonio Devon Bridges Jr.

Autopsy: blunt force trauma killed baby

By: From staff reports | GoDanRiver.com 
Published: October 17, 2008

http://www2.godanriver.com/news/2008/oct/17/autopsy_blunt_force_trauma_killed_baby-ar-274932/

An autopsy report confirms that the death of an 11-month-old baby was the result of blunt force trauma June 19 at a room in the Mar Gre Motel in Eden.

The infant, Antonio Devon Bridges Jr., had “blunt force injuries of the head and torso,” the N.C. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner said in its report, released Thursday. Bridges’ injuries included a skull fracture, rib fractures, liver laceration and bruises of the face, neck, chest, abdomen, back, buttocks and arms.

Eden police charged Luther Qwama Martin, 18, of 421 Moir St. in Eden, with the first-degree murder of Bridges. Martin’s attorney requested bail, which was denied.

“The state opposes bond, considering the injuries sustained by the child, a lacerated liver and a fractured skull, and that Martin was out on pretrial release at the time of the child’s death,” Chief Assistant District Attorney Julia Hejazi has said.

Martin could face the death penalty if convicted, according to an Aug. 4 ruling in Rockingham County Superior Court. The court agreed with Hejazi in seeking the death penalty. Martin’s next court date is Nov. 10.

Dispatchers for 911 received a call the morning of June 19 from the Mar Gre Motel, informing them of a child in need of medical attention. Officers found Bridges unresponsive and took the infant to Morehead Memorial Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

Nearly 12 hours later, Eden police officers arrested Martin.

Police said Martin had been staying in Room 144 at the Mar Gre Motel with his girlfriend, Jamica Woodard, Bridges’ mother. Court documents said Woodard stepped outside the motel room to smoke a cigarette and returned to find her infant son unresponsive.

The baby was the son of Antonio Devon Bridges Sr., who is serving nine to 12 years in Raleigh’s Central Prison. Bridges was arrested in January 2007 after he fired a handgun at two Eden officers after a chase through the Draper area. The officers returned fire. Bridges was hit and was rushed to Morehead, then to Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, where he spent several days in critical condition. Bridgesremains paralyzed from the waist down.

Martin had a criminal record beginning when he was a student at Morehead High School, according to court documents. He was arrested in February and in May on charges of communicating threats, the last instance prompting a $50,000 bail.

In Memory of Dakota Johnson

 

Three dead in murder-suicide

BY SARAH NAGEM AND THOMASI MCDONALD – Staff Writers

http://www.newsobserver.com/2010/07/14/580347/three-dead-in-murder-suicide.html#storylink=cpy

 CLAYTON — Devinee Maier House called sheriff’s deputies four times in the last 12 weeks for help dealing with a husband she was trying to leave before the couple and her teenage son were found dead Tuesday morning in their home near Clayton.

In the early-morning hours, the deteriorating marriage met a violent end. Investigators say William Fulton House, 50, shot his wife and his 15-year-old stepson, Dakota Johnson, before turning the gun on himself.

The couple’s three younger children – ages 2, 7 and 8 – were in the Castleberry Road home at the time of the shootings but were unharmed, said Tammy Amaon, spokeswoman for the Johnston County Sheriff’s Office. They are in the custody of their grandmother, but Amaon said she did not know where the woman lives.

It’s sad,” Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell said. “It just shows domestic [situations] can be deadly.

“Bizzell said deputies who respond to domestic calls often refer victims to a domestic-violence shelter or refer couples to counseling. But he did not know whether his deputies ever referred William and Devinee House to a counselor during the four calls they answered at the couple’s home.

Bizzell also said he did not know whether either had filed for a protective order against the other. Amaon said there were no signs of violence between husband and wife in the four visits deputies made to their home before Tuesday.

Domestic-violence advocates said they were not surprised that the marital discord escalated to violence if Devinee House, 42, had recently tried to leave her husband.

“This is very common. The time of separation can be the most dangerous for a victim,” said Beth Froehling, executive director of the North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence. “Most homicides occur during separation or attempted separation.

“Laura Hilton, director of community outreach and education with Interact, the Raleigh-based domestic violence center, said victims are 75 percent more at risk of being injured or killed when they try to leave the marital home.

Both Froehling and Hilton said law officers investigating a domestic violence case often carry cards that have contact information for domestic-violence agencies that provide victims with resources, safety and help filing a restraining order.

“It’s the most important piece of information to give the victim so that they will know that resources are available in the community,” Froehling said.

Call came at 7:54 a.m.

When the 911 call came in at 7:54 a.m. Tuesday, sheriff’s deputies were already familiar with the brick house at 640 Castleberry Road.

At 3:30 p.m. Saturday, Devinee House called 911 and said her husband barred her from taking the children from the home, Amaon said.When sheriff’s deputies arrived, they found that she and the children had already left. William House, known as “Billy,” told the deputies that everything was fine, Amaon said.

On June 17 at 4:30 p.m., Devinee House called 911 and told a dispatcher that her husband had changed the locks on the doors of the home.

On April 29, she called 911 to report that her husband was harassing her, Amaon said. When sheriff’s deputies arrived, William House agreed to leave for the evening, Amaon said.

And on April 20, just after 5 p.m., Devinee House called 911 and reported that her husband was causing problems, Amaon said.

William and Devinee House each agreed to find another place to stay for the evening, Amaon said.There was no indication that drugs or alcohol were involved in any of the incidents, Amaon said.

A neighbor said he overheard arguments between the couple. Danny Davis, 35, who lives next to the House home, said he began to hear William and Devinee House argue around Christmas. About a month ago, William House moved into an apartment he made in one of several out-buildings on the property, Davis said.

Davis said he heard gunshots early Tuesday morning, but he didn’t call 911 because he didn’t want to get involved.

“When I saw the yellow tape, I knew,” Davis said.”I didn’t know who, but I knew.

“Worked as inspector

Neighbors say William House, who worked for thecity of Raleigh’s inspections department, where he made sure heating and air conditioning units installed throughout the city met local and state codes, enjoyed carpentry and had built up his property over the years.

William House purchased the home in 1996, according to Johnston County property tax records. In the back of the brick house, he put up four out-buildings, and another was under construction. A chain-link fence surrounds the main house and the backyard, which contains an elaborate playground set. Another fence circles the whole property.

“He just loved to build stuff,” Davis said. “He built everything over there.

“Tuesday’s shooting was the second deadly domestic-violence case in Johnston County this month. Authorities say that Aldolfo Reyes Maldonado shot and killed his wife, Elizabeth Holmes Reyes, and injured her stepfather on July 1 in the Brogden community.

Maldonado was wounded by pellets from his own shotgun, authorities said.

Bizzell said he wishes William and Devinee House had separated so maybe their marriage wouldn’t have come to a deadly end. While law enforcement officials often offer resources, he said, the people involved have to act on that offer.

“We’ve got some personal responsibility, too,” Bizzell said.

On Friday, the North Carolina Court of Appeals granted a 10 day stay, that suspended the release of DSS disclosure records regarding their investigation of reported abuse on a child that later died.

4-year-old Cedric Francois died, October 19, 2011, just 19 days after social workers visited the home where he lived with his mother, Taquita Francois and her boyfriend, Michael Antonio Dixon Jr., according to court records.

Read more

In an interview with NBC 17 on Thursday, Johnston County Sheriff, Steve Bizzell spoke out about what he sees as the willful failure of the Johnston County DSS, on-call social workers, to respond to calls from the Sheriff’s department to help children in need.

According to Sheriff Bizzell, this “total disregard for public safety” has been occurring for over a year.

“As Sheriff, I’m going to do my job.  Enough’s enough, I’m sick of it, its disgusting and I’m not going to tolerate it anymore.”

“If the Johnston County Social Workers on call are not going to meet the needs of the Johnston County children, I’m going to be on the steps of the Governor’s mansion finding out who is going to be.”, stated Bizzell.

 

MORE

The following is a message that was left on my answering machine October 24, 2006.

Hal Wilson to Phyllis Fulton  <<<< Click this link to hear.  (left on my answering machine)

*I did remove the child’s name from this audio recording!

In it Oscar Howard “Hal” Wilson III,  a Social Worker Supervisor at the Wilkes County Department of Social Services called our home, believing that he was calling Phyllis Fulton in Raleigh. During his lengthy message to Ms. Fulton, which he left on our home answering machine, he released my name as the reporter, the child’s name, and basically admitted that it was improbable the child received all of these bruises from a haunted ‘hay ride, but…’ He also said that they were going to advise me to make another report. A report that I was later criticized for making.

The level of incompetence required to make this phone call and then leave this message is astounding..  

First, “Hal” had to dial the wrong number,  Phyllis Fulton’s area code is 919, mine is 336, a huge difference.  Mr Wilson should have realized he was dialing a local number,  since Wilkes County’s area code is also 336.

Next, my answering machine, at the time, clearly indicated that “you have reached the Nixon family“.  NOT Phyllis Fulton at the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

Third, Hal then proceeds to break the law.  He releases the child’s name, (which I removed from this copy of the recording) then the reporters name on MY ANSWERING MACHINE.  

Hal Wilson had no clue who he was talking to, no idea who would hear this message.

But as a social worker supervisor, he should have!

Finally, He admits, “We kind of surmised, after hearing the child had been out on a hayride, we thought well maybe she could  have gotten some bruising from that although its improbable but the child’s age was taken into consideration….”

The last time I checked, which hasn’t been long, the North Carolina General Statutes does not say that DSS and the Director are only required to investigate and accept reports, where the child is saying something “adverse” has happened to them.  

Nor does it say that DSS is allowed to listen to the concerns of the reporter and just ASSUME that the bruises or injuries happened in an accident.

…and that is not what he says here, he basically admits that it is improbable that she received the bruises on the “hay ride” but they chose not to investigate the report based on their own conclusions, without ever talking to the child or viewing the bruises! (it wasn’t a “hay ride” at all, but a haunted trail, that she was carried through by her daddy…and no injuries occurred there! DSS was informed of this at the time of the report!) 

Of course, Hal’s statement in this phone call does not say that they believe “the child received the bruises by accidental means, Hal’s statement in this phone call says, although we believe it is improbable that this child received the bruises during a “hayride”, we aren’t going to investigate this report. 

So they believed that this child received these bruises some other way, other than a hayride, possibly from abuse, but they were not going to investigate it because the child DID NOT state she was being abused!

…and while the child had not stated that anything adverse had happened to her, she had not stated that anything adverse HAD NOT happened to her either!

I did not question her about the bruises, because I did not want to take the chance that DSS would then say that I coached her, or put ideas into her head!

I did what I was told to do, if the child came to our home with unexplained bruises I was supposed to call Allison Baker, which I did, but she refused to come to our home and talk to the child and see the bruises…and instead told me to call the “on call worker”, who refused the report.

In the letter that I received explaining why the report was not accepted, the reasons given is, “the child is nine years old and is not stating that anything adverse has happened to her.”

Refusal does not fit the criteria required for the report to have been screened out and not investigated.

It further states “Allegations do not meet CPS criteria”

Yet according to Chapter VIII:Protective Services 1407 – STRUCTURED INTAKE  a report of abuse is supposed to be screened using the following tools, (I have placed only the ones that apply to this case here) : 

VI. MALTREATMENT SCREENING TOOL AND PROCEDURES

The purpose of the screening tools is to determine which reports meet the legal definitions of abuse, neglect and dependency and to aid in achieving consistency in regards to the screening of CPS reports.

Which cases: The screening tools are to be utilized with every CPS report received in order to determine whether the allegations meet the legal definitions of abuse, neglect and dependency. If the information received meets the legal definitions; a CPS assessment is required. This includes telephone calls and all other means of referral, and includes information on new families and families already known to the agency; whether or not a case is open to CPS Assessments/Investigations, CPS In-Home Services or Child Placement Services.
Who: Every staff member who has the responsibility for CPS intake.
Decision: Screening tools determine whether the report should be accepted for CPS assessment. This is a joint decision made with the CPS Intake social worker and the supervisor.
When: Screening tools are consulted immediately upon receipt of the report.
Appropriate Consultation: Please refer to the definitions page for each screening tool. The tools correspond with the abuse, neglect and dependency statutes. The corresponding screening tools for abuse reports include: physical injury, cruel/grossly inappropriate behavior modification, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and moral turpitude. The corresponding tools for neglect reports include: improper care, improper supervision, improper discipline, abandonment, improper medical/remedial care, injurious environment, and illegal placement/adoption. The directions provide case examples but are not all-inclusive. It is impossible to account for all incidences of child abuse, neglect and dependency. These tools are guidelines to assist in the decision making process. The social worker should consult each tool as it corresponds to the allegations. Every allegation made by the reporter requires an examination of the corresponding screening tool. It is likely that a reporter will allege maltreatment which requires an examination of multiple screening tools. It is crucial to evaluate each allegation based on the statutory definitions of abuse, neglect and dependency, and consulting the Maltreatment Screening Tools serves this purpose.

A. Physical Injury Screening Tool Directions

Is the parent/caretaker causing serious non-accidental physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, disfigurement, or impairment?

Fractures, subdural hematoma, dislocations, sprains, internal injuries, burns and inflicted injuries such as extensive welts, bruises, lacerations and abrasions would be indicative of abuse. The specific injuries listed are not intended to be an all-inclusive list, but are an indication of information that does warrant an Investigative Assessment. There may be instances where a child has bruises that do not rise to the level of abuse, but are considered improper discipline (refer to Improper Discipline Maltreatment Screening Tool), as well as situations where there may be bruising and there is no abuse or neglect. Physical abuse of a preschool aged child or a developmentally disabled child requires an immediate response.

The physically injury screening tool for use in assessing a report of physical abuse.

I. Improper Discipline Screening Tool Directions

Is the parent/caretaker using corporal punishment that results in any type of injury, cuts or extreme bruises?

...significant trauma and tissue damage, such as bruises, welts, or lacerations may be signs of child neglect (inappropriate discipline) or child abuse, depending on the extent of the injuries. Factors to consider regarding bruising include: location and severity of the injury, child’s age and developmental stage, and whether the bruises are consistent with normal play. Injuries such as these, not resulting from an accident, must be assessed. A definition of significant trauma is any injury beyond temporary redness of the skin. A practical guideline to use is that any inflicted injury which lasts more than 24 hours constitutes significant injury and requires an investigation. (PEDIATRICS, Vol. 110 No. 3, September 2002, American Academy of Pediatrics.) A reporter’s knowledge that this was the parent’s first time inflicting such an injury or that the injury is just a small bruise does not impact screening. Spanking and corporal punishment should be confined to the buttocks or legs and should not result in injury, scarring or bruising. Physical discipline that is administered to a child’s head or torso area presents a greater risk of injury. The child’s age and abilities are relevant to whether the discipline used is reasonable…”

Improper discipline screening tool for use in assessing abuse/neglect

If the appropriate response is in doubt, the social worker should respond in the most protective way.

Yet even though, Hal Wilson, thought it was improbable that the bruises occurred during a hayride, and knowing that this child had a hand shaped BRUISE on her inner thigh, and bruises on her stomach (a very dangerous area to hit) as well as other bruises…he chose to screen out this report of abuse because the child did not say she was being abused!

This is not how you investigate reports of child abuse, this is how children end up dead!

A look at the law…

§ 7B‑302.  Assessment by director; access to confidential information; notification of person making the report.

(a)        When a report of abuse, neglect, or dependency is received, the director of the department of social services shall make a prompt and thorough assessment, using either a family assessment response or an investigative assessment response, in order to ascertain the facts of the case, the extent of the abuse or neglect, and the risk of harm to the juvenile, in order to determine whether protective services should be provided or the complaint filed as a petition. When the report alleges abuse, the director shall immediately, but no later than 24 hours after receipt of the report, initiate the assessment. When the report alleges neglect or dependency, the director shall initiate the assessment within 72 hours following receipt of the report. When the report alleges abandonment, the director shall immediately initiate an assessment, take appropriate steps to assume temporary custody of the juvenile, and take appropriate steps to secure an order for nonsecure custody of the juvenile. The assessment and evaluation shall include a visit to the place where the juvenile resides, except when the report alleges abuse or neglect in a child care facility as defined in Article 7 of Chapter 110 of the General Statutes. When a report alleges abuse or neglect in a child care facility as defined in Article 7 of Chapter 110 of the General Statutes, a visit to the place where the juvenile resides is not required. When the report alleges abandonment, the assessment shall include a request from the director to law enforcement officials to investigate through the North Carolina Center for Missing Persons and other national and State resources whether the juvenile is a missing child.

(a1)      All information received by the department of social services, including the identity of the reporter, shall be held in strictest confidence by the department, except that:…”

No where in the law does it state that the department of social services is to listen to the report and then JUMP to conclusions about how the bruises occurred!

Nor does the law state that the only reports that will be accepted and investigated are those where the child is saying that someone abused them.

Furthermore, there is no age limitations for investigating a report of abuse, meaning the age of the child does not matter, they are supposed to investigate reports of abuse of any child under the age of 18, who is not married, emancipated, or a member of the armed forces.

 If DSS receives a report of abuse saying that suspected abuse is happening to a nine year old, whether that nine year old is saying it is or not, they are required by law to investigate that report.

Unexplained bruises, some of which look like a hand print fit the criteria of suspected abuse and should be accepted for CPS investigation.

That is not what happened here.

And because that did not happen here, because of the obvious incompetence of this supervisor and the Wilkes County Department of Social Services, this child was left in the care of her mother, and the abuse was allowed to continue, while DSS turned their focus to shutting us up with a malicious, unethical, and illegal investigation!

The failure of the Wilkes County Department of Social Services to protect the child in this case, especially in light of their belief that it was improbable that the bruises occurred by accidental means, constitutes willful failure to follow the laws of North Carolina and America, as well as willful failure to protect a child from abuse.

I believe that breaking the law is a criminal offense, so why haven’t these people been charged with the crimes they committed?

Winson-Salem foster mother, Jasmine Smith Boyd, 38, of 3900 Thornaby Circle, has been arrested and charged with 6 counts of Sex Offense-Parental Role, a class E Felony.

Arrested for Multiple Sex offenses

Continue reading on Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/cps-in-winstonsalem/winston-salem-foster-mom-arrested-for-allegedly-having-sex-with-child#ixzz1fbVvCluh

There may be financial help available, in North Carolina, to relatives who have opened their home and hearts to children of family members that have been removed by CPS.

If DSS has placed a child into your home, in a Kinship placement or if you have been made a legal guardian or given legal custody of a child, you may be able to apply for, and receive financial assistance through Work First.

Most applicants that qualify for Work First Family Assistance also qualify for Medicaid, this includes you, and any other eligible family members. You may also qualify to receive help with child care expenses.
 

Continue reading on Examiner.com “Child only” Work First benefits may help support child in Kinship care – Winston-Salem CPS | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/cps-in-winstonsalem/child-only-work-first-payment-may-help-support-child-kinship-care#ixzz1fapKICSU

Many of you will remember the horrific case of Danieal Kelly, who was starved to death by her mother under the neglectful and blind eye of Philadelphia Social Workers, who after her death, had a document forging party.

Danieal Kelly in happier times

On October 20,  2011,  Danieal’s father, Daniel Kelly, Social Service Agency Manager, Mikal Kamuvaka, and Department of Human Services Social Worker,  Dana Poindexter, were sentenced to two and a half to five  years in prison.

Mikal Kamuvaka is also serving 17  and a 1/2 years in Federal Prison for the health care fraud she committed in Danieal’s case.

It took the Jury seven hours to return a guilty verdict on all charges,

      • Daniel Kelly Sr., 40, endangering the welfare of a child.
      • Dana Poindexter, 54, child endangerment, recklessly endangering another person, and perjury.
      • Mikal Kamuvaka, 62, involuntary manslaughter, child endangerment, reckless endangerment, perjury, criminal conspiracy, and four charges involving what prosecutors called a “forgery fest” to create a case file to fool investigators into thinking Kelly actually got in-home services.

Kelly, Poindexter, Kamuvaka found guilty in the death of Danieal Kelly

Many friends and family testified for the social worker who was sentenced — noting his kindness and good character. No one testified for the deceased girl.

The prosecution pointed out that, as in life, no adults were there to speak up on behalf of Danieal.

 Two and a half to 5 years in prison does not seem long enough after what Danieal suffered through!  Life in prison would have been better, but still not enough.  Danieal Kelly suffered years of abuse and neglect, it seems only fair that the people responsible for her death should receive a punishment equal to what she went through.

“Police and paramedics were called to Danieal’s West Philadelphia home and when they opened her bedroom door, the stench of decay hit them. Danieal, who had been dead for several hours, was on a dirty mattress surrounded by feces. Maggot-infested bedsores covered her back. She had been on the mattress for such a long time, the shape of her body was imprinted into the mattress. A grand jury report was released this week, indicting nine people and describing Danieal’s life of pain, neglect, abuse and eventual death.”

Danieal Kelly Autopsy Photo

Danieal had only been dead a few hours, but her autopsy photo shows the extent of the abuse she suffered.  And absolutely heartbreaking is the barrettes in her hair, her brother loved her, he did his best to take care of her, he fixed Danieal’s hair and he begged her mom to call 911.  If only the adults in this case has shown a quarter of the care and concern that he did, Danieal would probably still be alive.

While Danieal was starving to death, Dana Poindexter, the social worker assigned to investigate the reports of abuse and neglect concerning Danieal, was stuffing his face and throwing the empty food wrappers on top of the box, where Danieal’s case file lay buried at the bottom.

During this investigation, we found a tall, filthy cardboard box in Poindexter’s cubicle, big enough to hold a file cabinet. The box was filled to the top with random case files, food wrappers, and unopened business envelopes (some with four-year-old postmarks). At the bottom of the pile was Danieal’s file. -Grand Jury Report

MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc. Company co-founders Mickal Kamuvaka, 60, and Solomon Manamela, 52, and former caseworkers Julius Juma Murray, 52, and Miriam Coulebaly, 41, were all convicted of conspiracy, lying to federal agents and multiple counts of health care fraud and wire fraud.

Andrea Kelly plead guilty to third degree murder and was sentenced to 20 to 40 years

Daniel's mother, Andrea Kelly Plead guilty to 3rd degree murder and was sentenced to 20-40 years in prison.

Mother to enter plea in death of girl, 14

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20090428_The_mother_of_a_14-year-old_girl_who_starved_to_death_NO_HEAD_SPECIFIED.html

By Joseph Tanfani

INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

The mother of a 14-year-old girl who starved to death while under city supervision will “accept responsibility” for the crime and plead guilty to third-degree murder charges, her attorney said yesterday.

Andrea Kelly, 39, will agree to serve 20 to 40 years in prison for the 2006 death of her daughter, Danieal, said lawyer Richard Quinton Hark.

The girl, who suffered from cerebral palsy, weighed just 46 pounds when she died in a sweltering apartment. Her legs looked liked bare bone and her back was full of gaping bedsores infested with maggots.

Danieal’s death and other failures by Philadelphia’s Department of Human Services resulted in nine indictments, the firing of the agency’s two top officials and a number of reforms at the agency.

Hark said Kelly was acknowledging her failures as a parent.

“It’s a very difficult time when you have to accept responsibility for starving your daughter to death,” Hark said.

The girl’s slow death happened while the family, which included 10 children, was under the supervision of DHS. Prosecutors say the DHS caseworkers failed to do their jobs, which was to protect the child from neglect.

The agency had hired a private social services agency, Multi-Ethnic Behavioral Health, to visit the home and make sure the Kelly children were being cared for.

Charges of involuntary manslaughter are still pending against a caseworker from Multi-Ethnic, Julius Juma Murray, 51. He failed to make the required home visits and the agency falsified records to cover it up, according to the indictment issued last summer.

Murray’s lawyer, William Spade, said his client did his job and Andrea Kelly is right to accept the primary responsibility for Danieal’s death.

“He did what he was supposed to do,” Spade said of Murray. “He made the visits he was supposed to make. He tried to get the girl services, and he wasn’t successful because of the inaction of the parents.”

Officials from DHS and the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office did not respond to requests for comment yesterday evening.

Danieal Kelly’s father, Daniel Kelly, has been charged with endangering the welfare of children. Also charged in the case were Multi-Ethnic’s founder and two former DHS case workers.

Hark said Andrea Kelly’s plea agreement does not address whether she will cooperate in any of the other cases.

If she had gone to trial, Hark said, Kelly might have been convicted of first-degree murder and sent to prison for life. He said any jury would have been moved by the details of the girl’s death, and the pictures of Danieal’s body.

“If you have complex issues of an extremely malnourished mentally and medically disabled child in a mother’s care, it will really affect the jury,” he said.

The plea hearing is set for 1:30 p.m. before Common Pleas Court Judge Benjamin Lerner.

Along with the murder plea, Kelly is also pleading guilty to child endangerment.

“It’s the appropriate thing to do to bring closure to a very unfortunate circumstance in her life, and her family’s life,” Hark said.

Mother Pleads Guilty in Disabled Daughter’s Starvation Death

Published April 29, 2009

Associated Press

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,518416,00.html

A mother of 10 pleaded guilty Wednesday in the starvation death of her disabled daughter, but her lawyer said social workers and city officials share the blame.

 Andrea Kelly, 39, was immediately sentenced to 20 to 40 years in prison after pleading to third-degree murder.

 A grand jury investigation of the 2006 death of Danieal Kelly, who was 14 years old and weighed just 42 pounds, ignited fury in the city and prompted last year’s ouster of two top city welfare officials. Nine people were criminally charged, including the girl’s parents and four social workers.

 ”If anybody at DHS (the Department of Human Services) actually showed up, the child would have been removed from the home eight to nine months earlier,” defense lawyer Richard Q. Hark said after the hearing. “She would have lived.”

 Danieal — once a chubby-cheeked child who beamed in photographs taken on school trips — had deteriorated in the years since her father split with a stepmother in Arizona and she returned to her mother’s care in Philadelphia. She lost more than half her body weight and never left the dark, squalid house for school or even fresh air.

 Danieal suffered from cerebral palsy and could not walk. In her last days alive, during an August heat wave, the bedridden girl had flies and maggots hovering near her open sores and could muster only enough energy to ask a brother for “water.” He begged their mother to call an ambulance but was rebuffed, according to the grand jury report.

 ”I do accept my part in my daughter’s death. I wish I could have done more than I did to save her,” Andrea Kelly told a judge Wednesday, as an older son listened from the back row, the lone child in attendance. The minor-age children have been in foster care since Danieal’s death.

 Prosecutors will now focus on the remaining defendants, including social worker Julius Murray, who is charged with involuntary manslaughter, a misdemeanor. Murray worked for MultiEthnic Behavioral Health, a city contractor paid to help DHS provide services to needy families.

 The grand jury charged that Murray rarely if ever made the required twice-a-week visits and that he and a company owner forged reports to cover up their inaction.

 ”Though it was her mother who actually killed her, there are many layers of blame for what happened to Danieal Kelly: from parents, to caseworkers, to supervisors, to administrators,” states the 258-page grand jury report, issued last year.

 Murray insists he made the visits, said his lawyer, Will Spade.

 Assistant District Attorney Ed McCann called such an assertion “ludicrous.”

 ”This child’s decline cold not have been missed by anyone,” McCann said Wednesday. “If anyone would have been in that house in the months prior to her death, they would have seen a child starving to death.”

 The father, Daniel Kelly of Darby, Pa., is charged with child endangerment for allegedly deserting his daughter after they moved back to Philadelphia.

 Meanwhile, the parents have a civil suit pending against the city on behalf of Danieal’s estate, a suit the mayor and district attorney once deemed “obscene.” Lawyers involved say the likely beneficiaries are Danieal’s siblings, especially if both parents are convicted.

Also sentenced in this case:

Julius Juma Murray, 54, employee of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., pleaded guilty in February to involuntary manslaughter, conspiracy, and child endangerment, sentenced to four to eight years in prison. He is also serving an 11-year federal prison term for his conviction on health-care fraud and conspiracy. Murray, is in federal custody and faces deportation after he completes his sentence.

Laura Sommerer, 36, DHS caseworker, pleaded guilty in 2009 to child endangerment and was sentenced to four years' probation.

NO PICTURE AVAILABLE: Marie Moses, 37, a friend of Andrea Kelly, pleaded guilty in 2009 to perjury and was sentenced to three years’ probation.

Andrea Miles, Daughter of Marie Moses and a friend of Andrea Kelly, pleaded guilty in Juvenile Court in 2008 to perjury and was sentenced to probation.

NO PICTURE AVAILABLE: Diamond Brantley, 25, a friend of Andrea Kelly, pleaded guilty in 2009 to perjury and was sentenced to two years’ probation.

Solomon Manamela, 53, MultiEthnic cofounder. Convicted and sentenced to 14 years in prison.

Earle McNeill, 72, pled guilty to fraud charges and was sentenced to 90 months in prison. His sentence was increased about 12 months above prosecutors' recommendations after U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell determined that McNeill had not truthfully reported his Multiethnic income to a federal probation officer.

McNeill has a website where he is asking for help to appeal his sentence.  Danieal can’t appeal her death sentence at the hands of her mother,  Multiethnic, and DHS hands.

NO PICTURE AVAILABLE: Mariam Coulibaly 41, Case worker, was sentenced to 135 months (11 years). Although she  had no role in Danieal’s death she did help forge documents, lie to the FBI and hide $50,000 after the verdict to shield it from the court-ordered restitution.

NO PICTURE AVAILABLE: Christina Nimpson  66, Plead guilty and was sentenced to 20 months for one count of wire fraud, one count of healthcare fraud, and conspiracy.

NO PICTURE AVAILABLE: Manuelita Buenaflor  54, Plead guilty and was sentenced to 36 months in prison for one count of wire fraud, one count of healthcare fraud, and conspiracy

NO PICTURE AVAILABLE: Sotheary Chan 41, Plead guilty and was sentenced to 15 months for one count of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy

Sotheary Chan is now a physician’s assistant in Fairfax, S.C.,

NO PICTURE AVAILABLE: Patricia Burch, plead guilty to one count of perjury and was sentence to 24 months

Department of Justice release: SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY WORKERS SENTENCED FOR DEADLY FRAUD SCHEME

The total failure of CPS and MultiEthnic Behavioral Services is documented in the Grand Jury Report, below.

Grand Jury Report

Danieal Kelly at the Madison Rose Lane School in Phoenix, Arizona

FIRED

Cheryl Ransom-Garner, DHS Commissioner–The grand-jury report found that the management failures began years ago, before Danieal Kelly even arrived in Philadelphia. DHS workers complained that MultiEthnic was not visiting families as required and was falsifying records to cover it up. An investigator for DHS found that the fraud charges were likely true. But the agency wasn’t fired. Cheryl Ransom-Garner, who later became DHS director, summoned Mickal Kamuvaka and the other directors of the agency and “read them the riot act,” the report said.

Later, a DHS evaluation lauded MultiEthnic for its “energetic” performance, calling it “remarkable.” When called before the grand jury, Ransom-Garner said she didn’t remember hearing any complaints about the agency – a response the grand jury called “incredible.”

RESIGNED

Carmen Paris, Acting Health Commissioner–She ordered the coroner not to release the autopsy results.  The grand jury report accused her of interfering with the investigation. The Grand Jury heard testimony that Ms. Paris improperly interfered at least twice in the investigation of Danieal’s death. In her own testimony before the grand Jury, Ms. Paris was not entirely truthful when asked about her involvement with the investigation

Suspended

Mayor Nutter said of Danieal, “As a city government, we have failed you. I am fully, thoroughly, and completely pissed off about what has happened here. The behaviors exhibited by public employees is unacceptable, and I am furious by their actions.” You have not died in vain.

“I am fully, thoroughly, and completely pissed off about what has happened here. Behaviors exhibited by public employees is unacceptable and I am furious at their actions. When I think of my own daughter, and if she were in someone else’s care, and they performed the way some of these individuals did, I would kick their ass myself,” Mayor Michael Nutter said during a Monday morning news conference.”

The Mayor of Philadelphia, Michael Nutter, then suspended the following as a direct result of Danieal’s death:

Wesley Brown Social Service Program director, “Brown – who has been with DHS since 1975 and made $93,178 as a director in the Children and Youth Division -was suspended without pay for 10 days.”

Pamela Mayo Children and Youth Division operations director . “Mayo – who made $103,799 as DHS’ director of operations, Children and Youth Division – was suspended for two days without pay. 

“Mayo testified that she didn’t even question DHS worker Laura Sommerer or her immediate supervisors after learning that Danieal had not seen a doctor during the 10 months that Sommerer managed the case. And Brown actually defendedSommerer’s performance, insisting that she had met the ‘minimum expectations for case management,’ according to the grand-jury report.”
 
In this case, the “minimum” would seem to have fallen below even Spanish Inquisitor Torquemada’s standards.
 
This inspite of a grand jury statement that said, “…actions or inactions of these supervisors might arguably be considered criminal.” [However] the grand jury decided not to pursue criminal charges against the supervisors, even though, the report concluded, “a share of the stain of responsibility for Danieal’s death remains on their hands.” From Ethicsstupid

Janice Walker, the immediate supervisor of Dana Poindexter until she was promoted in July 2006.–Fully aware of Poindexter’s dereliction, Ms. Walker never insisted that he do his job. She falsely found reports of abuse against Danieal, unsubstantiated. “And it is equally clear that Ms. Walker neither insisted that he perform this work nor took action when the paperwork never materialized. This failure is appalling at many levels, not least because Ms. Walker’s job was to supervise five employees to make sure that they completed their investigations. If she did not do this, what on earth was she being paid for?” Grand Jury Report  

Martha Poller, supervisor of Janice Walker.–Admitted she falsified case records to make it seem that DHS had investigated old neglect reports involving the Kelly family and found them “unsubstantiated.” Called to testify, she told grand jurors that was common practice at DHS; she said it was a bureaucratic procedure that helped hasten services to families. That supervisor, Martha Poller, was given a new job: project manager for a team that will examine child-fatality cases. During a news conference, District Attorney Lynne M. Abraham said she was incredulous that Poller had been entrusted with that new duty.

Valerie Mond, an administrator.–defended Sommerer’s failure to complete the Family Service Plan as required in June 2006. (Ms. Mond no longer supervises Laura Sommerer, but did at the time of her testimony.) Ms. Mond insisted that the plan was completed in June, even though Sommerer had not turned it in to her supervisor and, as it turned out, had not even prepared it until after Danieal died. Ms. Mond seemed satisfied because Sommerer had met with the Kelly family before the month of June had expired. Never mind that the SCOH worker, whom Sommerer had still not met, was not at that meeting to review, among other things, SCOH’s progress in meeting the goals set forth in the plan.

Ms. Mond signed a performance evaluation for Sommerer on August 1, 2006 – three days before Danieal died – that gave the social worker an overall rating of “outstanding.” The rating was based in part on her “excellent case management skills” as evidenced by a “100% visitation and family service plan completion.” Sommerer won this 100% visitation score despite the fact that her visit to check on Danieal, while technically meeting the once-every-three-month requirement, failed to reveal that the girl was being starved to death.  Grand Jury Report

Ingrid Hawk, who assigned the Danieal Kelly case to Laura Sommerer.–Ms. Hawk did not recall ever discussing with Sommerer or Ms. Mond what services might be available or appropriate for Danieal. The supervisor never inquired about the severity of Danieal’s disability. She failed to ask why no progress was being made on the case. Although Ms. Hawk told the Grand Jury that she discussed the case with Sommerer and kept progress notes from those conferences, as is mandated by DHS policy, no records were found to support her claim. The summary of the case that Ms. Hawk left behind for her successor captures just how little she knew or cared about the case. It stated: “Washington #224062 – SCOH – 9 children. The family became known to DHS due to issues of poor supervision.” Grand Jury Report 

Shawn Davis, a supervisor of Laura Sommerer.–Had Mr. Davis adequately performed the responsibilities of his job, he would have known that the Kelly review was due, and insisted that Sommerer submit it. He would have learned of MultiEthnic’s utter failure to provide services, or even to file quarterly reports. Grand Jury Report

Danieal during happier times

A Timeline of Neglect

August 01, 2008

Jan. 3, 1992: Danieal Kelly is born in Youngstown, Ohio, the daughter of Andrea and Daniel Kelly. Danieal, who has cerebral palsy, is the third of 10 children born to Andrea Kelly by five fathers.

1994: Daniel and Andrea Kelly separate. Andrea Kelly moves with her children to Philadelphia.

1995: Daniel Kelly takes Danieal and a son, Daniel, to Pittsburgh after he hears their mother is not taking care of them. In an interview, the father says the two children had rotting teeth and had not been to a doctor in years. He and the children later move to Arizona.

1997: In Philadelphia, the Department of Human Services opens its first investigation into the Andrea Kelly family. A report says Danieal’s 3-year-old brother had bug-infested clothes and decaying teeth. DHS sustains the neglect finding and selects a private agency, Pathways of Pa., to help the family. It provides assistance until March 1999.

1999: DHS opens its second investigation of neglect involving the Kelly children but finds allegations unsubstantiated.

2000: Arizona authorities charge Daniel Kelly with violating a protective order. At some point, authorities there also substantiate a child-abuse complaint. He says he spanked his son in public, but did not abuse him.

December 2002: DHS receives its first complaints about MultiEthnic Behavioral Health, the private agency that would later be hired to check on Danieal Kelly: Company workers were not making home visits as required, and were falsifying records, according to the grand-jury report. DHS takes no action.

Summer 2003: Danieal moves back to Philadelphia with her father and brother.

Aug. 21, 2003: DHS receives its first call claiming neglect that involves Danieal. DHS has the case open for two years, and finally closes it as unsubstantiated.

2004: Daniel and Danieal rejoin their mother as their parents briefly reunite.

May 12, 2004: DHS opens a new investigation into the family. This inquiry looks into an allegation that Andrea is not providing proper medical care for Danieal. DHS closes the case, with the complaint deemed unsubstantiated.

June 20, 2004 to Sept. 13, 2005: DHS receives three more complaints that the mother does not properly care for Danieal.

 October 2005: DHS begins the seventh investigation into a complaint alleging “lack of supervision, poor home conditions.” It hires MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc. to check on the children’s medical treatment, monitor the children’s school attendance, solve “housing issues,” and address Danieal’s medical needs.

April 2006: Philadelphia school officials realize that Danieal needs to be enrolled in school. The enrollment process is still incomplete at the time of Danieal’s death.

June 29, 2006: A DHS worker briefly visits the Kelly home – failing to even enter Danieal’s bedroom, the grand-jury report says.

 Aug. 3, 2006: One of Danieal’s siblings asks Andrea Kelly to call police or an ambulance for Danieal. She refuses, the grand-jury report says.Aug. 4, 2006: An ambulance is called only after it is clear that Danieal is dead. Her emaciated body is found with maggots crawling in bedsores, which went to the bone. Paramedics say the house is strewn with trash and “unfit for human habitation.” Danieal’s seven remaining brothers and sisters are removed from Andrea Kelly’s custody.Aug. 4 2006: MultiEthnic officials allegedly begin falsifying documents to hide the agency’s negligence, the grand-jury report says.

Oct. 6, 2006: In the aftermath of Danieal Kelly’s death, DHS terminates its contract with MultiEthnic.

Oct. 10, 2006: Christian Kelly, the 10th child of Andrea Kelly, is born. DHS takes custody in the hospital.

Oct: 19, 2006: After The Inquirer reports on the deaths of other children while under DHS care, Mayor John F. Street is shown photographs of Danieal Kelly. He fires DHS Commissioner Cheryl Ransom-Garner and her top deputy.

November 2006: Danieal’s death is ruled a homicide.

May 31, 2007: A child-welfare panel calls for sweeping reforms in DHS policies and procedures, including the supervision of private contractors such as MultiEthnic.

July 31, 2008: Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne M. Abraham announces indictments of nine people, including Andrea and Daniel Kelly, and workers for MultiEthnic and DHS. Abraham also calls for the state to take over DHS.

SOURCES: Grand-jury report issued yesterday and previous DHS reports.

NEWS ARTICLES 

Danieal Kelly’s father, social workers get jail terms in her death

http://www.newsworks.org/index.php/local/item/28636-danieal-kellys-father-social-workers-get-jail-terms-in-her-death

October 20, 2011

By Elizabeth Fiedler
Thursday marked the final chapter in a gruesome case of child abuse that rocked Philadelphia after Danieal Kelly was found dead. A slew of adults blamed for the death of the disabled 14-year-old have already been sentenced, including her mother. Now, a judge has sentenced the girl’s father, Daniel Kelly, and two social workers to two and a half to five years in prison.

Danieal was covered in bed sores when she died of starvation in 2006. She weighed just 42 pounds.

Prosecutors pinned the blame on her parents and the social workers responsible for her care.

Lawyer Josh Scarpello represented social service agency manager Mikal Kamuvaka.

“It’s a horrible case where a lot of people failed Danieal and it was tough to find sympathy for any of the people involved so I can understand both the jury’s verdict and his reasoning in giving that sentence that he did,” Scarpello said.

Many friends and family testified for the social worker who was sentenced — noting his kindness and good character. No one testified for the deceased girl.

The prosecution pointed out that, as in life, no adults were there to speak up on behalf of Danieal.

“We actually looked back in the courtroom at the very beginning and saw all of these people in the courtroom and just thought to ourselves usually in a homicide case when we do sentencing we have family there,” said acting First Assistant District Attorney Edward McCann. “She didn’t have a family that cared for her, so we were her voice. And that was troubling obviously, that so many people let her down.”

The case highlighted widespread problems in the city’s Department of Human Services and led to major reforms.

Prison for three in Danieal Kelly’s death

July 16, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, Inquirer Staff Writer

Danieal Kelly’s father was not there when she starved to death almost five years ago in her mother’s squalid West Philadelphia apartment.

Neither was Dana Poindexter, the city Department of Human Services social worker who supposedly investigated reports that she was being neglected. Nor Mickal Kamuvaka, head of a DHS contractor paid to put a social worker in Danieal’s house twice a week to make sure she was safe.

But a Common Pleas Court jury Friday ruled that each played a role that inevitably led to an agonizing death for a 14-year-old girl with cerebral palsy who could not care for herself.

The jury deliberated seven hours before finding the three guilty on all charges:

Daniel Kelly Sr., 40, endangering the welfare of a child.

Poindexter, 54, child endangerment, recklessly endangering another person, and perjury.

Kamuvaka, 62, involuntary manslaughter, child endangerment, reckless endangerment, perjury, criminal conspiracy, and four charges involving what prosecutors called a “forgery fest” to create a case file to fool investigators into thinking Kelly actually got in-home services.

None showed any emotion as the verdicts were announced shortly before 4 p.m.

“It’s been five years and I am tremendously, tremendously gratified by the jury’s verdict,” said Acting First Assistant District Attorney Edward McCann, who with Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Selber got the case Aug. 4, 2006, upon Kelly’s death.

McCann praised the jury for seeing that all three played parts in the death in a fetid, two-bedoom apartment Kelly shared with her mother, Andrea, and eight siblings.

Andrea Kelly, 42, pleaded guilty to third-degree murder in 2009 and is serving a 20-to-40-year prison term.

Judge Jeffrey P. Minehart set sentencing for Sept. 6.

McCann said Daniel Kelly faces a seven-year prison term, Poindexter eight to 16 years, and Kamuvaka up to 25 years.

Defense attorneys – Earl G. Kauffman for Kelly, Joshua E. Scarpello for Kamuvaka, and Craig Hosay for Poindexter – said they would discuss possible appeals with their clients.

Scarpello said he had hoped the jury might acquit Kamuvaka of involuntary manslaughter.

“The only reason she went to trial is she didn’t want to admit she killed anybody, and that’s what that charge means,” Scarpello said.

Daniel Kelly and Kamuvaka have been in custody. Kelly’s bail was revoked this year after he fled to Indiana. Kamuvaka was in federal custody serving a 171/2-year term for health-care fraud involving Danieal Kelly’s case.

Minehart immediately revoked Poindexter’s bail, and deputies removed him from the courtroom.

When Danieal Kelly died, she weighed 42 pounds, the weight of an average 5-year-old. Authorities said she was lying on a feces-stained mattress, her back pocked with maggot-infested bedsores, one so deep it exposed her hipbone.

Her shocking death – and those of other children under DHS supervision – triggered a wholesale review of what DHS did to protect the city’s most vulnerable families.

The Inquirer published a series on the children’s deaths, and in 2006 Mayor John F. Street fired the top two DHS officials. Other employees followed, some retiring before they were fired.

In August 2008, a county investigating grand jury recommended charges against nine people – including the three who went to trial – and blasted a “toxic culture” at DHS where workers did not do their jobs and supervisors did not hold them accountable.

DHS Commissioner Anne Marie Ambrose released a statement Friday saying the verdicts “represent the closing of a sad chapter in the history of the department.”

Ambrose cited a 2011 report of a DHS oversight board of child-welfare experts that found post-Kelly agency changes have “led to increased child safety and to improved fairness in the decision-making process for families.”

Witnesses who testified during the nine-day trial outlined a series of events where adults responsible for Danieal Kelly’s welfare went missing or ignored reports of her tortured deterioration between 2003 and 2006.

Kelly Sr. was charged for abandoning his daughter and her year-older brother, Daniel Jr., with his ex-wife even though he took them from her 10 years earlier because of neglect.

Witnesses said Poindexter, a former DHS intake social worker, never visited the Kelly house to investigate neglect complaints involving Danieal and then kept his investigation file open for 21/2 years, preventing her from getting in-home services.

And the jury found Kamuvaka ignored reports that her MultiEthnic caseworker assigned to Danieal in April 2006 never went to the house.

Four months later, the girl was dead, and Kamuvaka convened an “all-hands” staff meeting on Aug. 4, 2006, to create a case file showing she had received services.

Defense attorneys argued that only Kelly’s mother was culpable for her death.

Daniel Kelly removed the children in 1995 after in-laws reported Andrea Kelly was neglecting them. He took them to Pittsburgh, where he was living with a girlfriend, and the couple and children then moved to Phoenix, where they had three other children.

Daniel Kelly and his two children returned to Philadelphia in July 2003 after he and his girlfriend separated.

They again started living with Andrea Kelly – who by then had seven other children – and other relatives. But in March 2004 Daniel Kelly was ejected from the house after arguing with his mother-in-law.

He never again saw Danieal. He testified that his ex-wife moved and would not say where she and the children were living, though he conceded he took no legal action for visitation.

Outcomes for Other Defendants in the Case

Following is the status of those charged by the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office in the Danieal Kelly case who did not go to trial:

Andrea Kelly, 42, Danieal’s mother, pleaded guilty in April 2009 to third-degree murder. She was sentenced to 20 to 40 years and is housed at the state prison in Muncy.

Julius Juma Murray, 54, Danieal’s last caseworker, an employee of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., pleaded guilty in February to involuntary manslaughter, conspiracy, and child endangerment, and was sentenced to four to eight years in prison. Murray is also serving an 11-year federal prison term for his conviction on health-care fraud and conspiracy. Murray, a native of Sierra Leone, is in federal custody and will face deportation after serving his sentence.

Laura Sommerer, 36, Danieal’s last city Department of Human Services caseworker, pleaded guilty in 2009 to child endangerment and was sentenced to four years’ probation.

Marie Moses, 37, a friend of Andrea Kelly, pleaded guilty in 2009 to perjury and was sentenced to three years’ probation.

Andrea Miles, now 21, Moses’ daughter and a friend of Andrea Kelly, pleaded guilty in Juvenile Court in 2008 to perjury and was sentenced to probation.

Diamond Brantley, 25, a friend of Andrea Kelly, pleaded guilty in 2009 to perjury and was sentenced to two years’ probation.

Other than Kamuvaka and Murray, those indicted in the federal probe who were associated with MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc. were:

Solomon Manamela, 53, MultiEthnic cofounder. He was convicted at trial and sentenced to 14 years in prison. Currently at federal prison at Fort Dix.

Earle McNeill, 74, MultiEthnic cofounder. He pleaded guilty to fraud charges and was sentenced to 71/2 years. Currently at federal prison in Butler, N.C.

Manuelita Buenaflor, 68, MultiEthnic cofounder and quality assurance supervisor. She pleaded guilty to fraud charges and was sentenced to three years in prison. Currently at federal prison in Danbury, Conn.

Mariam Coulibaly, 42, MultiEthnic caseworker convicted at trial of fraud. She was sentenced to 11 years. She is at the federal prison in Hazleton, W.Va.

Christiana Nimpson, 55, MultiEthnic social worker. She pleaded guilty to fraud charges and was sentenced to 20 months. Currently in transit between federal prisons.

Sotheary Chan, 42, MultiEthnic office worker, pleaded guilty to fraud charges and was sentenced to 15 months in prison. Currently in federal halfway house in Atlanta, Ga.

Patricia Burch, 58, former Philadelphia special education teacher who moonlighted for MultiEthnic. She pleaded guilty to lying to a federal grand jury and was sentenced to 24 months. Currently at federal prison in Alderson, W. Va.

- Joseph A. Slobodzian

Danieal Kelly’s Death Could Have Been Prevented

How do employees who would be fired in the private sector keep working for government agencies?

http://blogs.phillymag.com/the_philly_post/2011/07/15/danieal-kellys-death-prevented/#comments

Today the jury goes back to work in the Danieal Kelly case. Given the facts of the case, I would not want to be on that jury. Like many similar cases that make headlines way too late, this case caused people to wonder, “How could a child die when being monitored by DHS?” What we learn is that DHS—or an equivalent entity in other cities and states—isnot monitoring. This causes a great hue and cry, reforms are made, and then it happens again with another child who comes to our attention only after abuse, neglect or death.

I recognize that the system is underfunded, understaffed, that social workers have brutal jobs and are severely underpaid. But in my experience working in the mental health system, I have seen social workers go above and beyond for the people they serve in the most heroic way possible. The social workers on the front lines who make a difference in people’s lives are, in my opinion, as worthy of praise as firefighters and police officers. And they prove that it’s far from impossible to do the job well.

Because their jobs are so stressful, it’s key to have good managers who facilitate good performance but also hold them accountable when they don’t excel, or worse, when they are neglectful. In my experience, I was shocked to see how many employees were retained even when everyone at an agency knew they were doing a terrible job. In the private sector these employees would have been terminated, albeit after the requisite HR mandates. So why, in the nonprofit and public sector, are poor employees kept on?

Let me give you an example. At one agency, there was an employee who slept on the job every day. He worked at a place where people with mental illnesses came for help, comfort and company. They generally weren’t in crisis, but they were entitled to be treated with respect. To have the staffer on duty sleeping all the time—what message does this convey to the visitors, who are already treated poorly by society? This staffer failed to do other work that was unrelated to interacting with people, i.e., paperwork and the like. He slept and slept and slept.

He was thought of as a joke. His manager wanted him fired. But the administration was reluctant to make a move. In this case, it was a question of being understaffed. Would a replacement be any better? The pay was so incredibly low, and applicants were often unqualified. If he was fired without a suitable replacement, the agency would be violating laws by not having sufficient staff at the location. But initiating a hiring process would be tough too, given that the job would be posted publicly and Sleepytime would find out. There was also a feeling that this guy—who was working additional jobs to make ends meet—was entitled to his sleep. As is so often the case, the needs of the clients, as they are sometimes called, was absolutely secondary.

Another example: A woman employee at a different facility was having increasing trouble coming to work regularly. Her behavior was erratic when she was there. In fact, several times she compromised the safety of her clients with her bizarre behaviors. Everyone felt keenly for her because she wasn’t well. She needed help. In the meantime, though, she simply wasn’t fit to be responsible for people. But I heard she wasn’t being fired because the administration feared a lawsuit for wrongful termination or discrimination. This fear was deeply entrenched. Employees often said, “I can’t get fired. They’re terrified of lawsuits.” This enabled some pretty bad behavior.

There was another employee who called out of work every Monday after payday. Each time he called out, he’d say a different family member had died and he had to go to the funeral out of state. Pretty soon his whole family was dead, including distant cousins. He missed as much work as he could get away with without violating rules. He was in direct service, meaning that clients depended on him particularly. His cavalier attitude about attendance was disrespectful and caused his co-workers to have to pick up his slack, thereby causing problems for their clients. Yet everyone laughed about his “antics.” And his supervisors said they couldn’t fire him because no one had proof that he was lying. Other aspects of his performance were subpar as well.  Then he was accused of sexual harassment—which he’d been fired for at his last job. The accuser in this case was credible. But, to be fair (and I agree with this), the agency launched an investigation—an investigation that took a very long time. Ultimately, the results of the investigation were termed inconclusive. He kept his job.

And in a similar instance, an employee who was accused of sexual harassment—and was found culpable—was not terminated but simply demoted and moved to a different department. I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that the transfers I saw were not unlike the Catholic Church shifting guilty priests around.

In the case of Danieal Kelly, social worker Dana Poindexter’s employment history was appalling. In the private sector—and I’m talking even at a Barnes & Noble or something—he would have been fired 20 times over. But instead of working at a bookstore, he was responsible for safeguarding the lives of vulnerable children. The Inquirer has done excellent reporting on this case and revealed a very problematic work history. From the paper:

As a DHS intake social worker, Poindexter was assigned to investigate hotline allegations of child abuse or neglect. Poindexter had 60 days to file a report recommending services or close the case.

In a June 25, 2003, evaluation, [supervisor Donna] Grubb wrote that Poindexter still had eight cases assigned to him in 2001—all awaiting determinations.

“This failure to move your cases deprives children and families of the services that they desperately need,” Grubb wrote.

Emphasis mine because this kind of evaluation—that acknowledges he is not working hard enough to protect children—was probably filed away in an HR drawer somewhere and essentially forgotten. I have seen that countless times. Rather than sound an alarm and say, “He is jeopardizing lives!” things just move along. Also from the Inky:

DHS social worker Catherine Mondi testified that she was sent to investigate the Kelly household on June 20, 2004, after an anonymous call to the DHS hotline….. Mondi, who said she believed Andrea Kelly and her children needed services immediately, told the jury she followed DHS protocol and reported to Poindexter.

More than a year later, on September 15, 2005, social worker Trina Jenkins testified that she was sent to the Kelly household, at a new address, responding to another anonymous hotline call. Jenkins said she also found Andrea Kelly overwhelmed and, two years after Danieal’s case was first opened, none of the children was in school and Danieal had not received medical or therapeutic care…. Like Mondi a year earlier, Jenkins said she went to Poindexter and his supervisor, Janice Walker, but got a hostile reception.

The blog Dreamin Demon (which I confess to being unfamiliar with) puts things more bluntly:

Poindexter received a report in October 2002 about Andrea Kelly’s children living in a house with no gas, no water, no working toilets, and a collapsed roof. All he had to do was determine, by December 8, 2002, that the Kelly family needed services or that the children were not at risk. However, he did nothing. And this was crucial for Danieal, because whenever a case is not properly closed by the intake unit, any subsequent reports will go to the worker with the unclosed case: in this case, Dana Poindexter. Danieal’s family was hotlined four more times between October 2002 and April 2005. All four reports landed on the desk of Dana Poindexter. And every single time, he did nothing. NOTHING. According to the grand jury’s report, he “failed to complete a single investigative report, progress note, risk assessment, or any other document required by DHS.” …

In April 2007, a detective with the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office searched Poindexter’s work area. In his cubicle, she found a cardboard box large enough to hold a file cabinet. It was filled to the top with case files, food wrappers and unopened mail (some four years old). At the bottom of the box was the Kelly family file. …

And yes, of course, the story becomes even worse when you consider that Poindexter’s immediate supervisor Janice Walker referred to his paperwork as “horrendous” yet gave him satisfactory and even superior ratings on his evaluations. Not enough for you? Janice Walker’s immediate supervisor Martha Poller falsified DHS records to conceal Poindexter’s nonperformance. Poller subsequently was promoted … to oversee child fatality reviews.

So now that you’ve read all this, are you surprised Danieal Kelly died? I’m not. I wish I were.

Commet from this story:
George Arthur Says:
July 16th, 2011 at 11:27 pm
You really disappoint me but I shouldn’t be surprised since all the profesional journalists have accepted the Grand Jury report. I am speaking specifically of your statement that “Martha Poller falsified records to conceal Pondexter’s nonperformance. That is simply not true despite what the vicious and sarcastic grand jury report said. (By the way if you think the report was written by anyone other than the D.A. specifically Ed McCann you are deluding yourself. Martha took action to facilitate the transfer of the case. When she testified at the trial the District Attorney even conceded that that was her motivation. I know because I was there. I am her husband. Yes, what happened was horrible to that child. And yes, Martha concedes that perhaps she should have been tougher with Dana. But please do not contribute to the mob mentality and hysteria. You are entitled to your own opinion but not to your own facts.

Prosecution grills Danieal’s father at trial

July 13, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

Daniel Kelly Sr. said he loved his disabled daughter Danieal, would never have done anything to harm her, and had accepted that she “would be totally dependent on me for the rest of her life.”

He also conceded that he had “procrastinated” when it had come to such things as getting Danieal a new wheelchair, eyeglasses, and doctor visits and enrolling her in school.

And when his ex-wife and her mother ejected him from the house, moved with the children, and refused to provide new contact information, Kelly acknowledged, he did not go to police, a lawyer, Family Court, or anyone else to fight for visitation.

By turns polite and prickly, soft-spoken and sarcastic, Kelly tried Wednesday to convince a Philadelphia jury that he bore no responsibility for Danieal’s 2006 starvation death.

“You loved your daughter?” asked defense attorney Earl G. Kauffman.

“I loved her very much,” Kelly quietly replied. “I loved her with all my heart.”

“Did you do anything to put her in a dangerous situation?” Kauffman continued.

“Never,” Kelly replied.

Danieal, 14, who could not care for herself, was found dead Aug. 4, 2006, in her mother’s squalid two-bedroom West Philadelphia apartment. She weighed 42 pounds – the weight of a typical 5-year-old – and was on a feces-stained mattress, her back covered with maggot-infested bedsores, one that went bone-deep.

Kelly, 40, is charged with child endangerment on allegations that he abandoned Danieal and her year-older brother, Daniel Jr., in 2005 with ex-wife Andrea Kelly, though he had taken them from her 10 years earlier because of neglect.

Kelly was the only one of three on trial who chose to testify. The last defense witnesses are to testify Thursday morning, followed by closing arguments.

Kelly spent almost three hours before the Common Pleas Court jury, including an hour of rigorous questioning by acting First Assistant District Attorney Edward McCann.

McCann retraced Kelly’s custody of Danieal and her brother from 1995, when he took them to Pittsburgh after removing them from Andrea’s custody, to his return with them to Philadelphia in July 2003 after years living with a girlfriend in Arizona.

At each problem along the way, McCann pressed Kelly to explain what happened.

“Well, there were multiple reasons for that,” was Kelly’s common reply, as when he began a protracted tale of bureaucratic delays that kept him from getting Danieal care and schooling after returning to Philadelphia.

Finally, McCann cut Kelly off: “So, in nine months, she never went to school and never got her wheelchair and never got set up for services?”

Kelly paused: “That’s correct, sir.”

During seven days of testimony, prosecution witnesses portrayed Kelly as a father who had been there for his children only when he had someone’s support.

In Pittsburgh and Arizona, it was girlfriend Kathleen Ward, who told the jury how Danieal had thrived getting physical therapy and going to a special-education school.

But when Kelly and Ward split in 1999 and he moved with the children to an apartment in Mesa, Ariz., the children stopped going to school.

Kelly acknowledged that he had depended on others – Ward’s mother and sister, a roommate’s girlfriend – to watch the children while he worked.

Ultimately, Kelly conceded that he had left the children alone, giving his son Ward’s phone number in an emergency. In October 2001, a report by his roommate’s girlfriend resulted in an intervention by Arizona child-protection services.

After returning to Philadelphia, Kelly said, he and the children briefly lived with Walter Ingram, Andrea’s uncle.

Kelly said he then had rented a house with his mother-in-law. Soon, Andrea and her seven other children joined him, followed by Andrea’s sister and her children and other relatives until 19 people lived in the house.

But in March 2004, Kelly said, he got into an argument with his mother-in-law about conditions in the house. Police were called, and he was ejected and told not to return.

After several months with a friend, Kelly got an apartment in South Philadelphia. He said he had seen his son once or twice before Danieal died; he never saw Danieal again.

Kelly insisted he had not abandoned his children. He said Ingram had given him reports of their condition but had refused to divulge an address or phone.

Kelly insisted he’d had no indication that Danieal’s condition had been deteriorating.

McCann, however, cited testimony by Ingram, who said he had told Kelly “the kids were not doing well.”

“That’s not what he told me, sir,” Kelly replied.

Also on trial are Mickal Kamuvaka and Dana Poindexter, social-service workers who prosecutors allege neglected their legal duty to ensure Danieal and her eight siblings were safe.

Kamuvaka, 62, was founder and top administrator of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., an agency hired by the city Department of Human Services to do twice-weekly in-home visits to ensure that Danieal and her eight siblings were safe and getting needed social services.

Kamuvaka is charged with involuntary manslaughter and counts involving falsifying paperwork to try to fool investigators into believing the Kelly household got the twice-weekly at-home visits DHS authorized.

Poindexter, 54, the first DHS social worker assigned to investigate neglect allegations against Danieal’s mother in September 2003, is charged with reckless endangerment and perjury. He is accused of never visiting the house and of keeping his investigation open for 21/2 years without recommending services.

Andrea Kelly, 42, pleaded guilty to third-degree murder in 2009 and is serving 20 to 40 years in prison.

Danieal Kelly’s death was ‘a matter of time,’ witness says

July 13, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, Inquirer Staff Writer

The death of Danieal Kelly – the 14-year old with cerebral palsy who starved to death in her mother’s West Philadelphia apartment – was “a matter of time,” testified a cofounder of the city-hired private agency that supposedly provided at-home visits and care to Danieal and her eight siblings.

Manuelita Buenaflor broke down before a Philadelphia jury Tuesday as she described the dysfunctional operations of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc.

Under a contract with the city Department of Human Services, the West Philadelphia firm was to send workers once, twice, even three times a week to visit and help Philadelphia’s poorest at-risk families and children in their homes.

But Buenaflor described an agency plagued with caseworkers who made “ghost visits” to families and papered files with phony case notes.

Buenaflor, “quality assurance supervisor” for MultiEthnic and cofounder with Mickal Kamuvaka, said her July 20, 2006, audit of the Kelly case showed no visits had been made to Danieal and her family since that March 29.

Two weeks after the audit, Danieal, who could not care for herself, was found dead in her mother’s fetid two-bedroom apartment. She weighed 42 pounds and was laying on a feces-stained mattress, her back covered with maggot-infested bedsores, one that went bone-deep.

“It was horrific,” said Buenaflor, weeping before the Common Pleas Court jury. “I don’t even want to remember it.”

Buenaflor, 68, a native Filipino and former missionary worker in Thailand, said ghost visits by MultiEthnic employees were so problematic that “it was just a matter of time, just a matter of time before someone would die.”

Buenaflor is serving a 36-month federal prison term after her 2009 guilty plea to wire and health-care fraud and conspiracy involving federal funds MultiEthnic took for performing nonexistent casework for DHS.

Buenaflor was a prosecution witness in the March 2010 federal trial in which Kamuvaka and three other MultiEthnic workers were convicted of fraud.

In June 2010, a federal judge sentenced Kamuvaka to 17 1/2 years in prison.

Buenaflor was one of a series of witnesses who testified as prosecutors completed their case against Kamuvaka, 62, MultiEthnic’s chief administrator; Dana Poindexter, 54, a former DHS social worker; and Danieal’s father, Daniel Kelly Sr., 40, for their alleged roles in Danieal’s Aug. 4, 2006 death.

Kamuvaka is charged with involuntary manslaughter and counts involving falsifying paperwork to try to fool investigators into believing Danieal and her family got the twice-weekly at-home visits DHS had authorized.

Poindexter, the first DHS social worker who was supposed to have investigated neglect allegations against Danieal’s mother in September 2003, is charged with reckless endangerment and perjury for allegedly never visiting the house.

Daniel Kelly is charged with child endangerment for allegedly abandoning Danieal and her year-older brother, Daniel Jr., in 2003 with his ex-wife, though he knew she had neglected them in the past.

When the trial resumes Wednesday at the city Criminal Justice Center, defense lawyers are to begin their cases.

Daniel Kelly’s attorney has said his client will testify. It is unknown whether Kamuvaka or Poindexter will do the same.

Lawyers for all three have argued that Andrea Kelly, Danieal’s mother, was solely responsible for the girl’s death. They contend that in early 2006 she moved with her children to another West Philadelphia address and kept their whereabouts secret from her ex-husband and other relatives.

Andrea Kelly, 42, pleaded guilty to third-degree murder in 2009 and is now serving 20 to 40 years in prison.

Ex-girlfriend paints Danieal Kelly’s father as loving dad, abusive partner

July 12, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, Inquirer Staff Writer
  • Danieal Kelly in a school photo in 1999-2000 in Arizona. In 2006, she died of starvationin Philadelphia.

    Danieal Kelly in a school photo in 1999-2000 in Arizona. In 2006, she died of starvationin Philadelphia.

An ex-girlfriend gave a Philadelphia jury a paradoxical portrait of Daniel Kelly Sr. as a loving father to his son and his disabled daughter, Danieal – and a paramour by whom she was beaten and abused during the four years they lived together.

“I wanted to come here to prove that Daniel loved his daughter and he would never do anything to hurt her,” testified Kathleen Ward, formerly Kathleen John, who flew from Arizona to testify in Daniel Kelly’s behalf on Monday.

Kelly, 40, is charged with child endangerment in the 2006 starvation death of Danieal Kelly, 14. Prosecutors allege that after Kelly and Ward split up, he returned with the children to Philadelphia in 2003 and abandoned them to their mother, his ex-wife Andrea Kelly.

Two child welfare workers are also on trial, charged with failing to ensure weekly visits to check on Danieal Kelly’s welfare.

The girl, who had cerebral palsy and could not move about or care for herself, was found dead on Aug. 4, 2006 in a two-bedroom West Philadelphia apartment she shared with her mother and eight siblings.

An autopsy ruled that she starved to death. Her weight was down from 100 to 42 pounds, and she was found on an excrement-stained mattress, her back pocked with deep bedsores.

The jury also heard testimony Monday that there was almost no paperwork involving Danieal Kelly or her family when detectives searched the cubicle of Dana Poindexter, 54, the Department of Human Services social worker assigned to investigate neglect allegations. What paperwork existed was at the bottom of a five-foot-tall cardboard box filled with trash, debris, and unopened mail.

Other prosecution witnesses testified that Mickal Kamuvaka, 62, the head of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a DHS subcontractor, held a mandatory staff meeting on Aug. 4, 2006, to create paperwork to document twice-weekly visits to the Kelly household that never happened.

Prosecutors are expected to complete their case Tuesday.

Kelly’s lawyer Earl G. Kauffman, with the agreement of judge and prosecutors, was allowed to call Ward to testify out of turn, in the middle of the prosecution case, to accommodate her flight schedule.

Ward, who lived with Daniel Kelly and children Danieal and Daniel Jr. from 1995 to 1999 in Pittsburgh and then Phoenix, provided crucial testimony supporting the elder Kelly.

Ward, who also had three daughters with Kelly during their time together, wept continually as she remembered her two stepchildren.

Prosecutors have said Ward gave Danieal and brother Daniel Jr. the only loving home atmosphere they knew.

“I was her mom,” Ward said, describing how Danieal thrived in Arizona in a special education school and regular physical therapy.

“She was the joy and blessing of my life,” Ward told the Common Pleas Court jury.

She said Kelly was a full partner helping raise his two children and their three girls.

“He never treated her bad – ever,” Ward said of Kelly’s feelings toward Danieal. “He loved her to death.”

Under questioning by Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Selber, Ward also detailed a darker side to Kelly – a man she reluctantly acknowledged beat and abused her in their time together.

Once, Ward said, Kelly hit her in the head with a phone receiver and she needed stitches to close the wound. Another time, Ward said, Kelly called her an epithet and spat in her face.

Ward also acknowledged that Arizona police once investigated a child-abuse complaint after Kelly struck Daniel Jr. with an electric cord, leaving three large welts on the young boy.

But Ward insisted Kelly loved his children: “He may have been tough with Dan-Dan but he still loved his children.”

Ward said she lost touch with Daniel Jr. and Danieal when Kelly took them back to Philadelphia and Andrea Kelly would not let her speak to the two children.

A key part of Kelly Sr.’s defense is that Andrea Kelly hid the children, changed phone numbers, and refused to divulge her new address to her ex-husband or others.

Andrea Kelly, 42, pleaded guilty in 2009 to third-degree murder in her daughter’s death and is serving a 20-to-40-year sentence.

Two testify of severe decline in Danieal Kelly’s health over five years

July 07, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, Inquirer Staff Writer

The Arizona special education teacher and the Philadelphia school psychologist each knew Danieal Kelly – separated by five years.

Both agreed on one thing: They would never have recognized the Danieal the other knew.

The contrasting portraits of Kelly, a 14-year-old with cerebral palsy, dominated testimony Wednesday in the criminal trial of the girl’s father and two social services workers for their alleged roles in the starving death in 2006.

Teacher Lynn Levin recalled the 9-year-old girl who attended Madison Rose Lane School in Phoenix from 1999 to 2001.

In two hours of testimony, Levin told the Common Pleas Court jury that despite her physical and mental limitations, Kelly loved school, was learning to speak, and sang along with a Shania Twain recording.

“Her personality was so sweet, so endearing,” Levin testified. “She was appreciative for whatever was being done with her or for her.”

The Danieal Kelly seen by Philadelphia School District psychologist Wendy Galson on June 12, 2006, at a school admissions evaluation at her mother’s West Philadelphia house, was anything but.

“She appeared thin, small, and she was sitting in a larger umbrella stroller,” said Galson. The Danieal she met did not speak, screamed loudly when Galson tried to move her stroller, and was unable to tolerate even an hour’s evaluation.

Less than two months later, she was dead, her weight down from 100 to 42 pounds, her body dehydrated and pocked with deep bedsores.

Galson looked shocked when Acting First Assistant District Attorney Edward McCann projected a photo of a grinning, exuberant Danieal in Arizona at a school party.

“Look at her chubby cheeks,” said Galson, who also commented on the flexibility of Danieal’s arms, which were raised in a cheer.

When she met Kelly, Galson said, her arms and hands were curled and locked close to her body, the result of a lack of physical therapy.

Danieal’s father, Daniel Sr., 40, is charged with child endangerment for leaving her with his ex-wife, Andrea, whom he knew had neglected her before.

Daniel Kelly had taken their two children, Daniel Jr. and Danieal, from Andrea Kelly’s custody in 1996. He and the children moved to Arizona with his girlfriend; the three returned to Philadelphia in 2003 when the relationship ended and he then again left the children with his ex-wife.

Andrea Kelly, 42, has pleaded guilty to third-degree murder and is serving 20 to 40 years in prison.

Two others are charged with failing to provide at-home social services deemed crucial to Danieal Kelly’s health and safety and then lying about it.

Dana Poindexter, 54, a former intake social worker at the Department of Human Services, was supposed to investigate child-abuse complaints, verify them, and, if they were found to be true, start the process of getting services.

Also charged is Mickal Kamuvaka, 62, cofounder and chief administrator of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a now-defunct DHS contractor that was paid to have a worker monitor the health and safety of Danieal Kelly, her brother, and Andrea Kelly’s eight other children.

Daniel Kelly’s lawyer has said Kelly will testify in his own defense. Lawyers for Poindexter and Kamuvaka have said that only Andrea Kelly is responsible for Danieal’s death.

Also testifying Wednesday was DHS social worker John Dougherty, who on Aug. 4, 2006, was sent to investigate after the girl was found dead.

Dougherty called the house in the 1700 block of Memorial Avenue “one of the worst I’d ever seen.”

“The house was deplorable, full of clothing and debris. The smell was atrocious. It hit you when you first walked in,” said Dougherty.

Dougherty’s testimony supported the prosecution’s claim that the two social workers on trial never provided services – including twice-weekly visits to the home – approved for the Kelly family.

Dougherty testified that the DHS caseworker responsible for the Kelly household, Laura Sommerer, joined him on that 2006 emergency call.

Dougherty said Sommerer was supposed to have inspected the Kelly house at least once a month. The household was also supposed to receive twice-weekly visits from Julius Juma Murray, a MultiEthnic employee.

Sommerer, now 36, pleaded guilty to child endangerment in 2009 and was sentenced to four years probation.

Murray, 53, pleaded guilty in February to involuntary manslaughter, conspiracy, and child endangerment, and was sentenced to four to eight years in prison.

On Tuesday, Daniel Kelly Jr., now 20, testified that he recalled just three social worker visits to the home in the three years he and his sister lived with their mother in West Philadelphia.

Danieal Kelly trial: Damning memos read

BRIAN HICKEY
PHILADELPHIA
Published: July 07, 2011 10:00 p.m.
Last modified: July 08, 2011 9:27 a.m.
As the child-endangerment trial of Danieal Kelly’s father and two social workers continued Thursday, a retired DHS supervisor testified that the worker assigned to the case faced numerous reprimands and suspensions on the job.Danieal Kelly’s father, Daniel, and two social workers, Mikal Kamuvaka and Dana Poindexter, are on trial for their alleged roles in the 14-year-old cerebral-palsy stricken girl’s gruesome, DHS-altering death.Reading from her evaluations of Poindexter, Donna Grubbs, who retired from DHS in 2006, said it’s “obvious you care less and less about your responsibilities as a social worker.” She then spoke about another case that Poindexter “put on a back burner,” but when police responded, they “became nauseated when they entered the house.”

When Poindexter received a 10-day suspension, a memo from then DHS Commissioner Alba Martinez concluded, “I hope this is the last time we have to remind you of these issues.” It wasn’t.

When DHS case worker Catherine Mondi fielded a hotline call about Danieal in 2004 — that she could be heard screaming at times and didn’t receive necessary services — she deferred to Poindexter, who was already assigned. She would die two years later.

Daniel Kelly is expected to testify.

Danieal Kelly trial bores in on record of social worker

July 09, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, Inquirer Staff Writer

When Philadelphia social worker Dana Poindexter was suspended in August 2008, after a grand jury recommended criminal charges for his role in the 2006 starvation death of Danieal Kelly, his bosses could not have been shocked.

After all, Poindexter’s supervisors in the Department of Human Services had already suspended him three times – twice in 2003 and once in 2005 – including one incident where an infant in his caseload died at home.

But Poindexter remained a DHS employee and even got a “superior” rating on a job evaluation two months before a 30-day suspension in 2005.

Poindexter’s troubled work history – and DHS’s inability to get rid of an employee one former supervisor said “didn’t seem to want to be a social worker” – was dissected Friday in the Common Pleas Court trial of him and two others in the death of the disabled 14-year-old girl.

Danieal’s father, Daniel Kelly Sr., 40, is charged with child endangerment. He allegedly abandoned Danieal Kelly and her year-older brother, Daniel Jr., with their mother, Andrea, in 2003 after returning with them to Philadelphia following several years living with a girlfriend in Arizona.

Also charged is Mickal Kamuvaka, 62, cofounder and onetime chief administrator of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a now-defunct DHS contractor paid to do twice-weekly visits to monitor Danieal Kelly’s welfare after the case was taken from Poindexter in September 2005.

Poindexter is charged with child endangerment, as well as perjury over what he told the grand jury.

Lawyers for the three contend that only Andrea Kelly is responsible for her daughter’s death. Andrea Kelly, 42, pleaded guilty to third-degree murder and is serving 20 to 40 years in prison.

Poindexter’s attorney Craig Hosay struggled Friday to rehabilitate his client’s image before the jury. He spent more than an hour questioning Martha Poller, a retired DHS administrator, about Poindexter’s job evaluations.

Hosay focused particularly on Poindexter’s Aug. 1, 2006, review, in which supervisor Janice Walker rated him “superior” in every category.

Hosay got Poller to confirm what he has described as personal animosity between Poindexter and his previous supervisor, Donna Grubb. Hosay also noted that Poindexter’s performance improved under Walker, who had supervised him years before as well.

Grubb, who has retired from DHS, testified Thursday that Poindexter was suspended for 10 days in 2003 after the death of a three-week-old infant.

Social worker’s performance at issue in Danieal Kelly trial

July 08, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

When Philadelphia social worker Dana Poindexter was suspended in August 2008, after a grand jury recommended criminal charges for his role in the 2006 starvation death of Danieal Kelly, his bosses could not have been shocked.

After all, Poindexter’s supervisors in the Department of Human Services had already suspended him three times – twice in 2003 and once in 2005 – including one incident where an infant in his caseload died at home.

But Poindexter remained a DHS employee and even got a “superior” rating on a job evaluation two months before a 30-day suspension in 2005.

Poindexter’s troubled work history – and DHS’s inability to get rid of an employee one former supervisor said “didn’t seem to want to be a social worker” – was dissected Friday in the Common Pleas Court trial of him and two others in the death of the disabled 14-year-old girl.

Danieal’s father, Daniel Kelly Sr., 40, is charged with child endangerment. He allegedly abandoned Danieal Kelly and her year-older brother, Daniel Jr., with their mother, Andrea, in 2003 after returning with them to Philadelphia following several years living with a girlfriend in Arizona.

Also charged is Mickal Kamuvaka, 62, cofounder and onetime chief administrator of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a now-defunct DHS contractor paid to do twice-weekly visits to monitor Danieal Kelly’s welfare after the case was taken from Poindexter in September 2005.

Poindexter is charged with child endangerment, as well as perjury over what he told the grand jury.

Lawyers for the three contend that only Andrea Kelly is responsible for her daughter’s death. Andrea Kelly, 42, pleaded guilty to third-degree murder and is serving 20 to 40 years in prison.

Poindexter’s attorney Craig Hosay struggled Friday to rehabilitate his client’s image before the jury. He spent more than an hour questioning Martha Poller, a retired DHS administrator, about Poindexter’s job evaluations.

Hosay focused particularly on Poindexter’s Aug. 1, 2006, review, in which supervisor Janice Walker rated him “superior” in every category.

Hosay got Poller to confirm what he has described as personal animosity between Poindexter and his previous supervisor, Donna Grubb. Hosay also noted that Poindexter’s performance improved under Walker, who had supervised him years before as well.

Grubb, who has retired from DHS, testified Thursday that Poindexter was suspended for 10 days in 2003 after the death of a three-week-old infant.

Grubb testified that Poindexter had been assigned in September 2002 to investigate reports of neglect involving three siblings. Poindexter visited one of the siblings, a boy, at his school and reported that “the child appeared to be safe.”

But Poindexter’s file noted that he went to the home to check on the boy’s sisters, found no one there, left his business card, and never returned. On Dec. 20, 2002, DHS was notified that a 3-week-old baby born to the boy’s 14-year-old sister had died.

Under questioning by Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Selber, Poller confirmed Poindexter’s other suspensions, including one of 30 days in October 2005.

Poller said Poindexter was suspended – and Walker orally reprimanded – after Poindexter was sent to take a 14-year-old girl from her school to a grandmother’s house after the girl reported she was abused at home.

Poindexter picked up the girl, Poller testified, but the grandmother was not home, so he dropped her off at 52d and Jefferson Streets with bus tokens and a few dollars to get to her grandmother’s later.

The grand jury that recommended charges in Kelly’s death criticized DHS’s management then as a “toxic culture” where caseworkers failed to do their jobs and supervisors failed to hold them accountable.

Friday, Poller said she was not sure if Poindexter should have been suspended. She said she agreed to the discipline only after meeting with her boss and a city personnel officer.

As an intake social worker, Poindexter was supposed to investigate and refer a case for at-home services within 60 days, or close the case. When the Kelly file was taken from him in September 2005, it was still uninvestigated after three years.

Though the Kelly case was given to a new social worker to arrange at-home services through MultiEthnic, prosecutors allege that the DHS subcontractor did almost as little as Poindexter.

Kelly, who had cerebral palsy and could not care for herself, starved to death Aug. 4, 2006, in the filthy two-bedroom West Philadelphia apartment she shared with her mother and eight siblings. She weighed just 42 pounds and was resting in her own waste on a bare mattress, her back covered with deep bedsores.

Philadelphia jury hears Danieal Kelly’s brother

July 06, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, Inquirer Staff Writer

Though he lived with his mother and nine siblings, 15-year-old Daniel Kelly Jr. knew he was the only one responsible for himself and his severely disabled 14-year-old sister, Danieal.

His father had abandoned them in 2003 to the care of their mother, who had moved them all to a squalid two-bedroom apartment in West Philadelphia without heat, electricity, or water.

“After a while, I would take care of me and my sister because nobody else would,” Kelly told a Philadelphia jury Tuesday.

Kelly, now 20, testified in the criminal trial of his father and namesake and two social workers charged for their alleged roles in the events leading to the Aug. 4, 2006, starvation death of Danieal Kelly.

Kelly testified that in 2006, Danieal, who had cerebral palsy and could not move around or care for herself, was losing weight and becoming increasingly incommunicative.

The night before Danieal died, Kelly said, he tried to give her water and begged his mother to call an ambulance.

Kelly said Andrea Kelly refused: “She’s just sick, she’ll get over it tomorrow.”

Kelly said he woke the next morning and “heard her [his mother] crying. I already knew what happened.”

Kelly described a childhood of constant deprivation at the hands of a father who seemed not to care about his children and a mother unable to care for them or her eight other children.

Daniel Kelly Sr., 40, is charged with child endangerment for leaving his children with his ex-wife, whom he knew had neglected them before.

Two others are charged with failing to provide at-home social services deemed vital for the safety and health of Danieal and her siblings and then lying about it.

Dana Poindexter, 54, a former intake social worker for the city Department of Human Services, was supposed to investigate child-abuse complaints, verify them, and, if true, start the process of getting services.

Mickal Kamuvaka, 62, was cofounder and chief administrator of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a now-defunct DHS contractor assigned to monitor the health and safety of Danieal and the children who lived with Andrea Kelly.

Andrea Kelly, 42, has pleaded guilty to third-degree murder and is serving 20 to 40 years in prison.

Daniel Kelly Jr. was the first witness Tuesday as the prosecution resumed its case before a Common Pleas Court jury.

He testified in a soft monotone, staring at the tabletop as if in shock. He looked at his father only when asked to identify him by acting First Assistant District Attorney Edward McCann.

The elder Kelly watched his son without apparent emotion. Only when Daniel Kelly Jr. testified that his father had disciplined him by “whippings” with an electric cord, and that he once had kicked Danieal because she ground her teeth at night, did the elder Kelly furrow his brow and shake his head from side to side.

According to court documents, the elder Kelly took his children from his ex-wife in 1996 after finding them neglected. He took them to Pittsburgh and began a relationship with a woman named Kathleen John.

The following year Kelly, John, and his two children moved to Phoenix, Ariz.

Daniel Kelly Jr. told the jury his “stepmother” was his only good childhood memory. Both he and Danieal went to school and she began flourishing: learning to speak and, with therapy, gaining some use of her hands and arms.

Daniel Kelly Jr. wept when McCann showed him photographs of Danieal, laughing, at her birthday party, taken in Arizona.

But Daniel Kelly Sr. and John separated, and he and the children moved to an apartment. They no longer went to school, his son said, and Danieal got no more therapy.

At night, he said, his father went to work, leaving them alone.

After they returned to Philadelphia in 2003, Kelly said, his father again left them in the care of their mother and moved out.

He saw his father once more before his sister died and once afterward, the younger Kelly testified.

As for the twice-weekly visits from social workers the “at-risk” family was supposed to get through DHS, Kelly recalled two or three visits.

Prosecutors say Danieal, who weighed about 100 pounds when she lived in Arizona, weighed just 42 pounds when she was found dead in her mother’s West Philadelphia apartment. Her body was riddled with maggot-infested bedsores, one of which went to the bone.

Danieal Kelly’s body appeared to be decomposing, opening witness says in neglect trial

July 02, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, Inquirer Staff Writer

Helen Garczynski said the call to the Philadelphia Examiner’s Office was unusual: the decomposing body of a 14-year-old.

Even with a long list of bodies to be retrieved for autopsies from around the city, said Garczynski, the Aug. 4, 2006, call about a child was enough for her to immediately be dispatched to the scene.

She said the 1700 block of Memorial Avenue in West Philadelphia was eerie: “The whole street seemed like it was condemned. It didn’t look like nobody lived there.”

But police were in front of 1722, Garczynski said, and with them a little boy who asked, “Can my Nana say goodbye to my sister?”

Inside the filthy, stinking house, Garczynski said, was the recently dead Danieal Kelly, whose body was so emaciated and bedsore-ridden it must have appeared decomposed to police.

Garczynski was the first prosecution witness Friday in the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court trial of the disabled child’s father, Daniel Kelly, 40, and two social services workers for their alleged roles in Danieal’s starving by her troubled mother.

Andrea Kelly, 41, pleaded guilty in 2009 to third-degree murder and is serving 20 to 40 years in prison.

Garczynski, a veteran of 11 years with the Medical Examiner’s Office, told the jury it was clear Danieal, who had cerebral palsy and could not move around or care for herself, had lived in unspeakable conditions for some time.

Feces were piled on the floor in front of the bed as if someone had brushed them off, she testified.

Garczynski said the odor from the girl’s body was “real bad, but it wasn’t the normal decomposing body smell I’m used to. It was more like some infectious smell.”

Garczynski said Danieal was wrapped in sheets on a bed in a rear first-floor room. The house had no electricity, running water, or ventilation.

The body was abuzz with flies, and maggots were crawling from a bedsore. She said Danieal’s body was literally “embedded into the mattress.”

“I actually had to physically pull her from the bed,” Garczynski testified.

After Garczynski’s testimony, the trial recessed for the Independence Day holiday. Testimony resumes Tuesday.

In her opening to the jury, Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Selber acknowledged that Andrea Kelly killed Danieal.

But Kelly’s ex-husband, social worker Dana Poindexter, and social services agency head Mickal Kamuvaka each committed acts that “predictably and inevitably led to her death,” Selber said.

Each had a “legal duty of care” to Danieal that they ignored, Selber said.

In their openings, the defense lawyers – Earl G. Kauffman for Kelly, Craig Hosay for Poindexter, and Joshua Scarpello for Kamuvaka – said Danieal’s mother alone caused her death.

Andrea Kelly secreted her eight children and undermined efforts to locate and get care for Danieal and her siblings, they said. They said prosecutors were trying to spread blame for a notorious tragedy that should not have happened.

Kauffman said Kelly, charged with child endangerment, will testify and tell how he cared for Danieal.

Poindexter, 54, was an intake social worker for the city Department of Human Services who Selber said ignored five reports about Danieal’s mistreatment. Poindexter is charged with child endangerment, recklessly endangering another person, and perjury.

Kamuvaka, 62, was cofounder and chief administrator of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a now-defunct private firm DHS hired to monitor the health and safety of Danieal and her siblings.

Kamuvaka is charged with involuntary manslaughter, child endangerment, conspiracy, and counts involving an alleged cover-up of the circumstances surrounding Danieal’s death.

Starvation death trial opens on gruesome note

July 01, 2011|By Joseph A. Slobodzian, INQUIRER STAFF WRITER
http://articles.philly.com/2011-07-01/news/29726647_1_danieal-kelly-mickal-kamuvaka-starvation-death
A technician for the Philadelphia Medical Examiner’s Office described to a Common Pleas Court jury today the gruesome scene in the West Philadelphia house where 14-year-old Danieal Kelly’s body was found.“It smelled real bad, but it wasn’t the normal decomposing body smell I’m used to,” testified Helen Garczynski, recalling the early afternoon of Aug. 4, 2006, when police let her inside the house in the 1700 block of Memorial Avenue in West Philadelphia.“It was more like some like some infectious smell,” Garczynski.

Police then led Garczynski to the rear first-floor room where the rigid, nearly skeletal body of Danieal was in a bed, wrapped in sheets.

The body was abuzz with flies, and maggots were crawling from a bedsore. Garczynski said the girl’s body was literally “embedded into the mattress.”

“I actually had to physically pull her from the bed,” Garczynski testified.

Garczynski was the first witness to testify in the start of the trial of the girl’s father, Daniel Kelly, 40, and two social services workers for their roles that allegedly led to the disabled child’s starvation death at the hands of her mother.

Andrea Kelly, 41, pleaded guilty to third-degree murder and is now serving a 20-to-40-year prison term for third-degree murder.

In her opening statement to the jury, Assistant District Attorney Jennifer Selber acknowledged that only Andrea Kelly killed her daughter, who was born premature with cerebral palsy and could not move around on her own.

But Kelly’s ex-husband, social worker Dana Poindexter, and social services agency head Mickal Kamuvaka committed acts that “predictably and inevitably led to her death,” Selber said.

In their openings, the three defense attorneys said the blame for Danieal’s death rests solely on the mother, who hid her family and undermined efforts to locate and care for Danieal and her siblings. Defense attorneys said prosecutors were trying to spread blame for a tragedy that should not have happened.

Daniel Kelly’s lawyer, Earl G. Kauffman, told the jury that Kelly – charged with child endangerment – would testify in his own defense and describe how he tried to see that Danieal received proper care.

After the first witness, the trial recessed for the Independence Day holiday weekend. Testimony resumes Tuesday before Judge Jeffrey P. Minehart.

Poindexter, 54, was an intake social worker for the city Department of Human Services who, the grand jury alleged, tossed Danieal’s case file into a trash-filled file box. Poindexter is charged with child endangerment, recklessly endangering another person, and perjury.

Kamuvaka, 62, was cofounder and chief administrator of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a now-defunct private firm hired by DHS to monitor the health and safety of Danieal and eight siblings who lived with Andrea Kelly.

Kamuvaka is charged with involuntary manslaughter, child endangerment, conspiracy and a half-dozen other counts involving record-tampering and perjury – part of an alleged cover-up of the circumstances surrounding Danieal’s gruesome death

Judge: Patronage led to Danieal Kelly death

Friday, June 11, 2010

By MARYCLAIRE DALE

http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=7489300

object>

PHILADELPHIA – June 10, 2010 – Political patronage contributed to the starvation death of a disabled Philadelphia girl under the city’s watch, a federal judge said Thursday in sentencing a social-services contractor to 17 1/2 years in prison.

The city paid Michal Kamuvaka’s politically connected firm $1 million a year to ensure that its neediest families got specialized attention.

Company workers assigned to the chaotic home where 14-year-old Danieal Kelly was wasting away in a wheelchair were supposed to ensure she and her siblings had proper housing, schooling and medical care.

But after 10 months of supposed twice-weekly visits, Danieal, who had cerebral palsy, was still not enrolled in school and had not been seen by a doctor. By the time she died in the sweltering home in August 2006, she weighed 42 pounds and had maggot-infested bedsores.

City audits of Kamuvaka’s company, MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Services, were “laughable,” since the firm got a heads up weeks in advance to get its paperwork in order, U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell said Thursday.

Dalzell doubted that even a whistle-blower, had one stepped up, could have interested the city in the contractor’s failings.

“It was patronage – plain and simple,” Dalzell said. “It was a deal, and nobody was taking this seriously” within the city’s Department of Human Services.

Case worker Julius Murray made just 10 visits, not the 46 noted in records dummied up on orders from Kamuvaka after Danieal died, Dalzell found.

“Here was a woman with a doctorate in social work who ran the operations of an agency so lackadaisically that, in the words of one of her colleagues, ‘It was just a matter of time’ that one of her charges died,” Dalzell said in giving Kamuvaka the maximum term and revoking her bail.

Later Thursday, Dalzell sentenced another company co-founder, Solomon Manamela, to 14 years for his role in the fraud. Manamela, a 52-year-old political refugee from South Africa, faces deportation when he gets out.

“Part of me died (after Danieal did),” Manamela, who oversaw training, told the judge.

Kamuvaka, 61, came to the U.S. from Liberia on a college scholarship, and went on to earn a Ph.D. and become a beloved mentor to social-work students at Lincoln University, several of whom spoke on her behalf Thursday.

She and co-defendant Earle McNeill, 72, formed the company in about 2000 to bid on the city contract. They had no other clients, and their primary experience was with adults and addicts.

“McNeill was, by whatever magic, indeed able to win the … (contract) in the summer of 2000, notwithstanding the reality that (the company) had no experience whatever in dealing with ‘at risk’ children,” Dalzell wrote in a recent opinion.

Even after Danieal died, the judge said Thursday, Kamuvaka visited an ally at City Hall, a DHS program director, in an effort to keep and even extend the $3.7 million, multiyear contract.

Then-acting Health Commissioner Carmen Paris soon ordered a coroner not to release the grim autopsy results, the coroner testified at Kamuvaka’s trial this year. But it was too late. Investigators – and the public – were becoming aware of the case. Paris resigned in 2008, days after a 258-page county grand jury report on Danieal’s death accused her of interfering with the investigation.

“It took a lot of people to kill this little girl,” said Dalzell, who faulted MultiEthnic, City Hall and the school district, which also made a home visit.

But the blame starts, he said, with the girl’s parents. Her mother, Andrea Kelly, is serving a 20- to 40-year state sentence after pleading guilty to third-degree murder. The girl’s father, Daniel Kelly, was accused of abandoning his daughter and faces child-endangerment charges.

Kamuvaka and Murray also still face a November trial in state court on involuntary manslaughter charges.

In all, nine MultiEthnic employees were convicted in the federal case – Kamuvaka, Manamela and two others at trial and five others through pleas. McNeill was previously sentenced to 7-1/2 years. The two others who went to trial will be sentenced Friday.

“I don’t think anybody should think of Dr. Kamuvaka as an evil person,” defense lawyer William Cannon argued. “This situation certainly got away from her, there’s no denying that. But that she would be indifferent to the situation that enveloped Danieal would just not be accurate.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Bea Witzleben said the case is not one where children fell through the cracks. The Kellys, and other families ill-served by MultiEthnic, were identified by the city and assigned help.

“She (Kamuvaka) asked for this responsibility. She was given it and paid for it,” Witzleben said. “There was hope for that child to have a decent life.”

Two social-service administrators get long jail terms in Danieal’s death

June 11, 2010|By MICHAEL HINKELMAN, hinkelm@phillynews.com 215-854-2656

Two administrators and co-founders of a city-funded social-service agency, convicted in March of conspiracy and fraud charges stemming from the death of Danieal Kelly, were sentenced yesterday to long terms in federal prison.

Kelly, who was 14 and had cerebral palsy, died in August 2006 from bedsores and malnutrition.

Mickal Kamuvaka, 61, who ran the day-to-day operations of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., was sentenced to 17 1/2 years by U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell.

Solomon Manamela, 52, a supervisor of caseworkers at MultiEthnic, drew a 14-year sentence.

Dalzell ordered both defendants taken into custody immediately.

The Department of Human Services had hired MultiEthnic to provide in-home social services to 500 families with children at risk of abuse or neglect. The agency was paid more than $3.6 million between July 2000 and December 2006.

Authorities said that after Kelly died, Kamuvaka, who is known as “Dr. K” and who has a doctorate from the University of Pennsylvania, orchestrated a fraud to backdate and falsify records in an attempt to fool city auditors into thinking that the agency had been making visits to children, including Kelly, that never occurred.

When the feds began investigating, prosecutors said Kamuvaka convinced one former MultiEthnic co-worker to lie to federal agents and schemed to obstruct the federal grand jury’s investigation by withholding and shredding agency records related to Kelly and dumping them into a trash bin.

Before imposing sentence, Dalzell said Kamuvaka’s stewardship of MultiEthnic was so “lackadaisical” that it was “just a matter of time” before one of the children under its care would die.

The judge also said that Kamuvaka and Manamela had engaged in an “orgy of document fabrication” and that neither defendant appreciated the “full import” of the crimes.

Kamuvaka declined to address Dalzell at sentencing.

Defense attorney William Cannon said she wanted to preserve her appellate rights. He said in court papers that “should not be looked upon as some coldhearted indifference to . . . the tragic death” of Kelly.

Prosecutors said that nearly every MultiEthnic employee – with the exception of one – who was interviewed by investigators described some illegal or improper act Kamuvaka had asked or directed them to take.

Absent case worker for starved girl gets 11 years

Published: Friday, June 11, 2010

By MARYCLAIRE DALE,Associated Press Writer

http://www.delcotimes.com/articles/2010/06/11/news/doc4c1259e1c724d652744560.txt

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — The morals of social workers who routinely skipped home visits to Philadelphia’s most troubled families, leading to a disabled girl’s starvation death, reminded a federal judge Friday of the “banality of evil” seen in Europe during the Holocaust.

U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell sentenced the family’s case worker, Julius Juma Murray, 52, of Upper Darby, and another employee of a social-services contractor to 11 years each for fraud and obstruction.

Witnesses this week called the pair and their seven convicted co-defendants — who include a former missionary nun and doctoral-level social worker — good people for whom the charges are anomalies.

The comments reminded Dalzell of Nazi Party members who were kind to neighbors and dogs.

“‘The banality of evil.’ Isn’t that what’s going on here?” Dalzell asked, citing a phrase coined by political theorist Hannah Arendt. Arendt, a German Jew, argued that the great evils in human history are committed not by psychopaths, but by ordinary people who accept the status quo.

Dalzell presided over a harrowing five-week trial this year that laboriously detailed the slow, painful demise of 14-year-old Danieal Kelly. She had cerebral palsy but had once thrived in the care of her father and his attentive girlfriend in Phoenix. A photograph from that era taken on a class trip shows a bright-eyed girl in pigtails grinning broadly for the camera.

But when his relationship failed, Daniel Kelly left Danieal with her unfit mother in Philadelphia, who was raising eight children in a squalid two-bedroom home.

By the time Danieal died in August 2006, starved and dehydrated, she weighed 42 pounds and had maggots crawling in her deep bedsores. She had not been to school or seen a doctor in the previous 10 months, despite being on the city’s radar.

The city was paying a startup firm called MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc. $1 million a year to focus on its neediest social-work cases.

But the politically connected firm — led by experienced, Ph.D.-level social worker Michal Kamuvaka — frequently skipped home visits, assigned student interns to the Kellys and other complex cases, and furiously forged documents to try to cover their tracks after Danieal died.

“‘Dr. K’ had a dozen people who just think she’s a saint. But we know just the contrary. We heard it over five weeks,” Dalzell said Friday. A day earlier, he had sentenced the 61-year-old Kamuvaka to 17 1/2 years in prison, despite pleas from friends and proteges.

Case worker Julius Juma Murray, 52, of Upper Darby, was supposed to be the final safety net for the long list of people who failed Danieal. But Murray — hired despite his lack of social work training — skipped visits as Danieal wasted away.

Andrea Kelly is serving 10 to 20 years for third-degree murder, and Daniel Kelly is charged with endangerment for allegedly abandoning her.

In all, nine MultiEthnic workers were convicted in the case, including case worker Mariam Coulibaly, sentenced Friday to 135 months. Coulibaly, 41, a mother of three from Brookhaven, had no role in Danieal’s death but helped forge documents, lied to the FBI and hid $50,000 after the verdict to shield it from the court-ordered restitution.

Danieal Kelly Starved to Death with Maggot-Infested Wounds; Social Workers Convicted in Fraud Case

By Edecio Martinez
March 5, 2010 1:42 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-6267226-504083.html?tag=contentMain;contentBody
PHILADELPHIA (CBS/AP) Four social workers have been convicted in a fraud case stemming from the starvation death of disabled Philadelphia teenager Danieal Kelly.

Photo: Danieal Kelly, 14, starved to death in August, 2006.

A federal jury in Philadelphia returned the verdicts Wednesday afternoon in the trial involving now-defunct MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc.

Company co-founders Mickal Kamuvaka, 60, and Solomon Manamela, 52, and former caseworkers Julius Juma Murray, 52, and Miriam Coulebaly, 41, were all convicted of conspiracy, lying to federal agents and multiple counts of health care fraud and wire fraud.

Prosecutors say the company defrauded the city of millions of dollars by not visiting needy families – then covering it up with false paperwork.

14-year-old Kelly, who had cerebral palsy, weighed less than half her expected weight when she was found dead in 2006, an expert witness for the prosecution testified. Officials also said she suffered from maggot-infested bedsores when she died.

“Danieal Kelly paid the ultimate price for these defendants’ fraud, and we hope that this is some measure of justice for her and the other children who were the victims, really, of this fraud,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Bea Witzleben said.

Kelly’s mother is already in prison after previously pleading guilty to third-degree murder. 

Ex-DHS worker receives probation Laura Sommerer, Danieal Kelly’s last social worker, got 4 years for endangering the child, who died at 14.

July 16, 2009|By Joseph A. Slobodzian INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

In sentencing the last Philadelphia social worker assigned to Danieal Kelly – the 14-year-old with cerebral palsy who starved to death in 2006 in her mother’s squalid apartment – a Philadelphia judge said yesterday that the woman’s bosses should have been charged with her.

“That the people at the top walked away from their positions and even advanced without any significant consequences is a crime which almost equals or maybe surpasses the crime in this case,” Common Pleas Court Judge Benjamin Lerner said.

Lerner made his remarks before sentencing Laura Sommerer, 34, to four years of probation for pleading guilty to child endangerment.

Even before the scathing grand-jury presentment in August resulted in criminal charges against Sommerer and eight others, including Danieal’s parents, the girl’s gruesome death had taken a toll among officials at the city Department of Human Services.

In October 2006, two months after Danieal’s death, DHS Commissioner Cheryl Ransom-Garner resigned, her deputy was fired, and a regional state welfare director was demoted. Carmen Paris, the city’s acting health commissioner when Danieal died, resigned days before the grand-jury report was made public.

After the criminal charges were filed, seven DHS administrators or supervisors were suspended without pay.

But only Sommerer and DHS caseworker Dana Poindexter, 52, her predecessor on the Kelly case, were criminally charged. Both were supposed to have ensured that contract caseworkers DHS hired visited Kelly’s house twice weekly to make sure she was well. It was later learned that she had not been visited for almost two months before her death.

In January, state welfare officials recognized improvements at DHS by restoring its full operating license, although they warned that “much more work needs to be done.”

Lerner said DHS’s management problems had persisted through several mayoral administrations and said, “I hope things change. It’s a terrible thing that it takes the example of a case like this, and the unrelenting glare of publicity, before those changes occur.”

Sommerer’s sentence was far less than the 3 1/2 to seven years in prison she could have received. The sentence was negotiated by Assistant District Attorney Edward McCann and defense attorney Nathan J. Andrisani. Both said it took into account her cooperation in the criminal probe and good works in the community.

DHS Commissioner to Dismiss Laura Somerer and Dana Poindexter 

PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia Department of Human Services Commissioner, Anne Marie Ambrose announced her intent to terminate Laura Sommerer and Dana Poindexter, the two social workers indicted in the Danieal Kelly case.

Both Poindexter and Sommerer were subject to disciplinary panel hearings yesterday, during which their respective cases were evaluated by an internal committee of peers, supervisors, and union representatives. The Commissioner conducted a careful review of all the evidence presented. Her decision to release Sommerer and Poindexter is in line with the disciplinary panel’s recommendations. 

The investigation of seven other DHS employees with varying degrees of involvement in the Kelly case is ongoing. In the meantime we continue to review cases and visit families to assure safety. All seven individuals remain on suspension.
Commissioner Ambrose said “it is our mission at DHS to support and protect vulnerable children. I intend to hold every staff member and provider accountable for upholding that mission.” 

Plea deals reached in DHS case stemming from 14 year old’s death

June 11, 2009 — 11:45am ET | By  

http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/plea-deals-reached-dhs-case-stemming-14-year-olds-death/2009-06-11

One employee from the social-service agency MultiEthnic Behavioral Health has plead guilty to charges of fraud and obstructing justice, and two other employees are set to do the same very soon in the wake of a 14-year-old girl’s death, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. The guilty pleas come as part of an agreement where all three will testify against the agency, which tried to cover up the death in 2006. The organization had been paid upward of $3.7 million by the city to take care of patients like Danieal Kelly.

Christina Nimpson, Manuelita Buenaflor and Sotheary Chan all worked for MultiEthnic Behavioral Health when Kelly, a cerebral palsy patient, died of starvation in a hot apartment in Philadelphia while under the care of the agency. While none of the three employees were specifically assigned to take care of Kelly, the Philadelphia Inquirer reports, all three participated in covering up various failures on the agency’s part. Buenaflor, for example, a supervisor, created documentation of visits that never occurred, erased documentation of lack of oversight and backdated various records. Nimpson, according to her plea agreement, “frequently did not make the required visits to the families assigned to her.”

The girl’s mother, Andrea Kelly, was also charged in her daughter’s death. She pleaded guilty to third-degree murder in April, and was sentenced to between 20 and 40 years in prison. Case worker Julius Juma Murray and MultiEthnic head Mickal Kamuvaka also face involuntary manslaughter charges in the case.

OUTRAGE! PARENTS of DANIEAL KELLY SUING CITY and DHS for NOT PREVENTING THEIR DAUGHTER’S DEATH!

Andrea Kelly Starved Her 14-year-old Daughter to Death, Blames DHS and City!

Patricia Sicilia
Aug 13, 2008

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/953489/outrage_parents_of_danieal_kelly_suing.html?cat=17

In a stunning display of hubris, the parents of Danieal Kelly, the 14-year-old girl with cerebral palsy who was neglected and starved to death by her mother, are suing the City of Philadelphia and its Department of Human Services (“DHS”) for not preventing their daughter’s death!

In my previous article on this subject, I recounted how her emaciated, bedsore ridden, maggot infested body was found by rescue workers on August 4, 2006. At last count, nine people have been indicted for charges ranging from murder, manslaughter, endangering the welfare of children, involuntary manslaughter and reckless endangerment to forgery, tampering with public records, conspiracy and perjury. Those charged include the parents, DHS workers, staffers at an outsourced agency hired to check on Danieal, and three of Andrea Kelly’s friends. Seven others have been fired and/or suspended from their jobs at DHS, pending posible charges, and the head of the city’s health department has resigned.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported today that, the day after the parents were charged in her murder, Eric Zajac and Brian Mildenberg, attorneys for Andrea and Daniel Kelly, filed a complaint charging the City, DHS, the Commonwealth and several caseworkers with failing to protect Danieal, and want them to compensate the family for its loss. The suit blames Danieal Kelly’s death on caseworkers for DHS and MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., a firm the city hired to provide support to the family. The suit states that the parents and siblings of Danieal were deprived of her “love, tutelage, companionship, support, comfort and consortium” as well as the “economic value of her life expectancy,” and seeks unspecified damages, as well as reimbursement for medical bills, funeral and burial expenses, and attorneys’ fees!

This mother kept her daughter in a dirty, airless room on a mattress on the floor, didn’t feed her or give her water, take her to school or the doctor, and didn’t even clean up the girl’s waste, knocking it onto the floor and letting it dry there for rescue workers to step on when they found her body!

After criticism that the Kellys were attempting to profit from their daughter’s death, their names were removed from the suit, and any proceeds would go to her nine brothers and sisters who are now in foster care.

District Attorney Lynn Abraham was outraged. “”The nerve, the gall,” she said yesterday. “This is such a perversion of what parents are supposed to be.”

However, this suit opens the Kellys up to questioning under oath — a prospect that has the DA chomping at the bit. “I would like to depose her right away,” Abraham said, “I could cross-examine her myself for two weeks.

The Inquirer reports that lawyers for the City and Commonwealth stated that: “Daniel and Andrea Kelly have inverted the maxim in which a child kills his parents and throws himself on the mercy of the court, claiming that he is an orphan.” In an interview, Chief Deputy Attorney General Barry N. Kramer, who represents the State Department of Public Welfare which oversees DHS stated, “It’s the definition of chutzpah.”

City and Commonwealth lawyers have filed papers calling the suit meritless and moved for dismissal, saying the child’s death was the result of “parental neglect.”

Just unbelievable! This makes me so glad I don’t work for lawyers anymore!

Danieal Kelly’s parents sue DHS – Philadelphia News

by David Henry & Dann Cuellar

http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=6322915

CENTER CITY – August 12, 2008 (WPVI) – Danieal Kelly’s parents have filed a wrongful death suit.

It is a document that has outraged the mayor and district attorney, who can’t believe Danieal’s parents had the nerve to sue the city, and that they were able to find a lawyer willing to take their case.

“I have never heard of anything so crazy in my life,” Mayor Michael Nutter said.

The lawsuit seeks monetary damages from the city because 14-year-old Danieal Kelly was under DHS supervision at the time of her death two years ago.

Danieal lived with her mother and nine brothers and sisters in a vermin infested row home.

She had cerebral palsy and couldn’t fend for herself.

She weighed just 42 pounds and had a mass of open bedsores when she died.

Daniel’s last word was “water.”

“The parents, essentially, murdered their daughter and then turn around and sue us,” Mayor Nutter said.

Danieal’s mother Andrea Kelly is charged with murder.

Her father, Daniel Kelly, who didn’t live in the house, is charged with endangering her welfare.

They filed the lawsuit against the city the day after they were arrested.

The district attorney can’t believe any lawyer would take the case.

“I think this lessens the reputations of attorneys in general and doesn’t do anything to them either; in my judgment, they look terrible as attorneys and professionals,” D.A. Lynne Abraham The lawyers who filed the suit are Brian Mildenberg and Eric Zajac.

Action News tried to get responses from both lawyers.

At the home of lawyer Eric Zajac, who’s also an elected member of the Radnor Township school board, there was no direct response to the D.A.’s explosive statements.

Zajac did refer Action News to a written statement saying they have filed legal petitions to have a trustee represent the estate in light of the charges against Danieal’s parents. The statement says “if Danieal’s parents are convicted, the proceeds would go to her brothers and sisters.”

Abraham says the lawyers are only interested in what she calls, a fat payday for themselves.

“The other children are going to be well taken care of for the state and these lawyers are not suing for them, they’re suing for themselves,” Mayor Nutter said.

Brian Mildenberg responded to the case on Action News at 11: “It’s just outrageous, it is outrageous. We are suing on behalf of Danieal Kelly. Her estate is suing. Her parents are not suing. There are legal beneficiaries to the estate that will be determined by Pennsylvania law by a judge in the orphan’s court. We have no part in determining who the legal beneficiaries are and I’d like to make another comment because Lynne Abraham and Mayor Nutter stated that the remaining children would be taken care of by the state. Well, I hope they’re taking care of better than the state took care of Danieal Kelly.”

The lawsuit says Danieal suffered “unbearable conscious pain and suffering, mental anguish and physical and mental injuries.”

It also says Danieal’s parents have been deprived of, among other things, her love and companionship.

The D.A. wonders where was the love when Danieal was dying of starvation.

 Mayor Nutter says the city will eventually seek reimbursement for whatever money it spends defending itself against the lawsuit.

Nutter forcefully announces DHS shakeup – Philadelphia news

David Henry 

PHILADELPHIA – August 4, 2008 (WPVI) – An emotional Mayor Nutter used strong language to announce more shakeups at the Department of Human Services after criminal charges were filed against DHS workers last week.

“I am fully, thoroughly, and completely pissed off about what has happened here. Behaviors exhibited by public employees is unacceptable and I am furious at their actions. When I think of my own daughter, and if she were in someone else’s care, and they performed the way some of these individuals did, I would kick their ass myself,” Mayor Michael Nutter said during a Monday morning news conference.

You can watch the entire news conference held by Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter by CLICKING HERE.

The District Attorney filed criminal charges last week against nine people, including DHS caseworkers Dana Poindexter and Laura Sommerer.

They are charged in connection with the death of 14 year old Danieal Kelly.

The girl suffered from cerebral palsy and was allowed to rot to death in her bed.

The grand jury report was critical of seven other DHS workers, mostly administrators and supervisors, but they were not charged.

Today they were suspended, pending further action.

Nutter has ordered a thorough internal investigation of how the Kelly case was handled.

“It is possible that further suspensions and personnel actions will be made as a result of these investigations,” the mayor said.

The fallout over the Kelly case began two years ago.

The DHS Commissioner at the time, Cheryl Ransom-Garner, was fired by Mayor Street.

Carmen Paris was acting health commissioner at the time of Danieal’s death.

This weekend she resigned her current post as an assistant health commissioner.

The grand jury report accused her of interfering with the investigation.

Back in 2006, Mayor Street appointed an oversight committee.

It made a number of recommendations that were presented to Mayor Nutter in January.

He says many of the reforms are being acted on and that the DHS of 2008 is vastly improved.

A leading child welfare advocate disagrees.

Richard Gelles is dean of the School of Social Policy and Practice at the University of Pennsylvania.

He testified before the grand jury.

Gelles says DHS continues to lurch from crisis to crisis with no adequate oversight.

Mayor Nutter says he has full confidence in new DHS commissioner Anne Marie Ambrose and health commissioner Donald Schwarz.

Mayor Nutter will be issuing new marching orders during two meetings tomorrow with the entire DHS staff. He wants the dedicated workers to know they’re appreciated, but will be telling the slackers their days are numbered.

The Death of Danieal Kelly: Philadelphia’s Shame

Despite Reports that Danieal Kelly, Who Suffered from Cerebral Palsy, was Being Abused and Not Cared for Properly, Philadelphia’s DHS Failed to Take Action

Patricia Sicilia
Aug 4, 2008 
Danieal Kelly, the third of Andrea Kelly’s nine children by five fathers, was 14-years-old when her curled, 42-pound body, starved body was found on August 4, 2006. Police and paramedics were called to Danieal’s West Philadelphia home and when they opened her bedroom door, the stench of decay hit them. Danieal, who had been dead for several hours, was on a dirty mattress surrounded by feces. Maggot-infested bedsores covered her back. She had been on the mattress for such a long time, the shape of her body was imprinted into the mattress. A grand jury report was released this week, indicting nine people and describing Danieal’s life of pain, neglect, abuse and eventual death.

Danieal Kelly suffered from cerebral palsy and, according to a grand jury report, her mother was said to be “embarrassed by her disabled daughter, didn’t want to touch her, take her out in public, change her diapers or make sure she had enough fluids.” According to a grand jury report, Andrea Kelly’s family and friends constantly confronted her about Danieal’s deteriorating condition, but while she would promise to get help for her, she failed to do so, and eventually banished the concerned relatives from her home. While Danieal’s condidtion worsened, Andrea Kelly was said to have entertained, attended classes and tended to her other children. Danieal was not enrolled in school or given medical attention. The report stated that Andrea Kelly “rebuffed one of her sons when he begged her several times to call 911 to get help for Danieal in her final days.”

The house where Andrea Kelly lived with her nine children was in squalor, with mattresses on the floor. Kelly’s other children are now in foster care, including the baby she gave birth to the fall after Danieal’s death, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.

According to reports, Daniel Kelly, long separated from Andrea Kelly, had custody of Danieal and her brother Daniel in 1995, when he moved to Arizona and lived with a girlfriend who cared for the girl. Those years are documented with photographs of her riding a pony, at a party at a bowling alley, and smiling with classmates in her special needs class. When Daniel Kelly broke up with his girlfriend in 2001, the girl was withdrawn from school. In 2003, he returned to Philadelphia and asked his estranged wife and her other children to move in with him. Soon after, he moved out, abandoning Danieal to Andrea Kelly’s care.

Danieal was supposed to be under the supervision of Philadelphia’s Department of Human Services (“DHS”), but a grand jury investigation has uncovered gross negligence in this girl’s care. A 258-page grand jury report documented that neither DHS nor the now defunct, non-profit agency MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc., which was out-sourced to follow Danieal’s case, had even seen the girl or properly reported on her care during their tenure. Neighbors contacted DHS numerous times reporting that Danieal was in danger, but those complaints were ignored. Anthony Miller, the father of some of Andrea Kelly’s children, called the DHS hotline on April 20, 2005. The grand jury states: “Mr. Miller said he was moved to make the report to DHS because ‘I seen Danieal Kelly upstairs in a hot room laying in pee, no curtains, no blinds, no fans, just laying in pee.’” Mr. Miller said no one from DHS ever contacted him.

Nine people have been indicted in her death: her mother, charged with murder, and her father, charged with endangering the welfare of children. In addition, four social workers, suspected of falsifying home visits and progress reports, have been charged with crimes including involuntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment, forgery, tampering with public records, conspiracy, endangering the welfare of children. Three of Andrea Kelly’s friends were charged with perjury for lying to the grand jury about the girl’s condition before her death.

The Philadelphia Inquirer this week reported that Assistant Health Commissioner Carmen Paris resigned the day after the release of the grand jury report. Paris was acting health commissioner and oversaw the Medical Examiner’s Office in August of 2006 when Danieal was found dead. Paris allegedly tried to cover up the details of Danieal’s death and told the doctor who performed Danieal’s autopsy and a supervisor in the Medical Examiner’s Office “not to speak to anybody,” not even homicide detectives, about the case. While Paris has not yet been charged with a crime, District Attorney Lynne Abraham said charges could not be ruled out.

Danieal’s case was brought to the public’s attention in late 2006 when the Philadelphia Inquirer published a series of articles focusing attention on the failings of DHS, particularly on the case of Danieal Kelly, and over 20 other children who died while they or their families were supposed to be under the supervision of DHS.

Top Aide Quits in DHS Fallout Carmen Paris, acting health chief at the time of Danieal Kelly’s death, came under heavy criticism.

http://articles.philly.com/2008-08-02/news/25258808_1_grand-jury-report-danieal-kelly-starvation-death

August 02, 2008|By Jennifer Lin, Dwight Ott and John Sullivan INQUIRER STAFF WRITERS

Philadelphia’s former top health official resigned yesterday amid allegations that she interfered with an investigation of the starvation death of 14-year-old Danieal Kelly.

Carmen Paris, 51, was acting health commissioner at the time of the teen’s death. A 28-year city employee who most recently was paid $110,845 as an assistant health commissioner, Paris resigned one day after being suspended and escorted from her office.

Health Commissioner Donald Schwarz, a deputy mayor, said in an interview that he was able to confirm on his own what he read about Paris in a scorching grand jury report released Thursday.

“I’m a pediatrician, and I was incredibly sad and pretty determined that the information in that report makes a difference in the lives of children in Philadelphia going forward,” Schwarz said.

The grand jury report accuses the Department of Human Services of gross negligence in the death of Danieal Kelly and charges nine people, including her parents. Paris was not charged, but was singled out for criticism for telling the medical examiner to keep quiet about the case.

Calls to Paris yesterday were not returned.

Yesterday’s development came nearly two years after The Inquirer published investigative articles that detailed the deaths of children under DHS supervision. After the reports appeared, then-Mayor John F. Street appointed a blue-ribbon panel to overhaul the agency.

Yesterday, DHS Commissioner Anne Marie Ambrose said the department was finalizing plans on how to conduct an investigation into the roles of other employees named in the report but not charged.

“This is a top-to-bottom look at what needs to change,” Ambrose said in an interview.

She said she was prepared to make those plans public on Monday and that they would involve an extensive investigation. As of yesterday, no one else had been suspended, she said.

Danieal Kelly, who had cerebral palsy, starved to death in full view of her family, DHS social workers and employees for an outside contractor, MultiEthnic Behavioral Health Inc.

Of the nine defendants – including two DHS social workers, Laura Sommerer, 33, and Dana Poindexter, 51; two employees for a contractor; and three friends of the mother – only one remained at large yesterday.

A warrant is out for the arrest of Diamond Brantley, 22, a family friend, who is accused of lying before the grand jury.

Six defendants were arraigned, with bail of $50,000 to $200,000 set for all except the victim’s mother, Andrea Kelly, 39, who is charged with murder. The mother of nine other children, she faces a maximum sentence of life in prison.

Two employees for MultiEthnic – caseworker Julius Murray, 51, and director and co-owner Mickal Kamuvaka, 59 – face manslaughter charges, which carry a maximum sentence of five years.

The victim’s father, Daniel Kelly, 37, was charged with endangering the welfare of a child. He was released yesterday on $50,000 bail.

On Aug. 4, 2006, paramedics found her emaciated body, covered with bedsores, maggots and flies, in a fetid, hot bedroom in a West Philadelphia rowhouse.

The criminal charges have left workers at DHS reeling, with some proposing that they walk off the job in protest – an idea that was squelched yesterday by union officials.

To do so would have brought the department back to the depths of despair it felt in October 2006, after Street fired the top two officials and hundreds of workers walked off the job in protest. The firings came days after The Inquirer exposed the deaths of more than 20 children whose families were known to the agency.

The series led to investigations by the District Attorney’s Office as well as by federal authorities.

According to research by city prosecutors, Philadelphia taxpayers have spent $321,167.80 so far on outside law firms to represent DHS employees in grand jury proceedings.

Kahim Boles, an official for the union that represents DHS rank-and-file workers, said there is a disciplinary process at the agency.

“They should not be going to jail for the work they do,” said Boles, president of District Council 47, Local 2187, of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.

He said he was also troubled that only lower-level social workers were charged in the case and not supervisors.

“My members should not be the only people on the chopping block,” Boles said. “They don’t do their jobs in a vacuum. This goes all the way up the chain. They were all supervised by a supervisor, who was supervised by an administrator, who was supervised by a director.”

Rita Urwitz, a vice president of the AFSCME unit that represents DHS supervisors, District Council 47, Local 2186, took issue with the grand jury report, saying it was based on a case that, although tragic, is now two years old.

“This case traumatized the agency when it came out two years ago, and it has been very alive since then,” she said. “Not to diminish the case, but the [district attorney's] report is using testimony about a time that isn’t today.”

Preliminary hearings for the defendants are scheduled on Aug. 11.

The highest bail – $200,000 – was set for Kamuvaka, a native of Namibia who was also ordered to surrender her passport.

A family friend, Andrea Miles, 18, was charged with perjury and was being processed as a juvenile because she was a minor at the time of the incidents. Another friend, Marie Moses, 34, was also charged with perjury.

Starved, disabled girl was failed at every turn

For days before Danieal Kelly died in a fetid, airless room – made stifling hot by a midsummer heat wave – the bedridden teenager begged for something to drink until she could muster only one word: water.

Unable to help herself because of her cerebral palsy, she wasted away from malnutrition and maggot-infested bedsores that ate her flesh. She died alone on a putrid mattress in her mother’s home, the floor covered in feces. She was 14 but weighed just 19.05 kg.

The nightmare of forced starvation and infection that killed Danieal while she was under the protection of the city’s human services agency is documented in a 258-page grand jury report released this week that charges nine people – her parents, four social workers and three family friends – in her ghastly death.

The report describes a mother, Andrea Kelly, who was embarrassed by her disabled daughter and didn’t want to touch her, take her out in public, change her nappies or make sure she had enough fluids. It portrays Daniel Kelly, the father who once had custody of Danieal, as having no interest in raising her.

And it accuses the city Department of Human Services of being “uncaring and incompetent.”

“It was this indifference that helped kill Danieal Kelly,” an angry District Attorney Lynne Abraham said. “How is it possible for this to have happened?”

The report should “outrage the entire Philadelphia community” and bring about “earth-shattering, cataclysmic changes” at the Department of Human Services, Abraham said.

Andrea Kelly, 39, the only defendant charged with murder, was ordered held today without bail. The social workers – suspected of falsifying home visits and progress reports in the case – face charges ranging from child endangerment to involuntary manslaughter. The family friends are accused of lying to the grand jury about the girl’s condition before her death.

None of the lawyers for any of the defendants had any immediate comment.

Human Services commissioner Anne Marie Ambrose, in office only a month, said yesterday that she is intent on improving child safety and worker accountability in an agency that has repeatedly been accused of failing to protect children.

Late today, the city announced the resignation of Assistant Health Commissioner Carmen Paris. The grand jury had accused Paris of interfering in the investigation of the girl’s death while she was acting health commissioner, but found insufficient evidence to charge her with obstruction of justice.

The report on Danieal’s death in August 2006 documents a downward spiral from the early years that she spent in Arizona with her father and his girlfriend.

Though Danieal attended special-needs classes only sporadically, a school report described her as an active learner and “one of the sweetest students ever enrolled in this program.” But allegations of parental neglect soon surfaced, and following Daniel Kelly’s breakup with his girlfriend in 2001, Danieal never again attended school.

Daniel Kelly and his children moved to Philadelphia in 2003. He eventually asked his estranged wife to move in, even though she had several other children and he knew she was incapable of caring for Danieal, authorities say. He then moved out.

“Daniel Kelly was well aware what deserting his daughter meant to her safety and welfare,” the grand jury report said. “He just did not care.”

The Department of Human Services received at least five reports of Danieal being mistreated between 2003 and 2005. All described a “helpless child sitting unattended, unkempt and unwashed, in a small stroller in her own urine and feces,” her screams ignored by her mother, the grand jury report said. The stroller, which served as a wheelchair, apparently never left the house.

Agency employee Dana Poindexter, assigned to investigate, also ignored Danieal, authorities say. Already having been suspended after a 3-week-old baby died on his watch in 2002, Poindexter continued his “slovenly, neglectful and dangerously reckless work habits” after being assigned the Kelly case, the grand jury said. He did not file a single report, authorities said.

The Kellys finally were assigned help from a private agency in 2005. Employee Julius Murray was required to visit the family twice a week, but authorities believe he may have come to the house only once – to have Andrea Kelly sign predated forms attesting to future visits.

The grand jury report said Laura Sommerer, a city social worker, failed to hold the now-defunct company accountable when, months later, Danieal still was not enrolled in school or receiving medical care.

And after Danieal died, authorities say, company director Mickal Kamuvaka held a “forgery fest” in her office where she had employees “concoct almost a year’s worth of false progress reports.”

But authorities say Andrea Kelly, whose other children are now in foster care, is primarily responsible for her daughter’s death.

The report said she was confronted repeatedly by her own mother, uncle, friends and even two of her sons about Danieal’s deteriorating health. She would lie or put them off by saying she would seek help, or banish them from the house, authorities say.

In the meantime, the report said, she entertained friends, attended classes and fed her other children.

“This behaviour indicates that Andrea Kelly did not merely allow Danieal to die,” the report said. “She may have even wanted her disabled daughter to die.”

When an ambulance responded to an emergency phone call for Danieal on Aug. 4, 2006, the girl had been dead for several hours. Authorities said she was so emaciated she looked like the victim of a concentration camp.

She had been lying on the filthy mattress for so long that her body outline was imprinted on it.

9 charged in death of neglected, disabled Pa. teen

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-07-31-pa_N.htm

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Four social workers were among nine people charged Thursday in the death of a disabled 14-year-old girl who authorities say wasted away from neglect before dying at 42 pounds.

Danieal Kelly’s mother was charged with murder; counts against other defendants range from involuntary manslaughter to perjury. District Attorney Lynne Abraham said any of the nine could have foreseen the horrific fate of Danieal, whose emaciated body was found in her mother’s squalid house covered with bone-deep, maggot-infested bedsores in August 2006.

Abraham had scathing words for the city’s Department of Human Services, calling its handling of the case “callous, indifferent, unconscionable” — and all too familiar.

“Danieal did not fall through the cracks,” she said. “It was a failure of institutional inclination. Saving Danieal was just too much trouble.”

Two of the social workers are city employees; two others worked for a company hired by DHS. Department Commissioner Anne Marie Ambrose scheduled an afternoon news conference to discuss the case.

Warrants were issued for all nine defendants Thursday. Andrea Kelly, the mother of Danieal (pronounced “Danielle”), was charged with murder, and father Daniel Kelly, who did not live with the family, was charged with child endangerment.

A 258-page grand jury report recommending the charges said not only that Andrea Kelly refused to get her daughter food, water and medical treatment, but that she repeatedly prevented one of her other children from calling an ambulance “for his obviously dying sister.”

A listing for Andrea Kelly’s attorney, Vincent Giusini, rang unanswered Thursday. It was not immediately clear if Daniel Kelly had an attorney.

Two employees of MultiEthnic Behavioral Health, a now-defunct company that DHS hired to provide social services to Danieal, falsified documents to cover up the fact they rarely, if ever, checked on her, the grand jury said.

Julius Murray and Mickal Kamuvaka were charged with involuntary manslaughter and tampering with public records.

An e-mail sent to Kamuvaka was not immediately returned. Contact information for Murray could not immediately be located.

Murray’s “fraudulent nonperformance of a job” — he seldom went to the Kelly house, which he was supposed to visit twice a week — allowed Andrea Kelly to starve her daughter over a period of months, the grand jury said.

After Danieal’s death, Kamuvaka directed Murray to fabricate and backdate reports on the family, grand jurors said.

DHS social worker Dana Poindexter was charged with child endangerment for what the grand jury said were his “less than meager” efforts to look into several reports over three years that Danieal, who had cerebral palsy, was not receiving medical care, social services or schooling.

“He did not complete a single investigation or risk assessment,” the report said. “Indeed, his file on the family was buried at the bottom of a filing-cabinet-sized box, beneath food wrappers and unopened envelopes relating to other children’s cases.”

A message left for Poindexter’s attorney was not immediately returned Thursday.

Another DHS employee, Laura Sommerer, faces a child endangerment charge. As Danieal’s social worker for 10 months, she didn’t notice Danieal’s deterioration, even after a visit June 29, 2006 — about five weeks before the teen died.

“The children appeared safe and comfortable in the home,” Sommerer wrote in a report, according to grand jurors.

Sommerer’s attorney, Lisa Dykstra, declined to comment Thursday.

Also charged were Andrea Miles, Marie Moses and Diamond Brantley, all of Philadelphia, who were friends with Andrea Kelly. The report accuses them of perjury for telling grand jurors that Danieal had been fine on Aug. 3, 2006, the day before her festering corpse was taken from the house.

It was not immediately clear if they had attorneys.

The report should “outrage the entire Philadelphia community” and bring about “earth-shattering, cataclysmic changes” at the Department of Human Services, Abraham said.

Abraham said that although at least 55 children have died under the agency’s watch, it has given only “lip service to halfhearted corrective action.”

“You can’t continue to bury these children and say things are getting better when they’re not,” she said.

Report shows how DHS failed

The remedy: A new dedication to children—and oversight.

By John Sullivan and Craig R. McCoy

Inquirer Staff Writers

Posted: Thu, Jan. 24, 2008, 7:55 PM

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/special_packages/inquirer/child_welfare/20070601_Report_shows_how_DHS_failed.html?viewAll=y

 Children have died needlessly because of “significant system failures” that plague the city Department of Human Services, a panel of experts said in a wrenching report made public today.The agency has been adrift for years, confused about its mission and resistant to change. As a result, it “fails to protect some of Philadelphia’s most vulnerable children,” the panel said in a much-anticipated review of the $600 million-a-year department.Appointed by Mayor Street after articles in The Inquirer raised question about DHS, the panel said the agency had to make sweeping changes or children would remain “at risk of continued abuse and neglect.”The panel scrutinized 52 children whose families were known to DHS who died from 2001 through 2006 – and found that 27 died of abuse or in suspicious circumstances. A dozen others died needlessly in unsafe “co-sleeping” episodes, panelists said.

“There were preventable deaths,” said panelist Cindy W. Christian, a pediatrician who heads the child-abuse unit at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

To overhaul the agency, the panel recommended a series of reforms ranging from a rethinking of its core mission to the development of new investigative tools. Among other steps, it said the agency must:

Visit all children under 5 within two hours of receiving a warning that they might be abused or neglected. Currently, the agency takes up to five days to conduct many such visits.

Require social workers to use a common set of guidelines to evaluate whether children are in danger. Before the scandal broke, DHS had no such common standard, leading it to render important decisions about families randomly and capriciously.

Monitor more closely the outside contractors who handle most of the face-to-face contacts with children, parents and guardians. The agency should issue public report cards grading their performance, the panel said.

The panel said the mayor must appoint a permanent oversight commission to keep watch on DHS.

“This is urgent and doable,” said panel co-chair Carol Wilson Spigner of the School of Social Policy and Practice at the University of Pennsylvania. Acting DHS Commissioner Arthur C. Evans Jr., who took over after Street forced out the previous commissioner, said the agency had already implemented some of the changes and would phase in the rest.

“DHS is embracing all of the recommended reforms,” Evans said.

Street, through a spokesman, commended the work of the unpaid panel but said a detailed response would come later. “The report is a road map to lasting reform and we welcome it,” spokesman Joe Grace said.

Michael Nutter, the Democratic nominee for mayor, said last night that, if elected, he would use the report as “a blueprint for change.”

Nutter added: “DHS must be fixed on behalf of the children of Philadelphia.”

Al Taubenberger, the Republican candidate, said he found the report powerful and convincing.

“It’s unconscionable that children are dying on the watch of the city and this agency,” Taubenberger said.

The panel suggested that DHS’ problems lie in a lack of leadership, not a lack of money.

As the report noted, “DHS is better financed and resourced than most, if not all, [agencies in] other major cities.”

Nor is the problem a lack of outside scrutiny. The agency’s pervasive problems have been documented in more than 20 lawsuits and reviews over the last two decades.

“Throughout the reports, there were themes that persist and remain unresolved today,” the panel wrote.

Said Spigner: “What we found was, the system does not know how to turn itself around.”

One key issue, the panel found, was that the agency had become the angel of last resort for the city’s most desperate residents, forcing social workers to try to solve an array of problems brought on by poverty.

The report said the agency long ago lost sight of its core mission: protecting children.

Again and again, the panel noted how random the decision-making had become within DHS.

To end that, the agency has already developed a new “safety-assessment tool” to guide all social workers in their contacts with clients.

The tool instructs DHS staff to focus on such issues as drug abuse, alcohol abuse and domestic violence – rather than, say, the cleanliness of a home.

Without guidelines, the panel found, social workers responded differently to the same set of problems in a family.

In particular, this “wide, wide variation in response” was noticeable in the case of children who died, said panel member Carol E. Tracy, executive director of the Women’s Law Center in Philadelphia.

The panel said the agency had also been hamstrung by its allegiance to state recommendations about how to classify clients.

Following those state rules, the agency has been responding quickly to cases in which children were allegedly being abused or sexually assaulted. But it responded much more slowly to warnings about possible neglect.

“Children die from neglect. They didn’t just die from physical abuse and sexual assault,” said Spigner. “So it’s a false dichotomy.”

At the panel’s urging, DHS had already begun responding with the same speed to all complaints involving younger children, regardless of their nature.

To underscore the new philosophy, Evans said, he has told his people, with a bit of hyperbole: “If we get a call saying, ‘The hair isn’t combed right,’ we go out and see the kid.”

The panel also called on DHS to do a better job of analyzing its performance and become more open with the public.

The department had piles of data in expensive computer systems, but made almost no effort to analyze it, the panel found.

“It’s all there, but it never really comes together,” said Evans.

He has been more transparent about the agency’s inner workings since taking the post in October.

To turn around the agency, Evans will have to rely on the existing cadre of DHS managers, many of whom have been promoted over the years from social worker positions to management jobs without proper training, the panel said.

“Managing requires a different set of skills, and there has not been an investment to help people acquire them,” said Spigner. “There are people in key positions who don’t know how to manage.”

Rita Urwitz, head of the DHS supervisors’ union, said she did not quarrel with the need for more management training.

“There has been for many, many years a problem with the infrastructure and zero training for staff and no real plan to fix it,” Urwitz said.

Estelle B. Richman, who once was the senior child-welfare official in Philadelphia and now heads the state’s Department of Public Welfare, said the report was a powerful critique of DHS.

“Unfortunately, the report is also a reminder that we’ve gone though this before,” she said. “The challenge for me and everyone else is to never have to go through another report like this again.”

Inquirer Investigation: ‘Bury Your Mistakes’

By Ken Dilanian and John Sullivan

Inquirer Staff Writers

Posted: Tue, Jun. 12, 2007, 11:57 AM

In September, five months shy of her second birthday, Alayiah Turman was pummeled to death after she interrupted a video game.

 Marrieon Currie, 11 weeks old in January, took his final breaths as he was being doused in hot water, thrown down stairs, and beaten with a mop handle.

Bryanna Redmond, a skinny 2-year-old known as “Princess,” died last year from a punch that split her spine.

Before they were killed – each by a parent, police say – all three children had come under the scrutiny of the city’s child-protection agency, the Department of Human Services, which has the power to remove children from abusive homes. In each case, relatives or neighbors say they saw signs of danger. DHS either never saw those signs or discounted them.

Three years after a string of blunders by DHS were widely blamed for failing to prevent the torture-murder of toddler Porchia Bennett, an Inquirer investigation has found that young children are still regularly abused to death after coming to the attention of DHS. Although 3-year-old Porchia’s death prompted the department to solicit expert advice on how to improve its investigative procedures, agency officials have failed to act on most of those recommendations.

From 2003 through 2005, at least 20 children died of abuse or neglect after coming to the attention of DHS, including 10 just last year, according to department records. Those numbers were coaxed out of the agency after four weeks of repeated requests.

In recent interviews, DHS Commissioner Cheryl Ransom-Garner acknowledged that the agency had made mistakes, but she declined to discuss them, citing confidentiality rules.

I think DHS is doing a great job,” she said. “Our staff do a heroic job every day, working to save Philadelphia’s children. One child death is too many. And from every death we do a review to determine what can we do differently.”

Those reviews, however, are secret.

“In Philadelphia, you can bury your mistakes,” said Richard Gelles, dean of the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Social Work.

Ransom-Garner declined to discuss details, but said DHS reviews had found that no policies or procedures were violated in six of the eight cases The Inquirer examined. In two of the cases, DHS could not answer the question by the time this article went to print.

There always will be deaths that child-protection authorities could not have foreseen or prevented. And the agency is in much better shape than two decades ago, when a class-action lawsuit forced it to improve.

But experts who consulted for DHS in recent years told The Inquirer that the agency’s system for evaluating risk is inadequate. They said the agency still had not addressed key failings uncovered after Porchia Bennett’s death.

“Their investigators are not being given a policy for how to make decisions or an understanding of what risks can be tolerated,” said Gelles, a former DHS consultant who became so disillusioned that he now serves as an expert witness for lawyers suing the agency.

Mayor Street, walking into City Hall yesterday to attend a chess lecture, declined to answer questions about the performance of his human-services department.

“I don’t have any comment,” he said. “I don’t have any comment on that at this time.”

In the three cases with the most extensive public records about the department’s actions, an Inquirer review of court documents and interviews with relatives and neighbors found that people had concerns about the children’s welfare before they died – red flags that could have been apparent to inquiring caseworkers.

Five other cases, where there is less public information about DHS actions, raise questions about whether the agency could have done more to prevent the deaths. The Inquirer examined only cases in which the agency’s involvement could be determined from other sources, because DHS would not disclose which of the dead children it had checked on.

The Inquirer found:

In the Bryanna Redmond punching death, the toddler was killed after the agency closed a case involving her mentally disabled mother, who had talked of abandoning the baby at birth. A grandmother testified in court that she had asked DHS for help, to no avail.

Marrieon Currie’s mother, Lea, who had a history of mental and physical problems, told neighbors that she was hearing demons. DHS had been providing her services and left the infant in her custody. But neighbors, who tried to help with the baby, told The Inquirer that she was incapable of caring even for her dog.

When Alayiah Turman was beaten to death last month, DHS had been investigating an abuse allegation. The agency said it had not detected any injury; Alayiah’s grandmother said she had seen bruises on the child, and the medical examiner found a healed arm fracture during the autopsy.

A video game unplugged

Police say Alayiah’s father, Tyrone Spellman, confessed to killing his daughter after she pulled the plug while he was playing Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon, a violent combat video game.

Ransom-Garner told The Inquirer on Sept. 13 – before the newspaper launched its inquiry into child deaths – that the agency had been investigating the family.

A few weeks before Alayiah was killed, the commissioner said, an anonymous caller reported that an adult was yelling at a 2-year-old, and that there were holes in the floor of the home. The next day, she said, a caseworker interviewed Alayiah’s mother, Mia Turman, and inspected the child. There were no bruises, Ransom-Garner said, and the toddler appeared happy and playful. She said there had been no other complaints.

The agency made another surprise visit a few days later. The caseworker asked Turman whether anyone else lived in the house, in order to perform a background check on each adult. The caseworker took Turman’s word that no men lived there, Ransom-Garner said.

Neighbors and relatives told The Inquirer, however, that Spellman had been born at the Brewerytown rowhouse where Alayiah was killed. He was living there with his brother and another relative, Keith Walker.

Turman had moved to Spellman’s house only recently, said neighbors, many of whom say he is innocent.

Walker told The Inquirer that he had tried to revive the little girl when he arrived home that night. Detectives later told him that there were obvious signs of past abuse, he said. Alayiah’s grandmother Marvine Turman told The Inquirer that she remembered seeing bruises.

Asked about that, Ransom-Garner said she could not discuss the case, even though she had talked about it previously.

Asked whether caseworkers were instructed to interview neighbors during their investigations, she said that they were not prohibited from doing so, but that there were no specific guidelines about it.

A shattering death

Alayiah died three years after a killing that was supposed to change the culture at the Department of Human Services.

In August 2003, 3-year-old Porchia Bennett died after enduring months of abuse at the hands of a couple her mother paid to care for her. DHS acknowledged it erred in the case.

First it lost track of the family before Porchia was born, even though the agency had not resolved a previous abuse investigation.

Then, three days before she died, a DHS worker failed to investigate an abuse report at her house.

In the aftermath, DHS did make some changes. It overhauled the way caseworkers search for families, authorizing the use of databases and private investigators.

So why are children in its system still dying?

One answer, experts say, is that while the agency fixed its tracking system, it failed to adopt proposals for significant changes in how it investigates abuse and weighs risk to children.

As a result, the agency still depends on the judgment of individual caseworkers – some of whom are incompetent, according to DHS critic Gelles.

After the Bennett case, then-Commissioner Alba Martinez hired several consultants to examine and overhaul the agency’s risk-assessment procedures.

DHS officials said Friday that they might implement some of the recommendations.

“This is a work in progress,” Deputy Commissioner John McGee said.

Ransom-Garner said the agency was working to improve its systems on its own timetable, consistent with state regulations. She also argued that the Bennett case did not point to profound problems in how DHS operated.

“What happened to Porchia Bennett, we looked at that case and said, ‘Lessons learned, what do we need to do here?’ ” she said. “The system was not broke.”

Losing sleep

Ransom-Garner’s predecessor, Martinez, struck a different tone when she hired a Penn team led by Gelles, a nationally recognized child-welfare expert, and Carol Wilson Spigner, a child-welfare official in the Clinton administration.

“This was Alba’s project, because she wanted to prevent another Porchia Bennett,” Gelles said. “She lost a lot of sleep over it.”

Gelles said the DHS policy manual “said you should do this you should do that, but it gave almost no guidance as to how.”

That policy manual on investigations is still in place.

Gelles now believes the best way to change the agency is to fight it, he said.

“I said to Cheryl, ‘You can do this the easy way or the hard way: You can change, or I’m going to sue you.’ They’ve chosen to do it the hard way,” Gelles said.

In May, the Penn team handed over two major recommendations: a new policy on investigating child fatalities, and a new policy on assessing the safety of a child in a home.

The city has not adopted them.

John Goad, former deputy director of the Division of Child Protection at the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, had a similar experience.

He had helped engineer a turnaround in Chicago’s system, where, he said, reports of repeat child abuse fell by half. Martinez hired him to evaluate her agency.

Goad said DHS workers had a difficult time deciding how to handle cases and sometimes made the wrong decisions.

“Their decision-making structure is wanting,” he said. “They tended to lose focus on some things that pertain to child safety.”

After visiting the city in 2003, Goad wrote 65 pages of guidelines and definitions. His report included 14 scientifically determined factors that contribute to a child being unsafe.

Ransom-Garner said the agency had improved its call-routing system, but had not implemented Goad’s other recommendations.

One year after Porchia died, McGee, then the agency’s operations director, said: “It’s much less likely that a case like Porchia’s will happen again.”

Not again

People knew Bryanna was in danger from the day she was born.

Nurses at Frankford Hospital-Torresdale Campus became concerned when her mother, Viola Redmond, a 22-year-old with an IQ below 90, told them that she didn’t want the child.

“It was alarming. . . . She didn’t pay any attention at all to the baby,” testified the social worker, Columbia Elmelhaoui.

Her testimony, and this account, is drawn from court documents in the Viola Redmond murder case, interviews, and other public records. DHS declined to comment on the case.

A DHS caseworker went to the hospital shortly after the birth in January 2003. Three days later, the worker visited the home in the tidy Crescentville section of Northeast Philadelphia where Viola Redmond was living with her parents.

Along with baby Bryanna, Redmond was caring for a 16-month-old son, Jaleel. She worked a cleaning job at the nearby IRS office.

The caseworker, Robin Goodwin, reported that Redmond seemed “mentally retarded” and “childlike.”

Though at risk, Bryanna would be OK, Goodwin decided, “because of the fact that there are both maternal grandparents in the home.” She did not respond to a request for comment.

DHS referred the case to a private contractor, paid by taxpayers to train Redmond in parenting skills, according to DHS records.

“Most of the time they came, [Viola] was at work,” testified Rosetta Redmond, the baby’s grandmother, at her daughter’s sentencing hearing.

On Dec. 8, 2004, DHS closed the case, deeming the children safe at the grandparents’ house.

Two months later, Viola Redmond and her boyfriend, Damor Davis, decided to move into their own apartment.

Rosetta Redmond testified that she had repeatedly warned DHS that the couple intended to move out. A caseworker promised to get back to her, she said, but never did.

Not long afterward, Viola Redmond’s sister, a parole officer, made an anonymous call to DHS to report that “the child may have a broken bone in her face.”

The call arrived at the DHS hotline at 10:12 a.m. July 15.

It was too late.

Across town, Bryanna was buckled over in her bed, slipping into shock after a death blow to her stomach.

Davis testified that he had found the child in that condition when he returned home from work about 6 a.m., and met Viola on her way out the door.

By 11:58 a.m. Bryanna was dead.

Ian Hood, a Philadelphia deputy medical examiner, testified that the toddler had died of an injury more severe than all but one or two he had seen in his career.

In a statement to detectives, Viola Redmond said she had punished Bryanna for having a temper tantrum by punching her in the stomach.

On the day Bryanna died, a DHS caseworker named Lekisha Harvey tried to investigate the sister’s abuse complaint. But somehow the address had gotten garbled.

It took DHS three days to search a public-assistance database, which turned up Viola’s former address on Reach Street in the Northeast.

The judge in the case, Benjamin Lerner, commented from the bench that the case raised questions about the agency.

“Who is in charge, who gives little children to people who are so obviously, absolutely completely incapable of taking care of them?” Lerner wondered.

From the bench

Lerner, who has been dealing with DHS for decades, as a public defender and then a jurist, argues that the agency is not aggressive enough in removing children from potentially abusive homes.

“I don’t think the system has changed at all” since Porchia Bennett’s death, he said in a recent interview. “I believe that we have to be more forceful earlier in children’s lives when we see that they are simply not being taken care of. I believe that we have to be more accepting of the fact that good motives are not sufficient in parenting, and that many people lack either the will or the ability to raise children in a safe and healthy environment.”

DHS is credited with improving significantly since its worst days in the 1980s, when a series of scandals led to a 1990 class-action lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups.

In 2000, outsider Martinez took the helm and quickly won high marks for a variety of changes. The next year, DHS settled the class action, known as the Baby Neal case. The settlement allowed advocates to audit how the agency handled a sampling of cases for two years. The arrangement expired in 2003.

But experts say the Philadelphia agency remains seriously flawed, with a staff of uneven quality overburdened by caseloads that can exceed 30, nearly double the 17 that national standards recommend.

“In general, they’ve done a lot of great things at the department, and it’s a totally different place than when we sued them,” said Frank Cervone, who runs an agency that provides free legal advocacy for children. Cervone was part of the 1990 lawsuit and is among the city’s foremost DHS experts.

“That said,” he added, “they remain a public agency that has a lot of problems.”

Hearing demons

Almost everyone who knew Lea Currie had serious doubts about whether the 25-year-old could care for her newborn son, Marrieon.

“She was hearing demons,” said neighbor Felix Cruz, 33, who lived just two doors away from Currie on Charles Street in the East Frankford section of the city.

“She was off-balance,” he added, echoing nearly a dozen others interviewed on the block. “She shouldn’t have been raising that kid on her own.”

Currie had tried to kill herself at 17, and she suffered from cerebral palsy, a muscular disorder that left her barely able to walk up the stairs.

Yet after Marrieon was born last fall, DHS decided to leave the baby in her home and send a contract worker to provide support services, neighbors said.

Three months later, Marrieon was dead.

On Jan. 23, Currie held the infant under hot water, threw him down a flight of stairs, and beat him with a mop handle, according to court records.

She quickly confessed and was charged with murder, records show.

Currie told neighbor Amelia Lewis, 35, that demons had confined her and the baby to an upstairs bedroom, Lewis said.

Neighbors said Currie was incapable of even caring for her dog, which they eventually took away.

“She was always calling people to buy food for the dog when she remembered,” said Paul Wons, 45, who worked with Currie’s mother and now lives in the Currie house.

Awaiting trial, Currie has been committed to Norristown State Hospital. Psychiatrists initially ruled her unfit for court, noting that she had “stopped eating and drinking” and had been “soiling herself and lying in her own menstrual fluid.” Court records refer to her as “severely mentally disabled.”

Timika Bowens, 29, who lives across the street, has known Currie most of her life. She can’t understand how DHS left Marrieon in her care.

“DHS killed that baby,” she said.

Bowens and four other residents recalled that in a meeting several weeks before the baby died, a DHS worker asked neighbors to care for the child.

“Who would leave it on the neighborhood to care for a child?” asked Timika Bowens’ mother, Irene.

DHS officials said that it wasn’t their policy to ask neighbors to care for a child, and that if that had happened, it would have been inappropriate.

Neighbor Blanche Jacobs, 41, recalled a day when Currie made a startling confession to her. ” ‘I don’t know how to love my baby,’ ” Jacobs said Currie told her. ” ‘Ms. Blanche, please tell me how.’ “

In one of her few references to a specific case, Ransom-Garner insisted that neighbors had not relayed their concerns to DHS.

“People have a lot to say after a child death,” she said.

But in interviews, neighbors said it should have been clear to anyone, after a few moments of conversation with Currie, that the young mother was in trouble.

“Anyone who would see her, who talks to her, interacts with her, would know right away she couldn’t care for that child,” Timika Bowens said.

“They should have done their job.”

Danieal Kelly, Mom Let Daughter With Cerebral Palsy Rot And Starve To Death Because She Was Ashamed Of Her.

http://unforgottenangels.wordpress.com/2011/02/23/danieal-kelly-mom-let-daughter-with-cerebral-palsy-rot-and-starve-to-death-because-she-was-ashamed-of-her/

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers